Cargando…

Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the efficacy and durability of anti-RBD IgG antibodies induced by certain SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. It has been shown that neutralizing antibodies are associated with the protection against re-infection. This study aims to compare the mean titers, duration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sughayer, M.A., Souan, L., Abu Alhowr, M.M., Al Rimawi, D., Siag, M., Albadr, S., Owdeh, M., Al Atrash, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35397946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.069
_version_ 1784679565751222272
author Sughayer, M.A.
Souan, L.
Abu Alhowr, M.M.
Al Rimawi, D.
Siag, M.
Albadr, S.
Owdeh, M.
Al Atrash, T.
author_facet Sughayer, M.A.
Souan, L.
Abu Alhowr, M.M.
Al Rimawi, D.
Siag, M.
Albadr, S.
Owdeh, M.
Al Atrash, T.
author_sort Sughayer, M.A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the efficacy and durability of anti-RBD IgG antibodies induced by certain SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. It has been shown that neutralizing antibodies are associated with the protection against re-infection. This study aims to compare the mean titers, duration, and efficacy of generating protective anti-RBD IgG antibody response among recipients of Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, and Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, we aimed to compare the susceptibility of getting COVID-19 breakthrough infections after various types of vaccines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples from 2065 blood bank donors and healthcare workers at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) were collected between February and September 2021. Anti-Spike/RBD IgG levels were measured using Chemiluminescent microparticle-immunoassay (CMIA) (ARCHITECT IgG II Quant test, Abbott, USA). RESULTS: The mean titer of anti-RBD IgG levels was significantly diverse among different types of vaccines. The highest titer level was seen in participants who took a third booster vaccine shot, followed by Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca, and Sinopharm vaccine. The mean titer levels of anti-RBD IgG antibodies in the Pfizer vaccinated group was the highest after vaccination but started to drop after 60 days from vaccination unlike AstraZeneca and Sinopharm vaccine-induced antibodies where the mean titers continued to be stable until 120 days but their levels were significantly lower. Most of the breakthrough infections were among the Sinopharm vaccinated group and these breakthroughs happened at random times for the three main types of vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that the mean-titer of anti-RBD IgG levels drop after four months which is the best time to take the additional booster shot from a more potent vaccine type such as mRNA vaccines that might be needed in Jordan and worldwide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8971065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89710652022-04-01 Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies Sughayer, M.A. Souan, L. Abu Alhowr, M.M. Al Rimawi, D. Siag, M. Albadr, S. Owdeh, M. Al Atrash, T. Vaccine Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the efficacy and durability of anti-RBD IgG antibodies induced by certain SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. It has been shown that neutralizing antibodies are associated with the protection against re-infection. This study aims to compare the mean titers, duration, and efficacy of generating protective anti-RBD IgG antibody response among recipients of Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, and Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, we aimed to compare the susceptibility of getting COVID-19 breakthrough infections after various types of vaccines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples from 2065 blood bank donors and healthcare workers at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) were collected between February and September 2021. Anti-Spike/RBD IgG levels were measured using Chemiluminescent microparticle-immunoassay (CMIA) (ARCHITECT IgG II Quant test, Abbott, USA). RESULTS: The mean titer of anti-RBD IgG levels was significantly diverse among different types of vaccines. The highest titer level was seen in participants who took a third booster vaccine shot, followed by Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca, and Sinopharm vaccine. The mean titer levels of anti-RBD IgG antibodies in the Pfizer vaccinated group was the highest after vaccination but started to drop after 60 days from vaccination unlike AstraZeneca and Sinopharm vaccine-induced antibodies where the mean titers continued to be stable until 120 days but their levels were significantly lower. Most of the breakthrough infections were among the Sinopharm vaccinated group and these breakthroughs happened at random times for the three main types of vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that the mean-titer of anti-RBD IgG levels drop after four months which is the best time to take the additional booster shot from a more potent vaccine type such as mRNA vaccines that might be needed in Jordan and worldwide. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-05-03 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8971065/ /pubmed/35397946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.069 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Sughayer, M.A.
Souan, L.
Abu Alhowr, M.M.
Al Rimawi, D.
Siag, M.
Albadr, S.
Owdeh, M.
Al Atrash, T.
Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies
title Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies
title_full Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies
title_fullStr Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies
title_short Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies
title_sort comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-rbd sars-cov-2 igg antibody response between different types of vaccines: implications for vaccine strategies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35397946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.069
work_keys_str_mv AT sughayerma comparisonoftheeffectivenessanddurationofantirbdsarscov2iggantibodyresponsebetweendifferenttypesofvaccinesimplicationsforvaccinestrategies
AT souanl comparisonoftheeffectivenessanddurationofantirbdsarscov2iggantibodyresponsebetweendifferenttypesofvaccinesimplicationsforvaccinestrategies
AT abualhowrmm comparisonoftheeffectivenessanddurationofantirbdsarscov2iggantibodyresponsebetweendifferenttypesofvaccinesimplicationsforvaccinestrategies
AT alrimawid comparisonoftheeffectivenessanddurationofantirbdsarscov2iggantibodyresponsebetweendifferenttypesofvaccinesimplicationsforvaccinestrategies
AT siagm comparisonoftheeffectivenessanddurationofantirbdsarscov2iggantibodyresponsebetweendifferenttypesofvaccinesimplicationsforvaccinestrategies
AT albadrs comparisonoftheeffectivenessanddurationofantirbdsarscov2iggantibodyresponsebetweendifferenttypesofvaccinesimplicationsforvaccinestrategies
AT owdehm comparisonoftheeffectivenessanddurationofantirbdsarscov2iggantibodyresponsebetweendifferenttypesofvaccinesimplicationsforvaccinestrategies
AT alatrasht comparisonoftheeffectivenessanddurationofantirbdsarscov2iggantibodyresponsebetweendifferenttypesofvaccinesimplicationsforvaccinestrategies