Cargando…
Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pulmonary embolism (PE) perfusion-only screening (POS) protocol introduced during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic surge. Subjects without dense parenchymal lung opacities were studied; those with less than 1 segmental perfusion defect were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Nuclear Medicine
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262580 |
_version_ | 1784680016933552128 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Arun Moadel, Renée M. Haramati, Linda B. Ye, Kenny Freeman, Leonard M. Zuckier, Lionel S. |
author_facet | Kumar, Arun Moadel, Renée M. Haramati, Linda B. Ye, Kenny Freeman, Leonard M. Zuckier, Lionel S. |
author_sort | Kumar, Arun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pulmonary embolism (PE) perfusion-only screening (POS) protocol introduced during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic surge. Subjects without dense parenchymal lung opacities were studied; those with less than 1 segmental perfusion defect were considered to have no PE, whereas those exhibiting 1 or more defects were indeterminate, mandating additional examinations to determine the final diagnosis. Methods: We analyzed demographic information, clinical data, imaging findings, and follow-up data from the electronic records of COVID-19 patients who underwent lung scintigraphy during the 60-d study period. Results: In total, 53 studies were performed on 17 COVID-19–positive and 36 COVID-19–negative patients. The POS protocol efficiently excluded PE in 79% of cases; the remaining 21%, indeterminate for PE, were generally referred for alternative testing or were directly anticoagulated. In patients with negative POS results, there was a very low mortality before hospital discharge (1/42) and normal results on follow-up studies (6/6). Conclusion: The POS protocol, implemented during the COVID-19 surge, efficiently and safely excluded PE in 79% of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8973288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Society of Nuclear Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89732882022-04-15 Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge Kumar, Arun Moadel, Renée M. Haramati, Linda B. Ye, Kenny Freeman, Leonard M. Zuckier, Lionel S. J Nucl Med Brief Communication The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pulmonary embolism (PE) perfusion-only screening (POS) protocol introduced during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic surge. Subjects without dense parenchymal lung opacities were studied; those with less than 1 segmental perfusion defect were considered to have no PE, whereas those exhibiting 1 or more defects were indeterminate, mandating additional examinations to determine the final diagnosis. Methods: We analyzed demographic information, clinical data, imaging findings, and follow-up data from the electronic records of COVID-19 patients who underwent lung scintigraphy during the 60-d study period. Results: In total, 53 studies were performed on 17 COVID-19–positive and 36 COVID-19–negative patients. The POS protocol efficiently excluded PE in 79% of cases; the remaining 21%, indeterminate for PE, were generally referred for alternative testing or were directly anticoagulated. In patients with negative POS results, there was a very low mortality before hospital discharge (1/42) and normal results on follow-up studies (6/6). Conclusion: The POS protocol, implemented during the COVID-19 surge, efficiently and safely excluded PE in 79% of patients. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8973288/ /pubmed/34353874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262580 Text en © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Kumar, Arun Moadel, Renée M. Haramati, Linda B. Ye, Kenny Freeman, Leonard M. Zuckier, Lionel S. Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge |
title | Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge |
title_full | Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge |
title_fullStr | Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge |
title_full_unstemmed | Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge |
title_short | Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge |
title_sort | experience with a perfusion-only screening protocol for evaluation of pulmonary embolism during the covid-19 pandemic surge |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262580 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumararun experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge AT moadelreneem experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge AT haramatilindab experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge AT yekenny experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge AT freemanleonardm experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge AT zuckierlionels experiencewithaperfusiononlyscreeningprotocolforevaluationofpulmonaryembolismduringthecovid19pandemicsurge |