Cargando…

Three-Dimensional Supramolecular Architectures with Mn(II) Ions Assembled from Hydrogen Bonding Interactions: Crystal Structures and Antiferromagnetic Properties

[Image: see text] Two novel cocrystal Mn(II) compounds were successfully synthesized. The composition of two kinds crystals correspond to [Mn(hfac)(2)L(a)(2)·Mn(hfac)(2)L(a)(H(2)O)·Mn(hfac)(2)(H(2)O)(2)] (1) and [Mn(hfac)(2)L(b)(2)·Mn(hfac)(2)(H(2)O)(2)·0.5(C(6)H(14))] (2) [L(a) = 1,3-bis(1′-oxyl-3′...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Yan-Li, Wang, Yufei, Gao, Liguo, Li, Jian, Wang, Yali, Inoue, Katsuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05285
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] Two novel cocrystal Mn(II) compounds were successfully synthesized. The composition of two kinds crystals correspond to [Mn(hfac)(2)L(a)(2)·Mn(hfac)(2)L(a)(H(2)O)·Mn(hfac)(2)(H(2)O)(2)] (1) and [Mn(hfac)(2)L(b)(2)·Mn(hfac)(2)(H(2)O)(2)·0.5(C(6)H(14))] (2) [L(a) = 1,3-bis(1′-oxyl-3′-oxido-4′,4′,5′,5′-tetramethyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-y1)benzene; L(b) = 1-(1′-oxyl-4′,4′,5′,5′-tetramethylimidazolin-2-yl)-3-(1′-oxyl-3′-oxo-4′,4′,5′,5′-tetramethylimidazolin-2-yl)benzene; hfac = hexafluoroacetylacetonato). Surprisingly, the compounds were not polymeric or clusters but, more interestingly, different ratio biradical–metal coordination compound cocrystals. The extensive intramolecular H-bonds are the cause of formation of the cocrystal structures by assembly in the two manganese(II) derivatives; and another factor is the halogen bonds between CF(3) of hfac groups. Furthermore, three-dimensional supramolecular architectures were formed. The magnetic susceptibility of both compounds showed strong antiferromagnetic interactions involving the coordinated radical unit and the metal and lesser contribution from ferromagnetic interactions between the radical units. For compound 1, a good fit was obtained for g(Mn) = 2.08, g(rad) = 2.00 (fixed), J(1) = −294.3 cm(–1), J(2) = 6.2 cm(–1) and J(3) = 10.8 cm(–1). A reasonable fit for compound 2 was obtained for g(Mn) = 2.04, g(rad) = 2.00 (fixed), J(1)′ = −273.4 cm(–1) and J(2)′ = 8.6 cm(–1).