Cargando…
Review of COVID-19 testing and diagnostic methods
More than six billion tests for COVID-19 has been already performed in the world. The testing for SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2) virus and corresponding human antibodies is essential not only for diagnostics and treatment of the infection by medical institutions, but al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8970625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35390680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123409 |
_version_ | 1784679497591685120 |
---|---|
author | Filchakova, Olena Dossym, Dina Ilyas, Aisha Kuanysheva, Tamila Abdizhamil, Altynay Bukasov, Rostislav |
author_facet | Filchakova, Olena Dossym, Dina Ilyas, Aisha Kuanysheva, Tamila Abdizhamil, Altynay Bukasov, Rostislav |
author_sort | Filchakova, Olena |
collection | PubMed |
description | More than six billion tests for COVID-19 has been already performed in the world. The testing for SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2) virus and corresponding human antibodies is essential not only for diagnostics and treatment of the infection by medical institutions, but also as a pre-requisite for major semi-normal economic and social activities such as international flights, off line work and study in offices, access to malls, sport and social events. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, time to results and cost per test are essential parameters of those tests and even minimal improvement in any of them may have noticeable impact on life in the many countries of the world. We described, analyzed and compared methods of COVID-19 detection, while representing their parameters in 22 tables. Also, we compared test performance of some FDA approved test kits with clinical performance of some non-FDA approved methods just described in scientific literature. RT-PCR still remains a golden standard in detection of the virus, but a pressing need for alternative less expensive, more rapid, point of care methods is evident. Those methods that may eventually get developed to satisfy this need are explained, discussed, quantitatively compared. The review has a bioanalytical chemistry prospective, but it may be interesting for a broader circle of readers who are interested in understanding and improvement of COVID-19 testing, helping eventually to leave COVID-19 pandemic in the past. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8970625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89706252022-04-01 Review of COVID-19 testing and diagnostic methods Filchakova, Olena Dossym, Dina Ilyas, Aisha Kuanysheva, Tamila Abdizhamil, Altynay Bukasov, Rostislav Talanta Article More than six billion tests for COVID-19 has been already performed in the world. The testing for SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2) virus and corresponding human antibodies is essential not only for diagnostics and treatment of the infection by medical institutions, but also as a pre-requisite for major semi-normal economic and social activities such as international flights, off line work and study in offices, access to malls, sport and social events. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, time to results and cost per test are essential parameters of those tests and even minimal improvement in any of them may have noticeable impact on life in the many countries of the world. We described, analyzed and compared methods of COVID-19 detection, while representing their parameters in 22 tables. Also, we compared test performance of some FDA approved test kits with clinical performance of some non-FDA approved methods just described in scientific literature. RT-PCR still remains a golden standard in detection of the virus, but a pressing need for alternative less expensive, more rapid, point of care methods is evident. Those methods that may eventually get developed to satisfy this need are explained, discussed, quantitatively compared. The review has a bioanalytical chemistry prospective, but it may be interesting for a broader circle of readers who are interested in understanding and improvement of COVID-19 testing, helping eventually to leave COVID-19 pandemic in the past. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-07-01 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8970625/ /pubmed/35390680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123409 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Filchakova, Olena Dossym, Dina Ilyas, Aisha Kuanysheva, Tamila Abdizhamil, Altynay Bukasov, Rostislav Review of COVID-19 testing and diagnostic methods |
title | Review of COVID-19 testing and diagnostic methods |
title_full | Review of COVID-19 testing and diagnostic methods |
title_fullStr | Review of COVID-19 testing and diagnostic methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of COVID-19 testing and diagnostic methods |
title_short | Review of COVID-19 testing and diagnostic methods |
title_sort | review of covid-19 testing and diagnostic methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8970625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35390680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT filchakovaolena reviewofcovid19testinganddiagnosticmethods AT dossymdina reviewofcovid19testinganddiagnosticmethods AT ilyasaisha reviewofcovid19testinganddiagnosticmethods AT kuanyshevatamila reviewofcovid19testinganddiagnosticmethods AT abdizhamilaltynay reviewofcovid19testinganddiagnosticmethods AT bukasovrostislav reviewofcovid19testinganddiagnosticmethods |