Cargando…

Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales

BACKGROUND: Health belief is an important factor affecting lung cancer screening in high-risk population, but the research based on Chinese cultural background is still insufficient. Therefore, we adapted the English version of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales (LCSHB) into the Chinese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Yu-an, Carter-Harris, Lisa, Yang, Jia-ni, Lin, Xiu jing, Huang, Fei fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y
_version_ 1784679204449681408
author Lin, Yu-an
Carter-Harris, Lisa
Yang, Jia-ni
Lin, Xiu jing
Huang, Fei fei
author_facet Lin, Yu-an
Carter-Harris, Lisa
Yang, Jia-ni
Lin, Xiu jing
Huang, Fei fei
author_sort Lin, Yu-an
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health belief is an important factor affecting lung cancer screening in high-risk population, but the research based on Chinese cultural background is still insufficient. Therefore, we adapted the English version of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales (LCSHB) into the Chinese version (LCSHB-C) and examined its psychometric characteristics. METHODS: After obtaining authorization from the original author, the LCSHB-C was adapted based upon Brislin's translation model. Using a variety of community-based recruitment methods, a total of 353 participants were recruited in Fuzhou, Fujian province, China to complete the questionnaires. We combined the classical test theory and item response theory to examine the psychometric properties of the LCSHB-C. RESULTS: The Cronbach’s alpha for the four subscales ranged from 0.83 ~ 0.93. The content validity index for the four subscales was ranged from 0.87 ~ 1.0. Confirmatory factor analysis supported each subscale structure model fit well. Rasch analysis results further validated the reliability and validity of the four subscales. The person reliability and separation index of each subscale ranged from 0.77 to 0.87 and 1.83 to 2.63, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LCSHB-C is a reliable and valid instrument used to measure health beliefs related to lung cancer screening among those high-risk for lung cancer in China, which facilitates the development of lung cancer screening programs and promotes the "three early prevention strategies" of lung cancer (i.e.,early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8969234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89692342022-04-01 Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales Lin, Yu-an Carter-Harris, Lisa Yang, Jia-ni Lin, Xiu jing Huang, Fei fei BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Health belief is an important factor affecting lung cancer screening in high-risk population, but the research based on Chinese cultural background is still insufficient. Therefore, we adapted the English version of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales (LCSHB) into the Chinese version (LCSHB-C) and examined its psychometric characteristics. METHODS: After obtaining authorization from the original author, the LCSHB-C was adapted based upon Brislin's translation model. Using a variety of community-based recruitment methods, a total of 353 participants were recruited in Fuzhou, Fujian province, China to complete the questionnaires. We combined the classical test theory and item response theory to examine the psychometric properties of the LCSHB-C. RESULTS: The Cronbach’s alpha for the four subscales ranged from 0.83 ~ 0.93. The content validity index for the four subscales was ranged from 0.87 ~ 1.0. Confirmatory factor analysis supported each subscale structure model fit well. Rasch analysis results further validated the reliability and validity of the four subscales. The person reliability and separation index of each subscale ranged from 0.77 to 0.87 and 1.83 to 2.63, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LCSHB-C is a reliable and valid instrument used to measure health beliefs related to lung cancer screening among those high-risk for lung cancer in China, which facilitates the development of lung cancer screening programs and promotes the "three early prevention strategies" of lung cancer (i.e.,early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y. BioMed Central 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8969234/ /pubmed/35354440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lin, Yu-an
Carter-Harris, Lisa
Yang, Jia-ni
Lin, Xiu jing
Huang, Fei fei
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales
title Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales
title_full Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales
title_fullStr Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales
title_short Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales
title_sort adaptation and validation of the chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y
work_keys_str_mv AT linyuan adaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofthelungcancerscreeninghealthbeliefscales
AT carterharrislisa adaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofthelungcancerscreeninghealthbeliefscales
AT yangjiani adaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofthelungcancerscreeninghealthbeliefscales
AT linxiujing adaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofthelungcancerscreeninghealthbeliefscales
AT huangfeifei adaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofthelungcancerscreeninghealthbeliefscales