Cargando…
The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial
Non-invasive vaginal rejuvenation with radiofrequency (RF) and lasers devices have gained popularity, but well-designed studies confirming their effectiveness are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a multipolar RF and pulsed electromagnetic field-based device (P...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34647191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03438-3 |
_version_ | 1784679589732155392 |
---|---|
author | Wattanakrai, Penpun Limpjaroenviriyakul, Nattawan Thongtan, Darin Wattanayingcharoenchai, Rujira Manonai, Jittima |
author_facet | Wattanakrai, Penpun Limpjaroenviriyakul, Nattawan Thongtan, Darin Wattanayingcharoenchai, Rujira Manonai, Jittima |
author_sort | Wattanakrai, Penpun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-invasive vaginal rejuvenation with radiofrequency (RF) and lasers devices have gained popularity, but well-designed studies confirming their effectiveness are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a multipolar RF and pulsed electromagnetic field-based device (PEMF) versus sham for vaginal laxity. Thirty-two premenopausal females with ≥ 1 vaginal delivery and self-reported vaginal laxity were randomized into 2 groups: active (RF + PEMF) and sham. Both groups received 3 vaginal treatments at 3-week interval. The Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire (VLQ), perineometer measurements, and Brink score were conducted at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks after treatments. Pre and post-treatment vaginal histology, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), subjects’ satisfaction, pain, and adverse events were assessed. The active group VLQ scores increased and were significantly better than the sham group (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, 50% of the active group reported no vaginal laxity (VLQ > 4) versus 12% in the sham group (p = 0.054). In the active group, all domains of perineometer measurements and Brink scores (p < 0.001), FSFI scores (p < 0.05), and patients’ satisfaction (p < 0.001) were significantly increased and higher in the active group. Mild adverse effects including pain and burning sensation were not different between groups except for itch which was significantly higher in the sham arm (p = 0.014). Histology after RF + PEMF treatments demonstrated neocollagenesis, neoelastogenesis, and neoangiogenesis. In conclusion, combination RF + PEMF therapy was safe, improved vaginal laxity, strengthened pelvic floor muscles, and improved female sexual function for at least 12-week post-procedures with confirmed histological improvements. This study was registered on the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20200803002 on 2020–07-30 “retrospectively registered.” |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8971182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89711822022-04-07 The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial Wattanakrai, Penpun Limpjaroenviriyakul, Nattawan Thongtan, Darin Wattanayingcharoenchai, Rujira Manonai, Jittima Lasers Med Sci Original Article Non-invasive vaginal rejuvenation with radiofrequency (RF) and lasers devices have gained popularity, but well-designed studies confirming their effectiveness are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a multipolar RF and pulsed electromagnetic field-based device (PEMF) versus sham for vaginal laxity. Thirty-two premenopausal females with ≥ 1 vaginal delivery and self-reported vaginal laxity were randomized into 2 groups: active (RF + PEMF) and sham. Both groups received 3 vaginal treatments at 3-week interval. The Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire (VLQ), perineometer measurements, and Brink score were conducted at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks after treatments. Pre and post-treatment vaginal histology, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), subjects’ satisfaction, pain, and adverse events were assessed. The active group VLQ scores increased and were significantly better than the sham group (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, 50% of the active group reported no vaginal laxity (VLQ > 4) versus 12% in the sham group (p = 0.054). In the active group, all domains of perineometer measurements and Brink scores (p < 0.001), FSFI scores (p < 0.05), and patients’ satisfaction (p < 0.001) were significantly increased and higher in the active group. Mild adverse effects including pain and burning sensation were not different between groups except for itch which was significantly higher in the sham arm (p = 0.014). Histology after RF + PEMF treatments demonstrated neocollagenesis, neoelastogenesis, and neoangiogenesis. In conclusion, combination RF + PEMF therapy was safe, improved vaginal laxity, strengthened pelvic floor muscles, and improved female sexual function for at least 12-week post-procedures with confirmed histological improvements. This study was registered on the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20200803002 on 2020–07-30 “retrospectively registered.” Springer London 2021-10-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8971182/ /pubmed/34647191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03438-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wattanakrai, Penpun Limpjaroenviriyakul, Nattawan Thongtan, Darin Wattanayingcharoenchai, Rujira Manonai, Jittima The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial |
title | The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial |
title_full | The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial |
title_short | The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34647191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03438-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wattanakraipenpun theefficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT limpjaroenviriyakulnattawan theefficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT thongtandarin theefficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT wattanayingcharoenchairujira theefficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT manonaijittima theefficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT wattanakraipenpun efficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT limpjaroenviriyakulnattawan efficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT thongtandarin efficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT wattanayingcharoenchairujira efficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT manonaijittima efficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial |