Cargando…

Dentin Thickness at Danger Zone and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Molars

OBJECTIVES: Dentin thickness in concave areas of the root creates risk for complications such as strip perforation during endodontic treatment. The study aims to examine dentin thickness of the danger (DZ) and safety zone (SZ), canal configuration, and the presence of isthmus in the mesiobuccal root...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yanık, Deniz, Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8972479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382485
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc56/1/6
_version_ 1784679848842625024
author Yanık, Deniz
Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert
author_facet Yanık, Deniz
Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert
author_sort Yanık, Deniz
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Dentin thickness in concave areas of the root creates risk for complications such as strip perforation during endodontic treatment. The study aims to examine dentin thickness of the danger (DZ) and safety zone (SZ), canal configuration, and the presence of isthmus in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images of 1251 teeth belonging to 642 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The dentin thicknesses at DZ and SZ in maxillary molars with one (MB) or two mesiobuccal canals (MB1, MB2) were measured at the 3 mm apical to the furcation level. Vertucci's canal configurations and the isthmus rate were recorded. The Chi-square test andThe Student’s t-test were performed. RESULTS: MB2 rate was higher in maxillary first molars (61.68%) than second molars (39.36%). Isthmus rates were 27.3% and 44.11% in first and second molars. DZ thickness was thinner than the dentin thickness in the SZ in both first and second molars with one or two mesial canals (p< 0.05). In teeth with single canal, the mean DZ thickness was 0.88mm. In teeth with two canals, the mean DZ thicknesses were 0.83mm and 0.80mm for MB1 and MB2 canals, respectively. CONCLUSION: MB2 rate was higher in the first molar (61.68%), and the isthmus rate was higher in the second molar (44.11%). DZ and SZ were thinner in MB2 than in MB1 at the maxillary molars with two mesial canals. The results indicated that more conservative preparation must be applied to the MB2 canal in the maxillary molars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8972479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89724792022-04-04 Dentin Thickness at Danger Zone and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Molars Yanık, Deniz Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert Acta Stomatol Croat Original Scientific Papers OBJECTIVES: Dentin thickness in concave areas of the root creates risk for complications such as strip perforation during endodontic treatment. The study aims to examine dentin thickness of the danger (DZ) and safety zone (SZ), canal configuration, and the presence of isthmus in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images of 1251 teeth belonging to 642 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The dentin thicknesses at DZ and SZ in maxillary molars with one (MB) or two mesiobuccal canals (MB1, MB2) were measured at the 3 mm apical to the furcation level. Vertucci's canal configurations and the isthmus rate were recorded. The Chi-square test andThe Student’s t-test were performed. RESULTS: MB2 rate was higher in maxillary first molars (61.68%) than second molars (39.36%). Isthmus rates were 27.3% and 44.11% in first and second molars. DZ thickness was thinner than the dentin thickness in the SZ in both first and second molars with one or two mesial canals (p< 0.05). In teeth with single canal, the mean DZ thickness was 0.88mm. In teeth with two canals, the mean DZ thicknesses were 0.83mm and 0.80mm for MB1 and MB2 canals, respectively. CONCLUSION: MB2 rate was higher in the first molar (61.68%), and the isthmus rate was higher in the second molar (44.11%). DZ and SZ were thinner in MB2 than in MB1 at the maxillary molars with two mesial canals. The results indicated that more conservative preparation must be applied to the MB2 canal in the maxillary molars. University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8972479/ /pubmed/35382485 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc56/1/6 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Yanık, Deniz
Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert
Dentin Thickness at Danger Zone and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Molars
title Dentin Thickness at Danger Zone and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Molars
title_full Dentin Thickness at Danger Zone and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Molars
title_fullStr Dentin Thickness at Danger Zone and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Molars
title_full_unstemmed Dentin Thickness at Danger Zone and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Molars
title_short Dentin Thickness at Danger Zone and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Molars
title_sort dentin thickness at danger zone and canal morphology of maxillary molars
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8972479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382485
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc56/1/6
work_keys_str_mv AT yanıkdeniz dentinthicknessatdangerzoneandcanalmorphologyofmaxillarymolars
AT nalbantogluahmetmert dentinthicknessatdangerzoneandcanalmorphologyofmaxillarymolars