Cargando…

A Path to Qualification of PET/MRI Scanners for Multicenter Brain Imaging Studies: Evaluation of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction Methods Using a Patient Phantom

PET/MRI scanners cannot be qualified in the manner adopted for hybrid PET/CT devices. The main hurdle with qualification in PET/MRI is that attenuation correction (AC) cannot be adequately measured in conventional PET phantoms because of the difficulty in converting the MR images of the physical str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Catana, Ciprian, Laforest, Richard, An, Hongyu, Boada, Fernando, Cao, Tuoyu, Faul, David, Jakoby, Bjoern, Jansen, Floris P., Kemp, Bradley J., Kinahan, Paul E., Larson, Peder, Levine, Michael A., Maniawski, Piotr, Mawlawi, Osama, McConathy, Jonathan E., McMillan, Alan B., Price, Julie C., Rajagopal, Abhejit, Sunderland, John, Veit-Haibach, Patrick, Wangerin, Kristen A., Ying, Chunwei, Hope, Thomas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Nuclear Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34301784
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.261881
_version_ 1784680016419749888
author Catana, Ciprian
Laforest, Richard
An, Hongyu
Boada, Fernando
Cao, Tuoyu
Faul, David
Jakoby, Bjoern
Jansen, Floris P.
Kemp, Bradley J.
Kinahan, Paul E.
Larson, Peder
Levine, Michael A.
Maniawski, Piotr
Mawlawi, Osama
McConathy, Jonathan E.
McMillan, Alan B.
Price, Julie C.
Rajagopal, Abhejit
Sunderland, John
Veit-Haibach, Patrick
Wangerin, Kristen A.
Ying, Chunwei
Hope, Thomas A.
author_facet Catana, Ciprian
Laforest, Richard
An, Hongyu
Boada, Fernando
Cao, Tuoyu
Faul, David
Jakoby, Bjoern
Jansen, Floris P.
Kemp, Bradley J.
Kinahan, Paul E.
Larson, Peder
Levine, Michael A.
Maniawski, Piotr
Mawlawi, Osama
McConathy, Jonathan E.
McMillan, Alan B.
Price, Julie C.
Rajagopal, Abhejit
Sunderland, John
Veit-Haibach, Patrick
Wangerin, Kristen A.
Ying, Chunwei
Hope, Thomas A.
author_sort Catana, Ciprian
collection PubMed
description PET/MRI scanners cannot be qualified in the manner adopted for hybrid PET/CT devices. The main hurdle with qualification in PET/MRI is that attenuation correction (AC) cannot be adequately measured in conventional PET phantoms because of the difficulty in converting the MR images of the physical structures (e.g., plastic) into electron density maps. Over the last decade, a plethora of novel MRI-based algorithms has been developed to more accurately derive the attenuation properties of the human head, including the skull. Although promising, none of these techniques has yet emerged as an optimal and universally adopted strategy for AC in PET/MRI. In this work, we propose a path for PET/MRI qualification for multicenter brain imaging studies. Specifically, our solution is to separate the head AC from the other factors that affect PET data quantification and use a patient as a phantom to assess the former. The emission data collected on the integrated PET/MRI scanner to be qualified should be reconstructed using both MRI- and CT-based AC methods, and whole-brain qualitative and quantitative (both voxelwise and regional) analyses should be performed. The MRI-based approach will be considered satisfactory if the PET quantification bias is within the acceptance criteria specified here. We have implemented this approach successfully across 2 PET/MRI scanner manufacturers at 2 sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8973286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Society of Nuclear Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89732862022-04-15 A Path to Qualification of PET/MRI Scanners for Multicenter Brain Imaging Studies: Evaluation of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction Methods Using a Patient Phantom Catana, Ciprian Laforest, Richard An, Hongyu Boada, Fernando Cao, Tuoyu Faul, David Jakoby, Bjoern Jansen, Floris P. Kemp, Bradley J. Kinahan, Paul E. Larson, Peder Levine, Michael A. Maniawski, Piotr Mawlawi, Osama McConathy, Jonathan E. McMillan, Alan B. Price, Julie C. Rajagopal, Abhejit Sunderland, John Veit-Haibach, Patrick Wangerin, Kristen A. Ying, Chunwei Hope, Thomas A. J Nucl Med Special Contribution PET/MRI scanners cannot be qualified in the manner adopted for hybrid PET/CT devices. The main hurdle with qualification in PET/MRI is that attenuation correction (AC) cannot be adequately measured in conventional PET phantoms because of the difficulty in converting the MR images of the physical structures (e.g., plastic) into electron density maps. Over the last decade, a plethora of novel MRI-based algorithms has been developed to more accurately derive the attenuation properties of the human head, including the skull. Although promising, none of these techniques has yet emerged as an optimal and universally adopted strategy for AC in PET/MRI. In this work, we propose a path for PET/MRI qualification for multicenter brain imaging studies. Specifically, our solution is to separate the head AC from the other factors that affect PET data quantification and use a patient as a phantom to assess the former. The emission data collected on the integrated PET/MRI scanner to be qualified should be reconstructed using both MRI- and CT-based AC methods, and whole-brain qualitative and quantitative (both voxelwise and regional) analyses should be performed. The MRI-based approach will be considered satisfactory if the PET quantification bias is within the acceptance criteria specified here. We have implemented this approach successfully across 2 PET/MRI scanner manufacturers at 2 sites. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8973286/ /pubmed/34301784 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.261881 Text en © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.
