Cargando…

Applicability of predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission risk in paediatrics: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To summarise multivariable predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions (UHRs) in paediatrics, describe their performance and completeness in reporting, and determine their potential for application in practice. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCE: CINAHL, Embase and P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niehaus, Ines Marina, Kansy, Nina, Stock, Stephanie, Dötsch, Jörg, Müller, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055956
_version_ 1784679165211967488
author Niehaus, Ines Marina
Kansy, Nina
Stock, Stephanie
Dötsch, Jörg
Müller, Dirk
author_facet Niehaus, Ines Marina
Kansy, Nina
Stock, Stephanie
Dötsch, Jörg
Müller, Dirk
author_sort Niehaus, Ines Marina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To summarise multivariable predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions (UHRs) in paediatrics, describe their performance and completeness in reporting, and determine their potential for application in practice. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCE: CINAHL, Embase and PubMed up to 7 October 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English or German language studies aiming to develop or validate a multivariable predictive model for 30-day paediatric UHRs related to all-cause, surgical conditions or general medical conditions were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study characteristics, risk factors significant for predicting readmissions and information about performance measures (eg, c-statistic) were extracted. Reporting quality was addressed by the ‘Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis’ (TRIPOD) adherence form. The study quality was assessed by applying six domains of potential biases. Due to expected heterogeneity among the studies, the data were qualitatively synthesised. RESULTS: Based on 28 studies, 37 predictive models were identified, which could potentially be used for determining individual 30-day UHR risk in paediatrics. The number of study participants ranged from 190 children to 1.4 million encounters. The two most common significant risk factors were comorbidity and (postoperative) length of stay. 23 models showed a c-statistic above 0.7 and are primarily applicable at discharge. The median TRIPOD adherence of the models was 59% (P(25)–P(75), 55%–69%), ranging from a minimum of 33% to a maximum of 81%. Overall, the quality of many studies was moderate to low in all six domains. CONCLUSION: Predictive models may be useful in identifying paediatric patients at increased risk of readmission. To support the application of predictive models, more attention should be placed on completeness in reporting, particularly for those items that may be relevant for implementation in practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8968996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89689962022-04-20 Applicability of predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission risk in paediatrics: a systematic review Niehaus, Ines Marina Kansy, Nina Stock, Stephanie Dötsch, Jörg Müller, Dirk BMJ Open Paediatrics OBJECTIVES: To summarise multivariable predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions (UHRs) in paediatrics, describe their performance and completeness in reporting, and determine their potential for application in practice. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCE: CINAHL, Embase and PubMed up to 7 October 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English or German language studies aiming to develop or validate a multivariable predictive model for 30-day paediatric UHRs related to all-cause, surgical conditions or general medical conditions were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study characteristics, risk factors significant for predicting readmissions and information about performance measures (eg, c-statistic) were extracted. Reporting quality was addressed by the ‘Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis’ (TRIPOD) adherence form. The study quality was assessed by applying six domains of potential biases. Due to expected heterogeneity among the studies, the data were qualitatively synthesised. RESULTS: Based on 28 studies, 37 predictive models were identified, which could potentially be used for determining individual 30-day UHR risk in paediatrics. The number of study participants ranged from 190 children to 1.4 million encounters. The two most common significant risk factors were comorbidity and (postoperative) length of stay. 23 models showed a c-statistic above 0.7 and are primarily applicable at discharge. The median TRIPOD adherence of the models was 59% (P(25)–P(75), 55%–69%), ranging from a minimum of 33% to a maximum of 81%. Overall, the quality of many studies was moderate to low in all six domains. CONCLUSION: Predictive models may be useful in identifying paediatric patients at increased risk of readmission. To support the application of predictive models, more attention should be placed on completeness in reporting, particularly for those items that may be relevant for implementation in practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8968996/ /pubmed/35354615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055956 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Niehaus, Ines Marina
Kansy, Nina
Stock, Stephanie
Dötsch, Jörg
Müller, Dirk
Applicability of predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission risk in paediatrics: a systematic review
title Applicability of predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission risk in paediatrics: a systematic review
title_full Applicability of predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission risk in paediatrics: a systematic review
title_fullStr Applicability of predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission risk in paediatrics: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Applicability of predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission risk in paediatrics: a systematic review
title_short Applicability of predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission risk in paediatrics: a systematic review
title_sort applicability of predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission risk in paediatrics: a systematic review
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055956
work_keys_str_mv AT niehausinesmarina applicabilityofpredictivemodelsfor30dayunplannedhospitalreadmissionriskinpaediatricsasystematicreview
AT kansynina applicabilityofpredictivemodelsfor30dayunplannedhospitalreadmissionriskinpaediatricsasystematicreview
AT stockstephanie applicabilityofpredictivemodelsfor30dayunplannedhospitalreadmissionriskinpaediatricsasystematicreview
AT dotschjorg applicabilityofpredictivemodelsfor30dayunplannedhospitalreadmissionriskinpaediatricsasystematicreview
AT mullerdirk applicabilityofpredictivemodelsfor30dayunplannedhospitalreadmissionriskinpaediatricsasystematicreview