Cargando…
Reliability of the PEDro scale: comparison between trials published in predatory and non-predatory journals
BACKGROUND: Lack of effective peer-review process of predatory journals, resulting in more ambiguity in reporting, language and incomplete descriptions of processes might have an impact on the reliability of PEDro scale. The aim of this investigation was to compare the reliability of the PEDro scale...
Autores principales: | Paci, Matteo, Bianchini, Claudio, Baccini, Marco |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-022-00133-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals
por: Ferris, Lorraine E., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals
por: Beall, Jeffrey
Publicado: (2016) -
Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals
por: Ferris, Lorraine E., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Predatory journal publishing: Is this an alternate universe?
por: Harvey, Edward, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
“FakeBooks” - predatory journals: The dark side of publishing
por: Natarajan, Sundaram, et al.
Publicado: (2016)