Cargando…

Needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder (CT) is a common disorder with a large disease burden. The initial treatment is with conservative measures. However, when this fails the next step treatment remains unclear. Minimal invasive treatment modalities have emerged. Needle aspiration of the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verstraelen, Freek, Verhagen, Stéphanie, Giesberts, Anouk, Bonneux, Inge, Koot, Henk, Boer, Willem den, van der Steen, Marieke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05259-z
_version_ 1784679116548603904
author Verstraelen, Freek
Verhagen, Stéphanie
Giesberts, Anouk
Bonneux, Inge
Koot, Henk
Boer, Willem den
van der Steen, Marieke
author_facet Verstraelen, Freek
Verhagen, Stéphanie
Giesberts, Anouk
Bonneux, Inge
Koot, Henk
Boer, Willem den
van der Steen, Marieke
author_sort Verstraelen, Freek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder (CT) is a common disorder with a large disease burden. The initial treatment is with conservative measures. However, when this fails the next step treatment remains unclear. Minimal invasive treatment modalities have emerged. Needle aspiration of the calcific deposits (NACD) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) have both shown good clinical results. Nonetheless, in the current orthopedic literature there are not any studies available that compare both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of those two treatment modalities. Therefore, our primary objective is to compare the effectiveness of NACD to ESWT. A secondary objective is to compare the cost-effectiveness of both treatment modalities and workability. METHODS: Following a power calculation using the minimal clinical important difference of our primary outcome (Constant-Murley score, CMS) 140 patients will be included in the study. Enrolment is based upon strict inclusion/ exclusion criteria outlined in the Methods section. Participants will be randomized by computer in two groups (e.g. 70 patients will receive NACD and 70 patients will receive ESWT). The NACD treatment will consist of a sonographically guided removal of the calcific deposits and the ESWT treatment will be a focused ESWT. Both treatments will be conducted according to a standardized protocol, as part of care as usual in our hospital. The primary outcome will be the between group differences in functional outcome (measured with the CMS) between baseline and after 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be questionnaires regarding the clinical outcome (SST) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Furthermore, NRS pain and cost related questionnaires (iPCQ and ProDisQ) will be collected during follow-up after two months, six months and at final follow-up after 12 months. DISCUSSION: This study will provide more insight regarding treatment for conservative therapy resistant calcific tendinitis of the shoulder by comparing NACD to focused ESWT, which will aid the physician and patient in determining the appropriate treatment plan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register: NTR7093 registered on 11 March 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8968770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89687702022-03-31 Needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial Verstraelen, Freek Verhagen, Stéphanie Giesberts, Anouk Bonneux, Inge Koot, Henk Boer, Willem den van der Steen, Marieke BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder (CT) is a common disorder with a large disease burden. The initial treatment is with conservative measures. However, when this fails the next step treatment remains unclear. Minimal invasive treatment modalities have emerged. Needle aspiration of the calcific deposits (NACD) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) have both shown good clinical results. Nonetheless, in the current orthopedic literature there are not any studies available that compare both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of those two treatment modalities. Therefore, our primary objective is to compare the effectiveness of NACD to ESWT. A secondary objective is to compare the cost-effectiveness of both treatment modalities and workability. METHODS: Following a power calculation using the minimal clinical important difference of our primary outcome (Constant-Murley score, CMS) 140 patients will be included in the study. Enrolment is based upon strict inclusion/ exclusion criteria outlined in the Methods section. Participants will be randomized by computer in two groups (e.g. 70 patients will receive NACD and 70 patients will receive ESWT). The NACD treatment will consist of a sonographically guided removal of the calcific deposits and the ESWT treatment will be a focused ESWT. Both treatments will be conducted according to a standardized protocol, as part of care as usual in our hospital. The primary outcome will be the between group differences in functional outcome (measured with the CMS) between baseline and after 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be questionnaires regarding the clinical outcome (SST) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Furthermore, NRS pain and cost related questionnaires (iPCQ and ProDisQ) will be collected during follow-up after two months, six months and at final follow-up after 12 months. DISCUSSION: This study will provide more insight regarding treatment for conservative therapy resistant calcific tendinitis of the shoulder by comparing NACD to focused ESWT, which will aid the physician and patient in determining the appropriate treatment plan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register: NTR7093 registered on 11 March 2018. BioMed Central 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8968770/ /pubmed/35361169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05259-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Verstraelen, Freek
Verhagen, Stéphanie
Giesberts, Anouk
Bonneux, Inge
Koot, Henk
Boer, Willem den
van der Steen, Marieke
Needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial
title Needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial
title_full Needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr Needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial
title_short Needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial
title_sort needle aspiration of calcific deposits versus shock wave therapy for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: protocol of a randomized, controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05259-z
work_keys_str_mv AT verstraelenfreek needleaspirationofcalcificdepositsversusshockwavetherapyforconservativetherapyresistantcalcifyingtendinitisoftheshoulderprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT verhagenstephanie needleaspirationofcalcificdepositsversusshockwavetherapyforconservativetherapyresistantcalcifyingtendinitisoftheshoulderprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT giesbertsanouk needleaspirationofcalcificdepositsversusshockwavetherapyforconservativetherapyresistantcalcifyingtendinitisoftheshoulderprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bonneuxinge needleaspirationofcalcificdepositsversusshockwavetherapyforconservativetherapyresistantcalcifyingtendinitisoftheshoulderprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT koothenk needleaspirationofcalcificdepositsversusshockwavetherapyforconservativetherapyresistantcalcifyingtendinitisoftheshoulderprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT boerwillemden needleaspirationofcalcificdepositsversusshockwavetherapyforconservativetherapyresistantcalcifyingtendinitisoftheshoulderprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandersteenmarieke needleaspirationofcalcificdepositsversusshockwavetherapyforconservativetherapyresistantcalcifyingtendinitisoftheshoulderprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial