Cargando…
Response—The Road Less Travelled: Why did Miles Little Turn to Qualitative Research and Where Did This Lead?
Miles Little is an Australian surgeon, poet, and philosopher whose published work spans diverse topics in surgery, medicine, philosophy, and bioethics. In 1974 he co-authored a survey that included an analysis of interviews conducted with amputees. This was his first foray into qualitative research....
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8972637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35362923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10142-y |
_version_ | 1784679887175417856 |
---|---|
author | Jordens, Christopher F.C. |
author_facet | Jordens, Christopher F.C. |
author_sort | Jordens, Christopher F.C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Miles Little is an Australian surgeon, poet, and philosopher whose published work spans diverse topics in surgery, medicine, philosophy, and bioethics. In 1974 he co-authored a survey that included an analysis of interviews conducted with amputees. This was his first foray into qualitative research. Twenty years later he established a research centre at the University of Sydney that initiated a programme of qualitative research in cancer medicine. For twenty years after that, the centre acted as a hub for research that applied qualitative methods from the social sciences to study the experiences of people who endure illness and onerous treatments and to reveal their evaluations of what medicine does to and for them. This essay explains why Little turned to qualitative research instead of pursuing two other research paradigms that were better established in the 1990s, namely, evidence-based medicine and quality-of-life research. It also notes a development in qualitative research methods that Little’s legacy helps to explain, one which can augment the symbolic power of socially marginalized individuals and groups. With reference to a current controversy in surgery, I argue that Little’s survey of amputees models a laudable response to criticism, and in this respect, it is still relevant today. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8972637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89726372022-04-01 Response—The Road Less Travelled: Why did Miles Little Turn to Qualitative Research and Where Did This Lead? Jordens, Christopher F.C. J Bioeth Inq Symposium: Legacy of Miles Little Miles Little is an Australian surgeon, poet, and philosopher whose published work spans diverse topics in surgery, medicine, philosophy, and bioethics. In 1974 he co-authored a survey that included an analysis of interviews conducted with amputees. This was his first foray into qualitative research. Twenty years later he established a research centre at the University of Sydney that initiated a programme of qualitative research in cancer medicine. For twenty years after that, the centre acted as a hub for research that applied qualitative methods from the social sciences to study the experiences of people who endure illness and onerous treatments and to reveal their evaluations of what medicine does to and for them. This essay explains why Little turned to qualitative research instead of pursuing two other research paradigms that were better established in the 1990s, namely, evidence-based medicine and quality-of-life research. It also notes a development in qualitative research methods that Little’s legacy helps to explain, one which can augment the symbolic power of socially marginalized individuals and groups. With reference to a current controversy in surgery, I argue that Little’s survey of amputees models a laudable response to criticism, and in this respect, it is still relevant today. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-04-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8972637/ /pubmed/35362923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10142-y Text en © Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Symposium: Legacy of Miles Little Jordens, Christopher F.C. Response—The Road Less Travelled: Why did Miles Little Turn to Qualitative Research and Where Did This Lead? |
title | Response—The Road Less Travelled: Why did Miles Little Turn to Qualitative Research and Where Did This Lead? |
title_full | Response—The Road Less Travelled: Why did Miles Little Turn to Qualitative Research and Where Did This Lead? |
title_fullStr | Response—The Road Less Travelled: Why did Miles Little Turn to Qualitative Research and Where Did This Lead? |
title_full_unstemmed | Response—The Road Less Travelled: Why did Miles Little Turn to Qualitative Research and Where Did This Lead? |
title_short | Response—The Road Less Travelled: Why did Miles Little Turn to Qualitative Research and Where Did This Lead? |
title_sort | response—the road less travelled: why did miles little turn to qualitative research and where did this lead? |
topic | Symposium: Legacy of Miles Little |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8972637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35362923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10142-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jordenschristopherfc responsetheroadlesstravelledwhydidmileslittleturntoqualitativeresearchandwheredidthislead |