spellingShingle Special Contribution
Catana, Ciprian
Laforest, Richard
An, Hongyu
Boada, Fernando
Cao, Tuoyu
Faul, David
Jakoby, Bjoern
Jansen, Floris P.
Kemp, Bradley J.
Kinahan, Paul E.
Larson, Peder
Levine, Michael A.
Maniawski, Piotr
Mawlawi, Osama
McConathy, Jonathan E.
McMillan, Alan B.
Price, Julie C.
Rajagopal, Abhejit
Sunderland, John
Veit-Haibach, Patrick
Wangerin, Kristen A.
Ying, Chunwei
Hope, Thomas A.
A Path to Qualification of PET/MRI Scanners for Multicenter Brain Imaging Studies: Evaluation of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction Methods Using a Patient Phantom
title A Path to Qualification of PET/MRI Scanners for Multicenter Brain Imaging Studies: Evaluation of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction Methods Using a Patient Phantom
title_full A Path to Qualification of PET/MRI Scanners for Multicenter Brain Imaging Studies: Evaluation of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction Methods Using a Patient Phantom
title_fullStr A Path to Qualification of PET/MRI Scanners for Multicenter Brain Imaging Studies: Evaluation of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction Methods Using a Patient Phantom
title_full_unstemmed A Path to Qualification of PET/MRI Scanners for Multicenter Brain Imaging Studies: Evaluation of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction Methods Using a Patient Phantom
title_short A Path to Qualification of PET/MRI Scanners for Multicenter Brain Imaging Studies: Evaluation of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction Methods Using a Patient Phantom
title_sort path to qualification of pet/mri scanners for multicenter brain imaging studies: evaluation of mri-based attenuation correction methods using a patient phantom
topic Special Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34301784
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.261881
work_keys_str_mv AT catanaciprian apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT laforestrichard apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT anhongyu apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT boadafernando apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT caotuoyu apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT fauldavid apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT jakobybjoern apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT jansenflorisp apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT kempbradleyj apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT kinahanpaule apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT larsonpeder apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT levinemichaela apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT maniawskipiotr apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT mawlawiosama apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT mcconathyjonathane apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT mcmillanalanb apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT pricejuliec apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT rajagopalabhejit apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT sunderlandjohn apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT veithaibachpatrick apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT wangerinkristena apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT yingchunwei apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT hopethomasa apathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT catanaciprian pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT laforestrichard pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT anhongyu pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT boadafernando pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT caotuoyu pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT fauldavid pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT jakobybjoern pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT jansenflorisp pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT kempbradleyj pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT kinahanpaule pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT larsonpeder pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT levinemichaela pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT maniawskipiotr pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT mawlawiosama pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT mcconathyjonathane pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT mcmillanalanb pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT pricejuliec pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT rajagopalabhejit pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT sunderlandjohn pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT veithaibachpatrick pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT wangerinkristena pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT yingchunwei pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom
AT hopethomasa pathtoqualificationofpetmriscannersformulticenterbrainimagingstudiesevaluationofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsusingapatientphantom