Cargando…
Mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a worldwide pandemic and significant public health issue. The effectiveness of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in treating COVID-19 patients has been called into question. AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis on the mortality of COVID-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434060 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2457 |
_version_ | 1784679083959910400 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Ye Wang, Lei Fang, Zhi-Xian Chen, Jing Zheng, Jia-Lian Yao, Ming Chen, Wen-Yu |
author_facet | Zhang, Ye Wang, Lei Fang, Zhi-Xian Chen, Jing Zheng, Jia-Lian Yao, Ming Chen, Wen-Yu |
author_sort | Zhang, Ye |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a worldwide pandemic and significant public health issue. The effectiveness of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in treating COVID-19 patients has been called into question. AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis on the mortality of COVID-19 patients who require ECMO. METHODS: This analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes 2020 (PRISMA) and has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (number CRD42020227414). A quality assessment for all the included articles was performed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Studies with tenor more COVID-19 patients undergoing ECMO were included. The random-effects model was used to obtain the pooled incidence of mortality in COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO. The source of heterogeneity was investigated using subgroup and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: We identified 18 articles with 1494 COVID-19 patients who were receiving ECMO. The score of the quality assessment ranged from 5 to 8 on the NOS. The majority of patients received veno-venous ECMO (93.7%). Overall mortality was estimated to be 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-0.39; I(2 )= 84.8%] based on random-effect pooled estimates. There were significant differences in mortality between location groups (33.0% vs 55.0% vs 37.0% vs 18.0%, P < 0.001), setting groups (28.0% vs 34.0%, P < 0.001), sample size (37.0% vs 31.0%, P < 0.001), and NOS groups (39.0% vs 19.0%, P < 0.001). However, both subgroup analyses based on location, setting, and sample size, and sensitivity analysis failed to identify the source of heterogeneity. The funnel plot indicated no evident asymmetry, and the Egger's (P = 0.95) and Begg's (P = 0.14) tests also revealed no significant publication bias. CONCLUSION: With more resource assessment and risk-benefit analysis, our data reveal that ECMO might be a feasible and effective treatment for COVID-19 patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8968615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89686152022-04-14 Mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis Zhang, Ye Wang, Lei Fang, Zhi-Xian Chen, Jing Zheng, Jia-Lian Yao, Ming Chen, Wen-Yu World J Clin Cases Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a worldwide pandemic and significant public health issue. The effectiveness of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in treating COVID-19 patients has been called into question. AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis on the mortality of COVID-19 patients who require ECMO. METHODS: This analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes 2020 (PRISMA) and has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (number CRD42020227414). A quality assessment for all the included articles was performed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Studies with tenor more COVID-19 patients undergoing ECMO were included. The random-effects model was used to obtain the pooled incidence of mortality in COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO. The source of heterogeneity was investigated using subgroup and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: We identified 18 articles with 1494 COVID-19 patients who were receiving ECMO. The score of the quality assessment ranged from 5 to 8 on the NOS. The majority of patients received veno-venous ECMO (93.7%). Overall mortality was estimated to be 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-0.39; I(2 )= 84.8%] based on random-effect pooled estimates. There were significant differences in mortality between location groups (33.0% vs 55.0% vs 37.0% vs 18.0%, P < 0.001), setting groups (28.0% vs 34.0%, P < 0.001), sample size (37.0% vs 31.0%, P < 0.001), and NOS groups (39.0% vs 19.0%, P < 0.001). However, both subgroup analyses based on location, setting, and sample size, and sensitivity analysis failed to identify the source of heterogeneity. The funnel plot indicated no evident asymmetry, and the Egger's (P = 0.95) and Begg's (P = 0.14) tests also revealed no significant publication bias. CONCLUSION: With more resource assessment and risk-benefit analysis, our data reveal that ECMO might be a feasible and effective treatment for COVID-19 patients. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-03-16 2022-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8968615/ /pubmed/35434060 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2457 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Zhang, Ye Wang, Lei Fang, Zhi-Xian Chen, Jing Zheng, Jia-Lian Yao, Ming Chen, Wen-Yu Mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis |
title | Mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | mortality in patients with covid-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434060 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2457 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangye mortalityinpatientswithcovid19requiringextracorporealmembraneoxygenationametaanalysis AT wanglei mortalityinpatientswithcovid19requiringextracorporealmembraneoxygenationametaanalysis AT fangzhixian mortalityinpatientswithcovid19requiringextracorporealmembraneoxygenationametaanalysis AT chenjing mortalityinpatientswithcovid19requiringextracorporealmembraneoxygenationametaanalysis AT zhengjialian mortalityinpatientswithcovid19requiringextracorporealmembraneoxygenationametaanalysis AT yaoming mortalityinpatientswithcovid19requiringextracorporealmembraneoxygenationametaanalysis AT chenwenyu mortalityinpatientswithcovid19requiringextracorporealmembraneoxygenationametaanalysis |