Cargando…

A policy mapping analysis of the U.S. Congressional approach to medical aid-in-dying

Oregon was the first state to legalize medical aid-in-dying (MAID), in 1994. Since then eight states and Washington, DC have legalized MAID through legislation. Despite literature exploring the legal and ethical aspects of MAID, very little research examines MAID policy at the federal level. This st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusmaul, Nancy, Cheon, Ji Hyang, Gibson, Allison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969687/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.3263
_version_ 1784679308687572992
author Kusmaul, Nancy
Cheon, Ji Hyang
Gibson, Allison
author_facet Kusmaul, Nancy
Cheon, Ji Hyang
Gibson, Allison
author_sort Kusmaul, Nancy
collection PubMed
description Oregon was the first state to legalize medical aid-in-dying (MAID), in 1994. Since then eight states and Washington, DC have legalized MAID through legislation. Despite literature exploring the legal and ethical aspects of MAID, very little research examines MAID policy at the federal level. This study aimed to 1) examine the objectives of MAID legislation introduced to the US Congress, and 2) investigate whether these bills increase or decrease access to MAID. This study used the congress.gov website to search for bills related to MAID introduced by the US Congress between 1994 and 2020. From the 98 bills identified, we excluded bills that were not directly related to MAID or were introduced in subsequent congresses. In total, 23 bills were retained and analyzed. The greatest number of bills aimed to restrict funds for MAID, followed by bills that sought to regulate the drugs used for MAID. Other bills prohibited the development of policies supporting MAID, regulated penalties for practitioners related to the drugs used for MAID, and restricted legal assistance for accessing MAID. These bills intended to block or limit patient access to MAID by restricting drugs, funds, health care services, legal assistance, policy, and research. These findings suggest that the federal approach is incongruous with the growing numbers of states that have legalized MAID. Federal policymakers must develop policies to 1) prevent discrimination against vulnerable groups, 2) support funds to study MAID, and 3) build a system to allows eligible individuals to access MAID equally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8969687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89696872022-04-01 A policy mapping analysis of the U.S. Congressional approach to medical aid-in-dying Kusmaul, Nancy Cheon, Ji Hyang Gibson, Allison Innov Aging Abstracts Oregon was the first state to legalize medical aid-in-dying (MAID), in 1994. Since then eight states and Washington, DC have legalized MAID through legislation. Despite literature exploring the legal and ethical aspects of MAID, very little research examines MAID policy at the federal level. This study aimed to 1) examine the objectives of MAID legislation introduced to the US Congress, and 2) investigate whether these bills increase or decrease access to MAID. This study used the congress.gov website to search for bills related to MAID introduced by the US Congress between 1994 and 2020. From the 98 bills identified, we excluded bills that were not directly related to MAID or were introduced in subsequent congresses. In total, 23 bills were retained and analyzed. The greatest number of bills aimed to restrict funds for MAID, followed by bills that sought to regulate the drugs used for MAID. Other bills prohibited the development of policies supporting MAID, regulated penalties for practitioners related to the drugs used for MAID, and restricted legal assistance for accessing MAID. These bills intended to block or limit patient access to MAID by restricting drugs, funds, health care services, legal assistance, policy, and research. These findings suggest that the federal approach is incongruous with the growing numbers of states that have legalized MAID. Federal policymakers must develop policies to 1) prevent discrimination against vulnerable groups, 2) support funds to study MAID, and 3) build a system to allows eligible individuals to access MAID equally. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8969687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.3263 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kusmaul, Nancy
Cheon, Ji Hyang
Gibson, Allison
A policy mapping analysis of the U.S. Congressional approach to medical aid-in-dying
title A policy mapping analysis of the U.S. Congressional approach to medical aid-in-dying
title_full A policy mapping analysis of the U.S. Congressional approach to medical aid-in-dying
title_fullStr A policy mapping analysis of the U.S. Congressional approach to medical aid-in-dying
title_full_unstemmed A policy mapping analysis of the U.S. Congressional approach to medical aid-in-dying
title_short A policy mapping analysis of the U.S. Congressional approach to medical aid-in-dying
title_sort policy mapping analysis of the u.s. congressional approach to medical aid-in-dying
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969687/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.3263
work_keys_str_mv AT kusmaulnancy apolicymappinganalysisoftheuscongressionalapproachtomedicalaidindying
AT cheonjihyang apolicymappinganalysisoftheuscongressionalapproachtomedicalaidindying
AT gibsonallison apolicymappinganalysisoftheuscongressionalapproachtomedicalaidindying
AT kusmaulnancy policymappinganalysisoftheuscongressionalapproachtomedicalaidindying
AT cheonjihyang policymappinganalysisoftheuscongressionalapproachtomedicalaidindying
AT gibsonallison policymappinganalysisoftheuscongressionalapproachtomedicalaidindying