Cargando…

Bevacizumab versus PARP-inhibitors in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: In women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) exhibit improved progression-free survival (PFS) when administered concurrent with chemotherapy and/or maintenance therapy, but no study has directly compared their effects. Ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suh, Young Ju, Lee, Banghyun, Kim, Kidong, Jeong, Yujin, Choi, Hwa Yeon, Hwang, Sung Ook, Kim, Yong Beom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09455-x
_version_ 1784679233736409088
author Suh, Young Ju
Lee, Banghyun
Kim, Kidong
Jeong, Yujin
Choi, Hwa Yeon
Hwang, Sung Ook
Kim, Yong Beom
author_facet Suh, Young Ju
Lee, Banghyun
Kim, Kidong
Jeong, Yujin
Choi, Hwa Yeon
Hwang, Sung Ook
Kim, Yong Beom
author_sort Suh, Young Ju
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) exhibit improved progression-free survival (PFS) when administered concurrent with chemotherapy and/or maintenance therapy, but no study has directly compared their effects. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and PARPi in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer using a network meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were searched, and five randomized trials assessing PFS in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer treated with either bevacizumab, PARPi, or placebo or no additional agent (controls) were identified. PFS was compared in the overall population with ovarian cancer, women with a BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAm) and women with homologous-recombination deficiency (HRD). Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) were compared in all populations of the included studies. RESULTS: PARPi improved PFS significantly more than bevacizumab in women with a BRCAm (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36–0.60) and with HRD (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.50–0.87). However, in the overall population with ovarian cancer, no significant difference in PFS was observed between women treated with PARPi and those treated with bevacizumab. PARPi exhibited the highest surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities value as the most effective treatment for PFS (PARPi vs. bevacizumab: 98% vs. 52% in the overall population with ovarian cancer; 100% vs. 50% in women with BRCAm; 100% vs. 50% in women with HRD). For adverse events, the risk of all treatments was similar. However, PARPi had a higher adverse risk than the control group (relative risk 2.14; 95% CI 1.40–3.26). CONCLUSIONS: In women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, PARPi might be more effective in terms of PFS compared to bevacizumab. The risk of serious adverse events was similar for PARPi and bevacizumab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09455-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8969379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89693792022-04-01 Bevacizumab versus PARP-inhibitors in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: a network meta-analysis Suh, Young Ju Lee, Banghyun Kim, Kidong Jeong, Yujin Choi, Hwa Yeon Hwang, Sung Ook Kim, Yong Beom BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: In women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) exhibit improved progression-free survival (PFS) when administered concurrent with chemotherapy and/or maintenance therapy, but no study has directly compared their effects. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and PARPi in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer using a network meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were searched, and five randomized trials assessing PFS in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer treated with either bevacizumab, PARPi, or placebo or no additional agent (controls) were identified. PFS was compared in the overall population with ovarian cancer, women with a BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAm) and women with homologous-recombination deficiency (HRD). Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) were compared in all populations of the included studies. RESULTS: PARPi improved PFS significantly more than bevacizumab in women with a BRCAm (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36–0.60) and with HRD (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.50–0.87). However, in the overall population with ovarian cancer, no significant difference in PFS was observed between women treated with PARPi and those treated with bevacizumab. PARPi exhibited the highest surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities value as the most effective treatment for PFS (PARPi vs. bevacizumab: 98% vs. 52% in the overall population with ovarian cancer; 100% vs. 50% in women with BRCAm; 100% vs. 50% in women with HRD). For adverse events, the risk of all treatments was similar. However, PARPi had a higher adverse risk than the control group (relative risk 2.14; 95% CI 1.40–3.26). CONCLUSIONS: In women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, PARPi might be more effective in terms of PFS compared to bevacizumab. The risk of serious adverse events was similar for PARPi and bevacizumab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09455-x. BioMed Central 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8969379/ /pubmed/35354431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09455-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Suh, Young Ju
Lee, Banghyun
Kim, Kidong
Jeong, Yujin
Choi, Hwa Yeon
Hwang, Sung Ook
Kim, Yong Beom
Bevacizumab versus PARP-inhibitors in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: a network meta-analysis
title Bevacizumab versus PARP-inhibitors in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: a network meta-analysis
title_full Bevacizumab versus PARP-inhibitors in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Bevacizumab versus PARP-inhibitors in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bevacizumab versus PARP-inhibitors in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: a network meta-analysis
title_short Bevacizumab versus PARP-inhibitors in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: a network meta-analysis
title_sort bevacizumab versus parp-inhibitors in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: a network meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09455-x
work_keys_str_mv AT suhyoungju bevacizumabversusparpinhibitorsinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedovariancanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT leebanghyun bevacizumabversusparpinhibitorsinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedovariancanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT kimkidong bevacizumabversusparpinhibitorsinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedovariancanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT jeongyujin bevacizumabversusparpinhibitorsinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedovariancanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT choihwayeon bevacizumabversusparpinhibitorsinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedovariancanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT hwangsungook bevacizumabversusparpinhibitorsinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedovariancanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT kimyongbeom bevacizumabversusparpinhibitorsinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedovariancanceranetworkmetaanalysis