Cargando…

In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser

The aim of this work was to compare the fragmentation efficiency of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser (p-Tm:YAG) to that of a chopped Thulium fibre laser (TFL) and a pulsed Holmium solid-state laser (Ho:YAG). During the fragmentation process, we used a silicone mould to fixate the hemispheri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraft, Lea, Petzold, Ralf, Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo, Miernik, Arkadiusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03495-8
_version_ 1784679583193235456
author Kraft, Lea
Petzold, Ralf
Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
Miernik, Arkadiusz
author_facet Kraft, Lea
Petzold, Ralf
Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
Miernik, Arkadiusz
author_sort Kraft, Lea
collection PubMed
description The aim of this work was to compare the fragmentation efficiency of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser (p-Tm:YAG) to that of a chopped Thulium fibre laser (TFL) and a pulsed Holmium solid-state laser (Ho:YAG). During the fragmentation process, we used a silicone mould to fixate the hemispherical stone models under water in a jar filled with room-temperature water. Each laser device registered the total energy applied to the stone model to determine fragmentation efficiency. Our study examined laser settings with single pulse energies ranging from 0.6 to 6 J and pulse frequencies ranging from 5 to 15 Hz. Similar laser settings were applied to explicitly compare the fragmentation efficiency of all three devices. We experimented with additional laser settings to see which of the three devices would perform best. The fragmentation performance of the three laser devices differed statistically significantly (p < 0.05). The average total energy required to fragment the stone model was 345.96 J for Ho:YAG, 372.43 J for p-Tm:YAG and 483.90 J for TFL. To fragment the stone models, both Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG needed similar total energy (p = 0.97). TFL’s fragmentation efficiency is significantly lower than that of Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG. Furthermore, we found the novel p-Tm:YAG’s fragmentation efficiency to closely resemble that of Ho:YAG. The fragmentation efficiency is thought to be influenced by the pulse duration. TFL’s shortest possible pulse duration was considerably longer than that of Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG, resulting in Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG exhibiting better fragmenting efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8971152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89711522022-04-07 In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser Kraft, Lea Petzold, Ralf Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo Miernik, Arkadiusz Lasers Med Sci Original Article The aim of this work was to compare the fragmentation efficiency of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser (p-Tm:YAG) to that of a chopped Thulium fibre laser (TFL) and a pulsed Holmium solid-state laser (Ho:YAG). During the fragmentation process, we used a silicone mould to fixate the hemispherical stone models under water in a jar filled with room-temperature water. Each laser device registered the total energy applied to the stone model to determine fragmentation efficiency. Our study examined laser settings with single pulse energies ranging from 0.6 to 6 J and pulse frequencies ranging from 5 to 15 Hz. Similar laser settings were applied to explicitly compare the fragmentation efficiency of all three devices. We experimented with additional laser settings to see which of the three devices would perform best. The fragmentation performance of the three laser devices differed statistically significantly (p < 0.05). The average total energy required to fragment the stone model was 345.96 J for Ho:YAG, 372.43 J for p-Tm:YAG and 483.90 J for TFL. To fragment the stone models, both Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG needed similar total energy (p = 0.97). TFL’s fragmentation efficiency is significantly lower than that of Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG. Furthermore, we found the novel p-Tm:YAG’s fragmentation efficiency to closely resemble that of Ho:YAG. The fragmentation efficiency is thought to be influenced by the pulse duration. TFL’s shortest possible pulse duration was considerably longer than that of Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG, resulting in Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG exhibiting better fragmenting efficiency. Springer London 2021-12-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8971152/ /pubmed/34905141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03495-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kraft, Lea
Petzold, Ralf
Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
Miernik, Arkadiusz
In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser
title In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser
title_full In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser
title_fullStr In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser
title_full_unstemmed In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser
title_short In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser
title_sort in vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed thulium solid-state laser compared to a thulium fibre laser and standard ho:yag laser
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03495-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kraftlea invitrofragmentationperformanceofanovelpulsedthuliumsolidstatelasercomparedtoathuliumfibrelaserandstandardhoyaglaser
AT petzoldralf invitrofragmentationperformanceofanovelpulsedthuliumsolidstatelasercomparedtoathuliumfibrelaserandstandardhoyaglaser
AT suarezibarrolarodrigo invitrofragmentationperformanceofanovelpulsedthuliumsolidstatelasercomparedtoathuliumfibrelaserandstandardhoyaglaser
AT miernikarkadiusz invitrofragmentationperformanceofanovelpulsedthuliumsolidstatelasercomparedtoathuliumfibrelaserandstandardhoyaglaser