Cargando…
Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension
The neurobiology of sentence production has been largely understudied compared to the neurobiology of sentence comprehension, due to difficulties with experimental control and motion-related artifacts in neuroimaging. We studied the neural response to constituents of increasing size and specifically...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34491301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab287 |
_version_ | 1784679568648437760 |
---|---|
author | Giglio, Laura Ostarek, Markus Weber, Kirsten Hagoort, Peter |
author_facet | Giglio, Laura Ostarek, Markus Weber, Kirsten Hagoort, Peter |
author_sort | Giglio, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | The neurobiology of sentence production has been largely understudied compared to the neurobiology of sentence comprehension, due to difficulties with experimental control and motion-related artifacts in neuroimaging. We studied the neural response to constituents of increasing size and specifically focused on the similarities and differences in the production and comprehension of the same stimuli. Participants had to either produce or listen to stimuli in a gradient of constituent size based on a visual prompt. Larger constituent sizes engaged the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and middle temporal gyrus (LMTG) extending to inferior parietal areas in both production and comprehension, confirming that the neural resources for syntactic encoding and decoding are largely overlapping. An ROI analysis in LIFG and LMTG also showed that production elicited larger responses to constituent size than comprehension and that the LMTG was more engaged in comprehension than production, while the LIFG was more engaged in production than comprehension. Finally, increasing constituent size was characterized by later BOLD peaks in comprehension but earlier peaks in production. These results show that syntactic encoding and parsing engage overlapping areas, but there are asymmetries in the engagement of the language network due to the specific requirements of production and comprehension. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8971077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89710772022-04-01 Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension Giglio, Laura Ostarek, Markus Weber, Kirsten Hagoort, Peter Cereb Cortex Original Article The neurobiology of sentence production has been largely understudied compared to the neurobiology of sentence comprehension, due to difficulties with experimental control and motion-related artifacts in neuroimaging. We studied the neural response to constituents of increasing size and specifically focused on the similarities and differences in the production and comprehension of the same stimuli. Participants had to either produce or listen to stimuli in a gradient of constituent size based on a visual prompt. Larger constituent sizes engaged the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and middle temporal gyrus (LMTG) extending to inferior parietal areas in both production and comprehension, confirming that the neural resources for syntactic encoding and decoding are largely overlapping. An ROI analysis in LIFG and LMTG also showed that production elicited larger responses to constituent size than comprehension and that the LMTG was more engaged in comprehension than production, while the LIFG was more engaged in production than comprehension. Finally, increasing constituent size was characterized by later BOLD peaks in comprehension but earlier peaks in production. These results show that syntactic encoding and parsing engage overlapping areas, but there are asymmetries in the engagement of the language network due to the specific requirements of production and comprehension. Oxford University Press 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8971077/ /pubmed/34491301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab287 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Giglio, Laura Ostarek, Markus Weber, Kirsten Hagoort, Peter Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension |
title | Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension |
title_full | Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension |
title_fullStr | Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension |
title_full_unstemmed | Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension |
title_short | Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension |
title_sort | commonalities and asymmetries in the neurobiological infrastructure for language production and comprehension |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34491301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gigliolaura commonalitiesandasymmetriesintheneurobiologicalinfrastructureforlanguageproductionandcomprehension AT ostarekmarkus commonalitiesandasymmetriesintheneurobiologicalinfrastructureforlanguageproductionandcomprehension AT weberkirsten commonalitiesandasymmetriesintheneurobiologicalinfrastructureforlanguageproductionandcomprehension AT hagoortpeter commonalitiesandasymmetriesintheneurobiologicalinfrastructureforlanguageproductionandcomprehension |