Cargando…

A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect

PURPOSE: The abscopal effect is defined when a form of local therapy causes tumor regression of both the target lesion and any untreated tumors. Herein cases of the abscopal effect were systematically reviewed and a patient-level data analysis was performed for clinical predictors of both duration o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatten, Steven J., Lehrer, Eric J., Liao, Jenn, Sha, Congzhou M., Trifiletti, Daniel M., Siva, Shankar, McBride, Sean M., Palma, David, Holder, Sheldon L., Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35372719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100909
_version_ 1784679720449736704
author Hatten, Steven J.
Lehrer, Eric J.
Liao, Jenn
Sha, Congzhou M.
Trifiletti, Daniel M.
Siva, Shankar
McBride, Sean M.
Palma, David
Holder, Sheldon L.
Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
author_facet Hatten, Steven J.
Lehrer, Eric J.
Liao, Jenn
Sha, Congzhou M.
Trifiletti, Daniel M.
Siva, Shankar
McBride, Sean M.
Palma, David
Holder, Sheldon L.
Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
author_sort Hatten, Steven J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The abscopal effect is defined when a form of local therapy causes tumor regression of both the target lesion and any untreated tumors. Herein cases of the abscopal effect were systematically reviewed and a patient-level data analysis was performed for clinical predictors of both duration of response and survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome, Study (PICOS) design approach, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) literature selection process, and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) were used to find articles published before September 2019 in MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were (1) population: patients with reported abscopal response; (2) intervention: documented treatment(s); (3) control: none; (4) outcomes: overall and progression-free survival; and (5) setting: retrospective case reports. Time from treatment until abscopal response and time from abscopal response until progression/death were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for survival outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty studies (n = 55 patients) were included. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-70) and 62% were male. Fifty-four (98%) patients received radiation therapy, 34 (62%) received radiation therapy alone, 5 (9.1%) underwent surgery, 4 (7.3%) received chemotherapy, and 11 (20%) received immunotherapy. Median total dose was 32 Gy (IQR, 25.5-48 Gy) and median dose per fraction was 3 Gy (IQR, 2-7.2). Median time until abscopal response was 4 months (IQR, 1-5; min 0.5, max 24). At 5 years, overall survival was 63% and distant progression-free survival was 45%. No variables had statistical significance in predicting duration of response or survival. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all reported cases of the abscopal response are after radiation therapy; however, there are no known predictors of duration of response or survival in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8971834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89718342022-04-02 A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect Hatten, Steven J. Lehrer, Eric J. Liao, Jenn Sha, Congzhou M. Trifiletti, Daniel M. Siva, Shankar McBride, Sean M. Palma, David Holder, Sheldon L. Zaorsky, Nicholas G. Adv Radiat Oncol Critical Review PURPOSE: The abscopal effect is defined when a form of local therapy causes tumor regression of both the target lesion and any untreated tumors. Herein cases of the abscopal effect were systematically reviewed and a patient-level data analysis was performed for clinical predictors of both duration of response and survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome, Study (PICOS) design approach, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) literature selection process, and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) were used to find articles published before September 2019 in MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were (1) population: patients with reported abscopal response; (2) intervention: documented treatment(s); (3) control: none; (4) outcomes: overall and progression-free survival; and (5) setting: retrospective case reports. Time from treatment until abscopal response and time from abscopal response until progression/death were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for survival outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty studies (n = 55 patients) were included. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-70) and 62% were male. Fifty-four (98%) patients received radiation therapy, 34 (62%) received radiation therapy alone, 5 (9.1%) underwent surgery, 4 (7.3%) received chemotherapy, and 11 (20%) received immunotherapy. Median total dose was 32 Gy (IQR, 25.5-48 Gy) and median dose per fraction was 3 Gy (IQR, 2-7.2). Median time until abscopal response was 4 months (IQR, 1-5; min 0.5, max 24). At 5 years, overall survival was 63% and distant progression-free survival was 45%. No variables had statistical significance in predicting duration of response or survival. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all reported cases of the abscopal response are after radiation therapy; however, there are no known predictors of duration of response or survival in this population. Elsevier 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8971834/ /pubmed/35372719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100909 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Critical Review
Hatten, Steven J.
Lehrer, Eric J.
Liao, Jenn
Sha, Congzhou M.
Trifiletti, Daniel M.
Siva, Shankar
McBride, Sean M.
Palma, David
Holder, Sheldon L.
Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect
title A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect
title_full A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect
title_fullStr A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect
title_full_unstemmed A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect
title_short A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect
title_sort patient-level data meta-analysis of the abscopal effect
topic Critical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35372719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100909
work_keys_str_mv AT hattenstevenj apatientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT lehrerericj apatientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT liaojenn apatientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT shacongzhoum apatientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT trifilettidanielm apatientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT sivashankar apatientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT mcbrideseanm apatientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT palmadavid apatientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT holdersheldonl apatientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT zaorskynicholasg apatientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT hattenstevenj patientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT lehrerericj patientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT liaojenn patientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT shacongzhoum patientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT trifilettidanielm patientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT sivashankar patientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT mcbrideseanm patientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT palmadavid patientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT holdersheldonl patientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect
AT zaorskynicholasg patientleveldatametaanalysisoftheabscopaleffect