Cargando…

Age-Friendly Communities and Aging in Place: Findings From Latent Profile Analysis

Older adults prefer to live in their current home or community and ‘Aging in place’ has been shown to reduce the cost of caring for older adults and help their successful aging. Although age-friendly communities (AFC) initiatives have been helpful to aging in place, little has been known about the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seon, Kim, Kyeongmo, kim, junpyo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8970168/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2141
_version_ 1784679407796879360
author Kim, Seon
Kim, Kyeongmo
kim, junpyo
author_facet Kim, Seon
Kim, Kyeongmo
kim, junpyo
author_sort Kim, Seon
collection PubMed
description Older adults prefer to live in their current home or community and ‘Aging in place’ has been shown to reduce the cost of caring for older adults and help their successful aging. Although age-friendly communities (AFC) initiatives have been helpful to aging in place, little has been known about the relationship between the types of AFC and aging in place. Using the 2017 AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey, we included 1,079 adults aged 65 or older. We measured aging in place as ‘move to a different community’, ‘move into a different residence within your current community’, and ‘stay in your current residence’, and included eight AFC constructs. We identified the type of AFC using Latent Profile Analysis: low-friendly, mid-friendly, and high-friendly. We also ran multinomial logistic regression to examine whether the types of AFC were associated with aging in place. Of the total participants, 26.0% lived in the low-friendly community, 23.7% in the mid-friendly community, and 50.3% in the high-friendly community. Older adults living in the high-friendly community were more likely to stay in the current residence (64.7%) than those in the low-friendly (47.1%) (χ2=28.680, p<.001). Also, older adults living in the low-friendly community (OR=3.05, p<.001) and the mid-friendly community (OR=1.42, p<.10) were more likely to move to a different community compared to those living in the high-friendly community. This result suggests that it is important to build an AFC to promote aging in place. For the growing number of older adults' lives, policymakers should consider expanding the AFC initiatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8970168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89701682022-04-01 Age-Friendly Communities and Aging in Place: Findings From Latent Profile Analysis Kim, Seon Kim, Kyeongmo kim, junpyo Innov Aging Abstracts Older adults prefer to live in their current home or community and ‘Aging in place’ has been shown to reduce the cost of caring for older adults and help their successful aging. Although age-friendly communities (AFC) initiatives have been helpful to aging in place, little has been known about the relationship between the types of AFC and aging in place. Using the 2017 AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey, we included 1,079 adults aged 65 or older. We measured aging in place as ‘move to a different community’, ‘move into a different residence within your current community’, and ‘stay in your current residence’, and included eight AFC constructs. We identified the type of AFC using Latent Profile Analysis: low-friendly, mid-friendly, and high-friendly. We also ran multinomial logistic regression to examine whether the types of AFC were associated with aging in place. Of the total participants, 26.0% lived in the low-friendly community, 23.7% in the mid-friendly community, and 50.3% in the high-friendly community. Older adults living in the high-friendly community were more likely to stay in the current residence (64.7%) than those in the low-friendly (47.1%) (χ2=28.680, p<.001). Also, older adults living in the low-friendly community (OR=3.05, p<.001) and the mid-friendly community (OR=1.42, p<.10) were more likely to move to a different community compared to those living in the high-friendly community. This result suggests that it is important to build an AFC to promote aging in place. For the growing number of older adults' lives, policymakers should consider expanding the AFC initiatives. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8970168/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2141 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kim, Seon
Kim, Kyeongmo
kim, junpyo
Age-Friendly Communities and Aging in Place: Findings From Latent Profile Analysis
title Age-Friendly Communities and Aging in Place: Findings From Latent Profile Analysis
title_full Age-Friendly Communities and Aging in Place: Findings From Latent Profile Analysis
title_fullStr Age-Friendly Communities and Aging in Place: Findings From Latent Profile Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Age-Friendly Communities and Aging in Place: Findings From Latent Profile Analysis
title_short Age-Friendly Communities and Aging in Place: Findings From Latent Profile Analysis
title_sort age-friendly communities and aging in place: findings from latent profile analysis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8970168/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2141
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseon agefriendlycommunitiesandaginginplacefindingsfromlatentprofileanalysis
AT kimkyeongmo agefriendlycommunitiesandaginginplacefindingsfromlatentprofileanalysis
AT kimjunpyo agefriendlycommunitiesandaginginplacefindingsfromlatentprofileanalysis