Cargando…
Cumulative live birth rates after IVF/ICSI cycles with sperm prepared by density gradient centrifugation vs. swim-up: a retrospective study using a propensity score-matching analysis
BACKGROUND: Density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and swim-up (SU) are the two most widely used sperm preparation methods for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, existing comparisons of IVF/ICSI outcomes following these sperm preparation methods are ins...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00933-2 |
_version_ | 1784679231696928768 |
---|---|
author | Rao, Meng Tang, Li Wang, Longda Chen, Mengxiang Yan, Gaofeng Zhao, Shuhua |
author_facet | Rao, Meng Tang, Li Wang, Longda Chen, Mengxiang Yan, Gaofeng Zhao, Shuhua |
author_sort | Rao, Meng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and swim-up (SU) are the two most widely used sperm preparation methods for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, existing comparisons of IVF/ICSI outcomes following these sperm preparation methods are insufficient and controversial. METHODS: This retrospective study included all first autologous IVF and ICSI cycles performed between March 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 in a single university-based center. A total of 3608 cycles were matched between DGC and SU using propensity score (PS) matching for potential confounding factors at a ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) per aspiration. RESULTS: PS matching provided 719 cycles after DGC and 719 cycles after SU. After adjusting for confounders, the recovery rate, progressive motility rate after sperm preparation, fertilization rate, good-quality embryo rate, and blastocyst formation rate were similar between the DGC and SU groups. The cLBR (odds ratio [OR] = 1.143, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.893–1.461) and LBR per transfer (OR = 1.082, 95% CI: 0.896–1.307) were also not significantly different between the groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in all of the laboratory and clinical outcomes following conventional IVF or ICSI cycles between the two groups. However, a significantly higher fertilization rate (β = 0.074, 95% CI: 0.008–0.140) was observed when using poor-quality sperm in the DGC group than in the SU group. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm preparation using DGC and SU separately resulted in similar IVF/ICSI outcomes. Further studies are warranted to compare the effects of these methods on IVF/ICSI outcomes when using sperm from subgroups of different quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-00933-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8969370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89693702022-04-01 Cumulative live birth rates after IVF/ICSI cycles with sperm prepared by density gradient centrifugation vs. swim-up: a retrospective study using a propensity score-matching analysis Rao, Meng Tang, Li Wang, Longda Chen, Mengxiang Yan, Gaofeng Zhao, Shuhua Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and swim-up (SU) are the two most widely used sperm preparation methods for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, existing comparisons of IVF/ICSI outcomes following these sperm preparation methods are insufficient and controversial. METHODS: This retrospective study included all first autologous IVF and ICSI cycles performed between March 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 in a single university-based center. A total of 3608 cycles were matched between DGC and SU using propensity score (PS) matching for potential confounding factors at a ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) per aspiration. RESULTS: PS matching provided 719 cycles after DGC and 719 cycles after SU. After adjusting for confounders, the recovery rate, progressive motility rate after sperm preparation, fertilization rate, good-quality embryo rate, and blastocyst formation rate were similar between the DGC and SU groups. The cLBR (odds ratio [OR] = 1.143, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.893–1.461) and LBR per transfer (OR = 1.082, 95% CI: 0.896–1.307) were also not significantly different between the groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in all of the laboratory and clinical outcomes following conventional IVF or ICSI cycles between the two groups. However, a significantly higher fertilization rate (β = 0.074, 95% CI: 0.008–0.140) was observed when using poor-quality sperm in the DGC group than in the SU group. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm preparation using DGC and SU separately resulted in similar IVF/ICSI outcomes. Further studies are warranted to compare the effects of these methods on IVF/ICSI outcomes when using sperm from subgroups of different quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-00933-2. BioMed Central 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8969370/ /pubmed/35361225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00933-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Rao, Meng Tang, Li Wang, Longda Chen, Mengxiang Yan, Gaofeng Zhao, Shuhua Cumulative live birth rates after IVF/ICSI cycles with sperm prepared by density gradient centrifugation vs. swim-up: a retrospective study using a propensity score-matching analysis |
title | Cumulative live birth rates after IVF/ICSI cycles with sperm prepared by density gradient centrifugation vs. swim-up: a retrospective study using a propensity score-matching analysis |
title_full | Cumulative live birth rates after IVF/ICSI cycles with sperm prepared by density gradient centrifugation vs. swim-up: a retrospective study using a propensity score-matching analysis |
title_fullStr | Cumulative live birth rates after IVF/ICSI cycles with sperm prepared by density gradient centrifugation vs. swim-up: a retrospective study using a propensity score-matching analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Cumulative live birth rates after IVF/ICSI cycles with sperm prepared by density gradient centrifugation vs. swim-up: a retrospective study using a propensity score-matching analysis |
title_short | Cumulative live birth rates after IVF/ICSI cycles with sperm prepared by density gradient centrifugation vs. swim-up: a retrospective study using a propensity score-matching analysis |
title_sort | cumulative live birth rates after ivf/icsi cycles with sperm prepared by density gradient centrifugation vs. swim-up: a retrospective study using a propensity score-matching analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00933-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raomeng cumulativelivebirthratesafterivficsicycleswithspermpreparedbydensitygradientcentrifugationvsswimuparetrospectivestudyusingapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT tangli cumulativelivebirthratesafterivficsicycleswithspermpreparedbydensitygradientcentrifugationvsswimuparetrospectivestudyusingapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT wanglongda cumulativelivebirthratesafterivficsicycleswithspermpreparedbydensitygradientcentrifugationvsswimuparetrospectivestudyusingapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT chenmengxiang cumulativelivebirthratesafterivficsicycleswithspermpreparedbydensitygradientcentrifugationvsswimuparetrospectivestudyusingapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT yangaofeng cumulativelivebirthratesafterivficsicycleswithspermpreparedbydensitygradientcentrifugationvsswimuparetrospectivestudyusingapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT zhaoshuhua cumulativelivebirthratesafterivficsicycleswithspermpreparedbydensitygradientcentrifugationvsswimuparetrospectivestudyusingapropensityscorematchinganalysis |