Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial

Non-invasive vaginal rejuvenation with radiofrequency (RF) and lasers devices have gained popularity, but well-designed studies confirming their effectiveness are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a multipolar RF and pulsed electromagnetic field-based device (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wattanakrai, Penpun, Limpjaroenviriyakul, Nattawan, Thongtan, Darin, Wattanayingcharoenchai, Rujira, Manonai, Jittima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34647191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03438-3
_version_ 1784679589732155392
author Wattanakrai, Penpun
Limpjaroenviriyakul, Nattawan
Thongtan, Darin
Wattanayingcharoenchai, Rujira
Manonai, Jittima
author_facet Wattanakrai, Penpun
Limpjaroenviriyakul, Nattawan
Thongtan, Darin
Wattanayingcharoenchai, Rujira
Manonai, Jittima
author_sort Wattanakrai, Penpun
collection PubMed
description Non-invasive vaginal rejuvenation with radiofrequency (RF) and lasers devices have gained popularity, but well-designed studies confirming their effectiveness are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a multipolar RF and pulsed electromagnetic field-based device (PEMF) versus sham for vaginal laxity. Thirty-two premenopausal females with ≥ 1 vaginal delivery and self-reported vaginal laxity were randomized into 2 groups: active (RF + PEMF) and sham. Both groups received 3 vaginal treatments at 3-week interval. The Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire (VLQ), perineometer measurements, and Brink score were conducted at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks after treatments. Pre and post-treatment vaginal histology, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), subjects’ satisfaction, pain, and adverse events were assessed. The active group VLQ scores increased and were significantly better than the sham group (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, 50% of the active group reported no vaginal laxity (VLQ > 4) versus 12% in the sham group (p = 0.054). In the active group, all domains of perineometer measurements and Brink scores (p < 0.001), FSFI scores (p < 0.05), and patients’ satisfaction (p < 0.001) were significantly increased and higher in the active group. Mild adverse effects including pain and burning sensation were not different between groups except for itch which was significantly higher in the sham arm (p = 0.014). Histology after RF + PEMF treatments demonstrated neocollagenesis, neoelastogenesis, and neoangiogenesis. In conclusion, combination RF + PEMF therapy was safe, improved vaginal laxity, strengthened pelvic floor muscles, and improved female sexual function for at least 12-week post-procedures with confirmed histological improvements. This study was registered on the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20200803002 on 2020–07-30 “retrospectively registered.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8971182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89711822022-04-07 The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial Wattanakrai, Penpun Limpjaroenviriyakul, Nattawan Thongtan, Darin Wattanayingcharoenchai, Rujira Manonai, Jittima Lasers Med Sci Original Article Non-invasive vaginal rejuvenation with radiofrequency (RF) and lasers devices have gained popularity, but well-designed studies confirming their effectiveness are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a multipolar RF and pulsed electromagnetic field-based device (PEMF) versus sham for vaginal laxity. Thirty-two premenopausal females with ≥ 1 vaginal delivery and self-reported vaginal laxity were randomized into 2 groups: active (RF + PEMF) and sham. Both groups received 3 vaginal treatments at 3-week interval. The Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire (VLQ), perineometer measurements, and Brink score were conducted at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks after treatments. Pre and post-treatment vaginal histology, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), subjects’ satisfaction, pain, and adverse events were assessed. The active group VLQ scores increased and were significantly better than the sham group (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, 50% of the active group reported no vaginal laxity (VLQ > 4) versus 12% in the sham group (p = 0.054). In the active group, all domains of perineometer measurements and Brink scores (p < 0.001), FSFI scores (p < 0.05), and patients’ satisfaction (p < 0.001) were significantly increased and higher in the active group. Mild adverse effects including pain and burning sensation were not different between groups except for itch which was significantly higher in the sham arm (p = 0.014). Histology after RF + PEMF treatments demonstrated neocollagenesis, neoelastogenesis, and neoangiogenesis. In conclusion, combination RF + PEMF therapy was safe, improved vaginal laxity, strengthened pelvic floor muscles, and improved female sexual function for at least 12-week post-procedures with confirmed histological improvements. This study was registered on the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20200803002 on 2020–07-30 “retrospectively registered.” Springer London 2021-10-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8971182/ /pubmed/34647191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03438-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wattanakrai, Penpun
Limpjaroenviriyakul, Nattawan
Thongtan, Darin
Wattanayingcharoenchai, Rujira
Manonai, Jittima
The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial
title The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial
title_full The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial
title_short The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34647191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03438-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wattanakraipenpun theefficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT limpjaroenviriyakulnattawan theefficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT thongtandarin theefficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT wattanayingcharoenchairujira theefficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT manonaijittima theefficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT wattanakraipenpun efficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT limpjaroenviriyakulnattawan efficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT thongtandarin efficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT wattanayingcharoenchairujira efficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT manonaijittima efficacyandsafetyofacombinedmultipolarradiofrequencywithpulsedelectromagneticfieldtechnologyforthetreatmentofvaginallaxityadoubleblindedrandomizedshamcontrolledtrial