Cargando…

“There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE: There is a pressing need for high-quality, comprehensive research to describe the natural history, best treatments, access to care and disparities in care for patients with childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Building on a previously published survey study of cSLE clinicians and researchers to de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cannon, Laura, Caliendo, Anne, Hersh, Aimee, Knight, Andrea M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-000659
_version_ 1784679712796180480
author Cannon, Laura
Caliendo, Anne
Hersh, Aimee
Knight, Andrea M
author_facet Cannon, Laura
Caliendo, Anne
Hersh, Aimee
Knight, Andrea M
author_sort Cannon, Laura
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is a pressing need for high-quality, comprehensive research to describe the natural history, best treatments, access to care and disparities in care for patients with childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Building on a previously published survey study of cSLE clinicians and researchers to describe research priorities in cSLE, the primary objective of this study was to conduct expert interviews to define high-priority areas for cSLE research. METHODS: Individuals with identified multidisciplinary expertise in cSLE were recruited worldwide using purposive sampling technique. Experts participated in open-ended, semistructured qualitative interviews. Interviews were designed to elicit expert perspectives on research priorities, optimal research approaches, and factors that facilitate and hinder advancing cSLE research. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and de-identified for analysis. Analysis for underlying themes of cSLE expert perspectives was performed using a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Twenty-nine experts with diverse clinical and research backgrounds participated. Themes emerged within five domains: (1) expanding disease knowledge; (2) investigator collaboration; (3) partnering with patients and families; (4) improving care to optimise research; and (5) overcoming investigator barriers. Choosing a singular area of focus was difficult; experts identified many competing priorities. Despite the numerous priorities that emerged, experts described several existing and potential opportunities for advancing cSLE research. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the priorities identified by cSLE experts in this study, the opportunities for advancing cSLE research and care that were proposed should be used as a foundation for creation of a cSLE research agenda for both research and funding allocation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8971800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89718002022-04-20 “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus Cannon, Laura Caliendo, Anne Hersh, Aimee Knight, Andrea M Lupus Sci Med Childhood Lupus OBJECTIVE: There is a pressing need for high-quality, comprehensive research to describe the natural history, best treatments, access to care and disparities in care for patients with childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Building on a previously published survey study of cSLE clinicians and researchers to describe research priorities in cSLE, the primary objective of this study was to conduct expert interviews to define high-priority areas for cSLE research. METHODS: Individuals with identified multidisciplinary expertise in cSLE were recruited worldwide using purposive sampling technique. Experts participated in open-ended, semistructured qualitative interviews. Interviews were designed to elicit expert perspectives on research priorities, optimal research approaches, and factors that facilitate and hinder advancing cSLE research. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and de-identified for analysis. Analysis for underlying themes of cSLE expert perspectives was performed using a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Twenty-nine experts with diverse clinical and research backgrounds participated. Themes emerged within five domains: (1) expanding disease knowledge; (2) investigator collaboration; (3) partnering with patients and families; (4) improving care to optimise research; and (5) overcoming investigator barriers. Choosing a singular area of focus was difficult; experts identified many competing priorities. Despite the numerous priorities that emerged, experts described several existing and potential opportunities for advancing cSLE research. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the priorities identified by cSLE experts in this study, the opportunities for advancing cSLE research and care that were proposed should be used as a foundation for creation of a cSLE research agenda for both research and funding allocation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8971800/ /pubmed/35361711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-000659 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Childhood Lupus
Cannon, Laura
Caliendo, Anne
Hersh, Aimee
Knight, Andrea M
“There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus
title “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus
title_full “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus
title_fullStr “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus
title_full_unstemmed “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus
title_short “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus
title_sort “there’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus
topic Childhood Lupus
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-000659
work_keys_str_mv AT cannonlaura theressomuchtobedoneaqualitativestudytoelucidateresearchprioritiesinchildhoodonsetsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT caliendoanne theressomuchtobedoneaqualitativestudytoelucidateresearchprioritiesinchildhoodonsetsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT hershaimee theressomuchtobedoneaqualitativestudytoelucidateresearchprioritiesinchildhoodonsetsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT knightandream theressomuchtobedoneaqualitativestudytoelucidateresearchprioritiesinchildhoodonsetsystemiclupuserythematosus