Cargando…

Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus on patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study is a systematic review of previously published patient selection for ambulatory LC. METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Google Sch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Weiwei, Wu, Qiang, Fu, Ning, Yang, Zhiming, Hao, Jingcheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313430
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_255_21
_version_ 1784680049305190400
author Chen, Weiwei
Wu, Qiang
Fu, Ning
Yang, Zhiming
Hao, Jingcheng
author_facet Chen, Weiwei
Wu, Qiang
Fu, Ning
Yang, Zhiming
Hao, Jingcheng
author_sort Chen, Weiwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus on patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study is a systematic review of previously published patient selection for ambulatory LC. METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Google Scholar Database up to March 2020 to summarise previously reported medical or surgical selection criteria used for inclusion and exclusion of patients, as well as successful same-day discharge rates and readmission rate after discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-nine studies with a total of 13,219 patients were included in this systematic review. In total, the median same-day discharge rate was 90% (range: 63%–99.4%), and median readmission rate was 2.22% (range: 0%–16.9%). The most considered medical criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I and II, age <70, and body mass index <35. Surgical criteria varied greatly. The top three accessible exclusion variables were (1) common bile duct stones, cholangitis, or jaundice (27 publications, 45.8%); (2) history of abdominal surgery (12 publications, 20.3%) and (3) history of pancreatitis (9 publications, 15.3%). CONCLUSION: The results of the current study showed the variable patient selection in different centres, the medical aspect criteria may be expanded under adequate pre-anaesthetic assessment and preparation and the surgical aspect criteria should include more laboratory or imaging parameters to ensure the surgical safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8973487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89734872022-04-02 Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review Chen, Weiwei Wu, Qiang Fu, Ning Yang, Zhiming Hao, Jingcheng J Minim Access Surg Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus on patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study is a systematic review of previously published patient selection for ambulatory LC. METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Google Scholar Database up to March 2020 to summarise previously reported medical or surgical selection criteria used for inclusion and exclusion of patients, as well as successful same-day discharge rates and readmission rate after discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-nine studies with a total of 13,219 patients were included in this systematic review. In total, the median same-day discharge rate was 90% (range: 63%–99.4%), and median readmission rate was 2.22% (range: 0%–16.9%). The most considered medical criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I and II, age <70, and body mass index <35. Surgical criteria varied greatly. The top three accessible exclusion variables were (1) common bile duct stones, cholangitis, or jaundice (27 publications, 45.8%); (2) history of abdominal surgery (12 publications, 20.3%) and (3) history of pancreatitis (9 publications, 15.3%). CONCLUSION: The results of the current study showed the variable patient selection in different centres, the medical aspect criteria may be expanded under adequate pre-anaesthetic assessment and preparation and the surgical aspect criteria should include more laboratory or imaging parameters to ensure the surgical safety. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8973487/ /pubmed/35313430 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_255_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Chen, Weiwei
Wu, Qiang
Fu, Ning
Yang, Zhiming
Hao, Jingcheng
Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review
title Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review
title_full Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review
title_fullStr Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review
title_short Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review
title_sort patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313430
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_255_21
work_keys_str_mv AT chenweiwei patientselectionforambulatorylaparoscopiccholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT wuqiang patientselectionforambulatorylaparoscopiccholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT funing patientselectionforambulatorylaparoscopiccholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT yangzhiming patientselectionforambulatorylaparoscopiccholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT haojingcheng patientselectionforambulatorylaparoscopiccholecystectomyasystematicreview