Cargando…

Understanding social engagements: A comparative analysis of user and text features in Twitter

Information is spread as individuals engage with other users in the underlying social network. Analysis of social engagements can therefore provide insights to understand the motivation behind how and why users engage with others in different activities. In this study, we aim to understand the drivi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toraman, Cagri, Şahinuç, Furkan, Yilmaz, Eyup Halit, Akkaya, Ibrahim Batuhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35378818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00872-1
_version_ 1784679119743614976
author Toraman, Cagri
Şahinuç, Furkan
Yilmaz, Eyup Halit
Akkaya, Ibrahim Batuhan
author_facet Toraman, Cagri
Şahinuç, Furkan
Yilmaz, Eyup Halit
Akkaya, Ibrahim Batuhan
author_sort Toraman, Cagri
collection PubMed
description Information is spread as individuals engage with other users in the underlying social network. Analysis of social engagements can therefore provide insights to understand the motivation behind how and why users engage with others in different activities. In this study, we aim to understand the driving factors behind four engagement types in Twitter, namely like, reply, retweet, and quote. We extensively analyze a diverse set of features that reflect user behaviors, as well as tweet attributes and semantics by natural language processing, including a deep learning language model, BERT. The performance of these features is assessed in a supervised task of engagement prediction by learning social engagements from over 14 million multilingual tweets. In the light of our experimental results, we find that users would engage with tweets based on text semantics and contents regardless of tweet author, yet popular and trusted authors could be important for reply and quote. Users who actively liked and retweeted in the past are likely to maintain this type of behavior in the future, while this trend is not seen in more complex types of engagements, reply, and quote. Moreover, users do not necessarily follow the behavior of other users with whom they have previously engaged. We further discuss the social insights obtained from the experimental results to understand better user behavior and social engagements in online social networks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13278-022-00872-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8968783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89687832022-03-31 Understanding social engagements: A comparative analysis of user and text features in Twitter Toraman, Cagri Şahinuç, Furkan Yilmaz, Eyup Halit Akkaya, Ibrahim Batuhan Soc Netw Anal Min Original Article Information is spread as individuals engage with other users in the underlying social network. Analysis of social engagements can therefore provide insights to understand the motivation behind how and why users engage with others in different activities. In this study, we aim to understand the driving factors behind four engagement types in Twitter, namely like, reply, retweet, and quote. We extensively analyze a diverse set of features that reflect user behaviors, as well as tweet attributes and semantics by natural language processing, including a deep learning language model, BERT. The performance of these features is assessed in a supervised task of engagement prediction by learning social engagements from over 14 million multilingual tweets. In the light of our experimental results, we find that users would engage with tweets based on text semantics and contents regardless of tweet author, yet popular and trusted authors could be important for reply and quote. Users who actively liked and retweeted in the past are likely to maintain this type of behavior in the future, while this trend is not seen in more complex types of engagements, reply, and quote. Moreover, users do not necessarily follow the behavior of other users with whom they have previously engaged. We further discuss the social insights obtained from the experimental results to understand better user behavior and social engagements in online social networks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13278-022-00872-1. Springer Vienna 2022-03-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8968783/ /pubmed/35378818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00872-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Toraman, Cagri
Şahinuç, Furkan
Yilmaz, Eyup Halit
Akkaya, Ibrahim Batuhan
Understanding social engagements: A comparative analysis of user and text features in Twitter
title Understanding social engagements: A comparative analysis of user and text features in Twitter
title_full Understanding social engagements: A comparative analysis of user and text features in Twitter
title_fullStr Understanding social engagements: A comparative analysis of user and text features in Twitter
title_full_unstemmed Understanding social engagements: A comparative analysis of user and text features in Twitter
title_short Understanding social engagements: A comparative analysis of user and text features in Twitter
title_sort understanding social engagements: a comparative analysis of user and text features in twitter
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35378818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00872-1
work_keys_str_mv AT toramancagri understandingsocialengagementsacomparativeanalysisofuserandtextfeaturesintwitter
AT sahinucfurkan understandingsocialengagementsacomparativeanalysisofuserandtextfeaturesintwitter
AT yilmazeyuphalit understandingsocialengagementsacomparativeanalysisofuserandtextfeaturesintwitter
AT akkayaibrahimbatuhan understandingsocialengagementsacomparativeanalysisofuserandtextfeaturesintwitter