Cargando…
“There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus
OBJECTIVE: There is a pressing need for high-quality, comprehensive research to describe the natural history, best treatments, access to care and disparities in care for patients with childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Building on a previously published survey study of cSLE clinicians and researchers to de...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-000659 |
_version_ | 1784679712796180480 |
---|---|
author | Cannon, Laura Caliendo, Anne Hersh, Aimee Knight, Andrea M |
author_facet | Cannon, Laura Caliendo, Anne Hersh, Aimee Knight, Andrea M |
author_sort | Cannon, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: There is a pressing need for high-quality, comprehensive research to describe the natural history, best treatments, access to care and disparities in care for patients with childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Building on a previously published survey study of cSLE clinicians and researchers to describe research priorities in cSLE, the primary objective of this study was to conduct expert interviews to define high-priority areas for cSLE research. METHODS: Individuals with identified multidisciplinary expertise in cSLE were recruited worldwide using purposive sampling technique. Experts participated in open-ended, semistructured qualitative interviews. Interviews were designed to elicit expert perspectives on research priorities, optimal research approaches, and factors that facilitate and hinder advancing cSLE research. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and de-identified for analysis. Analysis for underlying themes of cSLE expert perspectives was performed using a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Twenty-nine experts with diverse clinical and research backgrounds participated. Themes emerged within five domains: (1) expanding disease knowledge; (2) investigator collaboration; (3) partnering with patients and families; (4) improving care to optimise research; and (5) overcoming investigator barriers. Choosing a singular area of focus was difficult; experts identified many competing priorities. Despite the numerous priorities that emerged, experts described several existing and potential opportunities for advancing cSLE research. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the priorities identified by cSLE experts in this study, the opportunities for advancing cSLE research and care that were proposed should be used as a foundation for creation of a cSLE research agenda for both research and funding allocation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8971800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89718002022-04-20 “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus Cannon, Laura Caliendo, Anne Hersh, Aimee Knight, Andrea M Lupus Sci Med Childhood Lupus OBJECTIVE: There is a pressing need for high-quality, comprehensive research to describe the natural history, best treatments, access to care and disparities in care for patients with childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Building on a previously published survey study of cSLE clinicians and researchers to describe research priorities in cSLE, the primary objective of this study was to conduct expert interviews to define high-priority areas for cSLE research. METHODS: Individuals with identified multidisciplinary expertise in cSLE were recruited worldwide using purposive sampling technique. Experts participated in open-ended, semistructured qualitative interviews. Interviews were designed to elicit expert perspectives on research priorities, optimal research approaches, and factors that facilitate and hinder advancing cSLE research. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and de-identified for analysis. Analysis for underlying themes of cSLE expert perspectives was performed using a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Twenty-nine experts with diverse clinical and research backgrounds participated. Themes emerged within five domains: (1) expanding disease knowledge; (2) investigator collaboration; (3) partnering with patients and families; (4) improving care to optimise research; and (5) overcoming investigator barriers. Choosing a singular area of focus was difficult; experts identified many competing priorities. Despite the numerous priorities that emerged, experts described several existing and potential opportunities for advancing cSLE research. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the priorities identified by cSLE experts in this study, the opportunities for advancing cSLE research and care that were proposed should be used as a foundation for creation of a cSLE research agenda for both research and funding allocation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8971800/ /pubmed/35361711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-000659 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Childhood Lupus Cannon, Laura Caliendo, Anne Hersh, Aimee Knight, Andrea M “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus |
title | “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus |
title_full | “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus |
title_fullStr | “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus |
title_full_unstemmed | “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus |
title_short | “There’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus |
title_sort | “there’s so much to be done”: a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus |
topic | Childhood Lupus |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-000659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cannonlaura theressomuchtobedoneaqualitativestudytoelucidateresearchprioritiesinchildhoodonsetsystemiclupuserythematosus AT caliendoanne theressomuchtobedoneaqualitativestudytoelucidateresearchprioritiesinchildhoodonsetsystemiclupuserythematosus AT hershaimee theressomuchtobedoneaqualitativestudytoelucidateresearchprioritiesinchildhoodonsetsystemiclupuserythematosus AT knightandream theressomuchtobedoneaqualitativestudytoelucidateresearchprioritiesinchildhoodonsetsystemiclupuserythematosus |