Cargando…

Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pulmonary embolism (PE) perfusion-only screening (POS) protocol introduced during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic surge. Subjects without dense parenchymal lung opacities were studied; those with less than 1 segmental perfusion defect were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Arun, Moadel, Renée M., Haramati, Linda B., Ye, Kenny, Freeman, Leonard M., Zuckier, Lionel S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Nuclear Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353874
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262580
_version_ 1784680016933552128
author Kumar, Arun
Moadel, Renée M.
Haramati, Linda B.
Ye, Kenny
Freeman, Leonard M.
Zuckier, Lionel S.
author_facet Kumar, Arun
Moadel, Renée M.
Haramati, Linda B.
Ye, Kenny
Freeman, Leonard M.
Zuckier, Lionel S.
author_sort Kumar, Arun
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pulmonary embolism (PE) perfusion-only screening (POS) protocol introduced during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic surge. Subjects without dense parenchymal lung opacities were studied; those with less than 1 segmental perfusion defect were considered to have no PE, whereas those exhibiting 1 or more defects were indeterminate, mandating additional examinations to determine the final diagnosis. Methods: We analyzed demographic information, clinical data, imaging findings, and follow-up data from the electronic records of COVID-19 patients who underwent lung scintigraphy during the 60-d study period. Results: In total, 53 studies were performed on 17 COVID-19–positive and 36 COVID-19–negative patients. The POS protocol efficiently excluded PE in 79% of cases; the remaining 21%, indeterminate for PE, were generally referred for alternative testing or were directly anticoagulated. In patients with negative POS results, there was a very low mortality before hospital discharge (1/42) and normal results on follow-up studies (6/6). Conclusion: The POS protocol, implemented during the COVID-19 surge, efficiently and safely excluded PE in 79% of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8973288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Society of Nuclear Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89732882022-04-15 Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge Kumar, Arun Moadel, Renée M. Haramati, Linda B. Ye, Kenny Freeman, Leonard M. Zuckier, Lionel S. J Nucl Med Brief Communication The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pulmonary embolism (PE) perfusion-only screening (POS) protocol introduced during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic surge. Subjects without dense parenchymal lung opacities were studied; those with less than 1 segmental perfusion defect were considered to have no PE, whereas those exhibiting 1 or more defects were indeterminate, mandating additional examinations to determine the final diagnosis. Methods: We analyzed demographic information, clinical data, imaging findings, and follow-up data from the electronic records of COVID-19 patients who underwent lung scintigraphy during the 60-d study period. Results: In total, 53 studies were performed on 17 COVID-19–positive and 36 COVID-19–negative patients. The POS protocol efficiently excluded PE in 79% of cases; the remaining 21%, indeterminate for PE, were generally referred for alternative testing or were directly anticoagulated. In patients with negative POS results, there was a very low mortality before hospital discharge (1/42) and normal results on follow-up studies (6/6). Conclusion: The POS protocol, implemented during the COVID-19 surge, efficiently and safely excluded PE in 79% of patients. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8973288/ /pubmed/34353874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262580 Text en © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Kumar, Arun
Moadel, Renée M.
Haramati, Linda B.
Ye, Kenny
Freeman, Leonard M.
Zuckier, Lionel S.
Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge
title Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge
title_full Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge
title_fullStr Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge
title_full_unstemmed Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge
title_short Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge
title_sort experience with a perfusion-only screening protocol for evaluation of pulmonary embolism during the covid-19 pandemic surge
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353874
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262580
work_keys_str_mv AT kumararun experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge
AT moadelreneem experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge
AT haramatilindab experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge
AT yekenny experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge
AT freemanleonardm experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge
AT zuckierlionels experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge