Cargando…
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales
BACKGROUND: Health belief is an important factor affecting lung cancer screening in high-risk population, but the research based on Chinese cultural background is still insufficient. Therefore, we adapted the English version of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales (LCSHB) into the Chinese...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y |
_version_ | 1784679204449681408 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Yu-an Carter-Harris, Lisa Yang, Jia-ni Lin, Xiu jing Huang, Fei fei |
author_facet | Lin, Yu-an Carter-Harris, Lisa Yang, Jia-ni Lin, Xiu jing Huang, Fei fei |
author_sort | Lin, Yu-an |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health belief is an important factor affecting lung cancer screening in high-risk population, but the research based on Chinese cultural background is still insufficient. Therefore, we adapted the English version of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales (LCSHB) into the Chinese version (LCSHB-C) and examined its psychometric characteristics. METHODS: After obtaining authorization from the original author, the LCSHB-C was adapted based upon Brislin's translation model. Using a variety of community-based recruitment methods, a total of 353 participants were recruited in Fuzhou, Fujian province, China to complete the questionnaires. We combined the classical test theory and item response theory to examine the psychometric properties of the LCSHB-C. RESULTS: The Cronbach’s alpha for the four subscales ranged from 0.83 ~ 0.93. The content validity index for the four subscales was ranged from 0.87 ~ 1.0. Confirmatory factor analysis supported each subscale structure model fit well. Rasch analysis results further validated the reliability and validity of the four subscales. The person reliability and separation index of each subscale ranged from 0.77 to 0.87 and 1.83 to 2.63, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LCSHB-C is a reliable and valid instrument used to measure health beliefs related to lung cancer screening among those high-risk for lung cancer in China, which facilitates the development of lung cancer screening programs and promotes the "three early prevention strategies" of lung cancer (i.e.,early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8969234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89692342022-04-01 Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales Lin, Yu-an Carter-Harris, Lisa Yang, Jia-ni Lin, Xiu jing Huang, Fei fei BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Health belief is an important factor affecting lung cancer screening in high-risk population, but the research based on Chinese cultural background is still insufficient. Therefore, we adapted the English version of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales (LCSHB) into the Chinese version (LCSHB-C) and examined its psychometric characteristics. METHODS: After obtaining authorization from the original author, the LCSHB-C was adapted based upon Brislin's translation model. Using a variety of community-based recruitment methods, a total of 353 participants were recruited in Fuzhou, Fujian province, China to complete the questionnaires. We combined the classical test theory and item response theory to examine the psychometric properties of the LCSHB-C. RESULTS: The Cronbach’s alpha for the four subscales ranged from 0.83 ~ 0.93. The content validity index for the four subscales was ranged from 0.87 ~ 1.0. Confirmatory factor analysis supported each subscale structure model fit well. Rasch analysis results further validated the reliability and validity of the four subscales. The person reliability and separation index of each subscale ranged from 0.77 to 0.87 and 1.83 to 2.63, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LCSHB-C is a reliable and valid instrument used to measure health beliefs related to lung cancer screening among those high-risk for lung cancer in China, which facilitates the development of lung cancer screening programs and promotes the "three early prevention strategies" of lung cancer (i.e.,early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y. BioMed Central 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8969234/ /pubmed/35354440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lin, Yu-an Carter-Harris, Lisa Yang, Jia-ni Lin, Xiu jing Huang, Fei fei Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales |
title | Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales |
title_full | Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales |
title_fullStr | Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales |
title_full_unstemmed | Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales |
title_short | Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales |
title_sort | adaptation and validation of the chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linyuan adaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofthelungcancerscreeninghealthbeliefscales AT carterharrislisa adaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofthelungcancerscreeninghealthbeliefscales AT yangjiani adaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofthelungcancerscreeninghealthbeliefscales AT linxiujing adaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofthelungcancerscreeninghealthbeliefscales AT huangfeifei adaptationandvalidationofthechineseversionofthelungcancerscreeninghealthbeliefscales |