Cargando…

Amphilimus- vs. zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the SUGAR trial

AIM: Patients with diabetes mellitus are at high risk of adverse events after percutaneous revascularization, with no differences in outcomes between most contemporary drug-eluting stents. The Cre8 EVO stent releases a formulation of sirolimus with an amphiphilic carrier from laser-dug wells, and ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romaguera, Rafael, Salinas, Pablo, Gomez-Lara, Josep, Brugaletta, Salvatore, Gómez-Menchero, Antonio, Romero, Miguel A, García-Blas, Sergio, Ocaranza, Raymundo, Bordes, Pascual, Kockar, Marcelo Jiménez, Salvatella, Neus, Jiménez-Díaz, Victor A, Alameda, Mar, Trillo, Ramiro, Lee, Dae Hyun, Martín, Pedro, López-Benito, María, Freites, Alfonso, Pascual-Tejerina, Virginia, Hernández-Hernández, Felipe, del Blanco, Bruno García, Mohandes, Mohsen, Bosa, Francisco, Pinar, Eduardo, Roura, Gerard, Comin-Colet, Josep, Fernández-Ortiz, Antonio, Macaya, Carlos, Rossello, Xavier, Sabate, Manel, Pocock, Stuart J, Gómez-Hospital, Joan A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8970998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34735004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab790
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: Patients with diabetes mellitus are at high risk of adverse events after percutaneous revascularization, with no differences in outcomes between most contemporary drug-eluting stents. The Cre8 EVO stent releases a formulation of sirolimus with an amphiphilic carrier from laser-dug wells, and has shown clinical benefits in diabetes. We aimed to compare Cre8 EVO stents to Resolute Onyx stents (a contemporary polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent) in patients with diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We did an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial at 23 sites in Spain. Eligible patients had diabetes and required percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 1175 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Cre8 EVO or Resolute Onyx stents. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. The trial had a non-inferiority design with a 4% margin for the primary endpoint. A superiority analysis was planned if non-inferiority was confirmed. There were 106 primary events, 42 (7.2%) in the Cre8 EVO group and 64 (10.9%) in the Resolute Onyx group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44–0.96; P  (non-inferiority) < 0.001; P  (superiority) = 0.030]. Among the secondary endpoints, Cre8 EVO stents had significantly lower rate than Resolute Onyx stents of target-vessel failure (7.5% vs. 11.1%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46–0.99; P = 0.042). Probable or definite stent thrombosis and all-cause death were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with diabetes, Cre8 EVO stents were non-inferior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to target-lesion failure composite outcome. An exploratory analysis for superiority at 1 year suggests that the Cre8 EVO stents might be superior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to the same outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03321032.