Cargando…

Male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to systematically review published literature on male–female differences in presentation, management and outcomes in patients diagnosed with acute thoracic aortic dissection (AD). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between 1 Januar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meccanici, Frederike, Gökalp, Arjen L, Thijssen, Carlijn G E, Mokhles, Mostafa M, Bekkers, Jos A, van Kimmenade, Roland, Verhagen, Hence J, Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W, Takkenberg, Johanna J M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8972321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34664071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivab270
_version_ 1784679811949527040
author Meccanici, Frederike
Gökalp, Arjen L
Thijssen, Carlijn G E
Mokhles, Mostafa M
Bekkers, Jos A
van Kimmenade, Roland
Verhagen, Hence J
Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W
Takkenberg, Johanna J M
author_facet Meccanici, Frederike
Gökalp, Arjen L
Thijssen, Carlijn G E
Mokhles, Mostafa M
Bekkers, Jos A
van Kimmenade, Roland
Verhagen, Hence J
Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W
Takkenberg, Johanna J M
author_sort Meccanici, Frederike
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to systematically review published literature on male–female differences in presentation, management and outcomes in patients diagnosed with acute thoracic aortic dissection (AD). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between 1 January 1999 and 19 October 2020 investigating mortality and morbidity in adult patients diagnosed with AD. Patient and treatment characteristics were compared with odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences and a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed for early mortality. Overall survival and reoperation were visualized by pooled Kaplan–Meier curves. RESULTS: Nine studies investigating type A dissections (AD-A), 1 investigating type B dissections (AD-B) and 3 investigating both AD-A and AD-B were included encompassing 18 659 patients. Males were younger in both AD-A (P < 0.001) and AD-B (P < 0.001), and in AD-A patients males had more distally extended dissections [OR 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46–0.70; P < 0.001]. Longer operation times were observed for males in AD-A (standardized mean difference 0.29, 95% CI 0.17–0.41; P < 0.001) while male patients were less often treated conservatively in AD-B (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.58–0.72; P < 0.001). The pooled early mortality risk ratio for males versus females was 0.94 (95% CI 0.84–1.06, P = 0.308) in AD-A and 0.92 (95% CI 0.83–1.03, P = 0.143) in AD-B. Pooled overall mortality in AD-A showed no male–female difference, whereas male patients had more reinterventions during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows male–female differences in AD patient and treatment characteristics, comparable early and overall mortality and inconsistent outcome reporting. As published literature is scarce and heterogeneous, large prospective studies with standardized reporting of male–female characteristics and outcomes are clearly warranted. Improved knowledge of male–female differences in AD will help shape optimal individualized care for both males and females. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO, ID number: CRD42020155926.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8972321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89723212022-04-01 Male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis Meccanici, Frederike Gökalp, Arjen L Thijssen, Carlijn G E Mokhles, Mostafa M Bekkers, Jos A van Kimmenade, Roland Verhagen, Hence J Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W Takkenberg, Johanna J M Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Vascular OBJECTIVES: This study aims to systematically review published literature on male–female differences in presentation, management and outcomes in patients diagnosed with acute thoracic aortic dissection (AD). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between 1 January 1999 and 19 October 2020 investigating mortality and morbidity in adult patients diagnosed with AD. Patient and treatment characteristics were compared with odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences and a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed for early mortality. Overall survival and reoperation were visualized by pooled Kaplan–Meier curves. RESULTS: Nine studies investigating type A dissections (AD-A), 1 investigating type B dissections (AD-B) and 3 investigating both AD-A and AD-B were included encompassing 18 659 patients. Males were younger in both AD-A (P < 0.001) and AD-B (P < 0.001), and in AD-A patients males had more distally extended dissections [OR 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46–0.70; P < 0.001]. Longer operation times were observed for males in AD-A (standardized mean difference 0.29, 95% CI 0.17–0.41; P < 0.001) while male patients were less often treated conservatively in AD-B (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.58–0.72; P < 0.001). The pooled early mortality risk ratio for males versus females was 0.94 (95% CI 0.84–1.06, P = 0.308) in AD-A and 0.92 (95% CI 0.83–1.03, P = 0.143) in AD-B. Pooled overall mortality in AD-A showed no male–female difference, whereas male patients had more reinterventions during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows male–female differences in AD patient and treatment characteristics, comparable early and overall mortality and inconsistent outcome reporting. As published literature is scarce and heterogeneous, large prospective studies with standardized reporting of male–female characteristics and outcomes are clearly warranted. Improved knowledge of male–female differences in AD will help shape optimal individualized care for both males and females. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO, ID number: CRD42020155926. Oxford University Press 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8972321/ /pubmed/34664071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivab270 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Vascular
Meccanici, Frederike
Gökalp, Arjen L
Thijssen, Carlijn G E
Mokhles, Mostafa M
Bekkers, Jos A
van Kimmenade, Roland
Verhagen, Hence J
Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W
Takkenberg, Johanna J M
Male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Vascular
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8972321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34664071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivab270
work_keys_str_mv AT meccanicifrederike malefemaledifferencesinacutethoracicaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gokalparjenl malefemaledifferencesinacutethoracicaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thijssencarlijnge malefemaledifferencesinacutethoracicaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mokhlesmostafam malefemaledifferencesinacutethoracicaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bekkersjosa malefemaledifferencesinacutethoracicaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vankimmenaderoland malefemaledifferencesinacutethoracicaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT verhagenhencej malefemaledifferencesinacutethoracicaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rooshesselinkjolienw malefemaledifferencesinacutethoracicaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT takkenbergjohannajm malefemaledifferencesinacutethoracicaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis