Cargando…

Diagnosis and Localization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea results from abnormal communications between the subarachnoid and sinonasal spaces. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and localization are vital for positive clinical outcomes. However, the diagnosis and localization of CSF rhinorrhea remain suboptimal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Michael, Zhou, Kelvin, Kachra, Shamez, McHugh, Tobial, Sommer, Doron D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8972957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19458924211060918
_version_ 1784679959691788288
author Xie, Michael
Zhou, Kelvin
Kachra, Shamez
McHugh, Tobial
Sommer, Doron D.
author_facet Xie, Michael
Zhou, Kelvin
Kachra, Shamez
McHugh, Tobial
Sommer, Doron D.
author_sort Xie, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea results from abnormal communications between the subarachnoid and sinonasal spaces. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and localization are vital for positive clinical outcomes. However, the diagnosis and localization of CSF rhinorrhea remain suboptimal due to a lack of accurate understanding of test characteristics. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of various tests and imaging modalities for diagnosing and localizing CSF rhinorrhea. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Our search identified 4039 articles—53 cohort studies and 24 case series describing 1622 patients were included. The studies were heterogeneous and had a wide range of sensitivities and specificities. Many specificities were incalculable due to a lack of true negative and false positive results, thus precluding a meta-analysis. Median sensitivities and specificities were calculated for cohort studies of the following investigations: high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) 0.93/0.50 (sensitivity/specificity), magnetic resonance cisternography (MRC) 0.94/0.77, computed tomography cisternography (CTC) 0.95/1.00, radionuclide cisternography (RNC) 0.90/0.50, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cisternography (CEMRC) 0.99/1.00, endoscopy 0.58/1.00, topical intranasal fluorescein (TIF) 1.00/incalculable, intrathecal fluorescein (ITF) 0.96/1.00. Case series were reviewed separately. Etiology and site-specific data were also analyzed. CONCLUSION: MR cisternography is more accurate than high-resolution CT at diagnosing and localizing CSF rhinorrhea. CT cisternography, contrast-enhanced MR cisternography, and radionuclide cisternography have good diagnostic characteristics but are invasive. Intrathecal fluorescein shows promising data but has not been widely adopted for purely diagnostic use. Office endoscopy has limited data but does not sufficiently diagnose CSF rhinorrhea independently. These findings confirm with current guidelines and evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8972957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89729572022-04-02 Diagnosis and Localization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review Xie, Michael Zhou, Kelvin Kachra, Shamez McHugh, Tobial Sommer, Doron D. Am J Rhinol Allergy Reviews BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea results from abnormal communications between the subarachnoid and sinonasal spaces. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and localization are vital for positive clinical outcomes. However, the diagnosis and localization of CSF rhinorrhea remain suboptimal due to a lack of accurate understanding of test characteristics. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of various tests and imaging modalities for diagnosing and localizing CSF rhinorrhea. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Our search identified 4039 articles—53 cohort studies and 24 case series describing 1622 patients were included. The studies were heterogeneous and had a wide range of sensitivities and specificities. Many specificities were incalculable due to a lack of true negative and false positive results, thus precluding a meta-analysis. Median sensitivities and specificities were calculated for cohort studies of the following investigations: high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) 0.93/0.50 (sensitivity/specificity), magnetic resonance cisternography (MRC) 0.94/0.77, computed tomography cisternography (CTC) 0.95/1.00, radionuclide cisternography (RNC) 0.90/0.50, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cisternography (CEMRC) 0.99/1.00, endoscopy 0.58/1.00, topical intranasal fluorescein (TIF) 1.00/incalculable, intrathecal fluorescein (ITF) 0.96/1.00. Case series were reviewed separately. Etiology and site-specific data were also analyzed. CONCLUSION: MR cisternography is more accurate than high-resolution CT at diagnosing and localizing CSF rhinorrhea. CT cisternography, contrast-enhanced MR cisternography, and radionuclide cisternography have good diagnostic characteristics but are invasive. Intrathecal fluorescein shows promising data but has not been widely adopted for purely diagnostic use. Office endoscopy has limited data but does not sufficiently diagnose CSF rhinorrhea independently. These findings confirm with current guidelines and evidence. SAGE Publications 2021-11-30 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8972957/ /pubmed/34846218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19458924211060918 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Reviews
Xie, Michael
Zhou, Kelvin
Kachra, Shamez
McHugh, Tobial
Sommer, Doron D.
Diagnosis and Localization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review
title Diagnosis and Localization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review
title_full Diagnosis and Localization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Diagnosis and Localization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis and Localization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review
title_short Diagnosis and Localization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review
title_sort diagnosis and localization of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8972957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19458924211060918
work_keys_str_mv AT xiemichael diagnosisandlocalizationofcerebrospinalfluidrhinorrheaasystematicreview
AT zhoukelvin diagnosisandlocalizationofcerebrospinalfluidrhinorrheaasystematicreview
AT kachrashamez diagnosisandlocalizationofcerebrospinalfluidrhinorrheaasystematicreview
AT mchughtobial diagnosisandlocalizationofcerebrospinalfluidrhinorrheaasystematicreview
AT sommerdorond diagnosisandlocalizationofcerebrospinalfluidrhinorrheaasystematicreview