Cargando…
Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus on patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study is a systematic review of previously published patient selection for ambulatory LC. METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Google Sch...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313430 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_255_21 |
_version_ | 1784680049305190400 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Weiwei Wu, Qiang Fu, Ning Yang, Zhiming Hao, Jingcheng |
author_facet | Chen, Weiwei Wu, Qiang Fu, Ning Yang, Zhiming Hao, Jingcheng |
author_sort | Chen, Weiwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus on patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study is a systematic review of previously published patient selection for ambulatory LC. METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Google Scholar Database up to March 2020 to summarise previously reported medical or surgical selection criteria used for inclusion and exclusion of patients, as well as successful same-day discharge rates and readmission rate after discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-nine studies with a total of 13,219 patients were included in this systematic review. In total, the median same-day discharge rate was 90% (range: 63%–99.4%), and median readmission rate was 2.22% (range: 0%–16.9%). The most considered medical criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I and II, age <70, and body mass index <35. Surgical criteria varied greatly. The top three accessible exclusion variables were (1) common bile duct stones, cholangitis, or jaundice (27 publications, 45.8%); (2) history of abdominal surgery (12 publications, 20.3%) and (3) history of pancreatitis (9 publications, 15.3%). CONCLUSION: The results of the current study showed the variable patient selection in different centres, the medical aspect criteria may be expanded under adequate pre-anaesthetic assessment and preparation and the surgical aspect criteria should include more laboratory or imaging parameters to ensure the surgical safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8973487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89734872022-04-02 Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review Chen, Weiwei Wu, Qiang Fu, Ning Yang, Zhiming Hao, Jingcheng J Minim Access Surg Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus on patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study is a systematic review of previously published patient selection for ambulatory LC. METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Google Scholar Database up to March 2020 to summarise previously reported medical or surgical selection criteria used for inclusion and exclusion of patients, as well as successful same-day discharge rates and readmission rate after discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-nine studies with a total of 13,219 patients were included in this systematic review. In total, the median same-day discharge rate was 90% (range: 63%–99.4%), and median readmission rate was 2.22% (range: 0%–16.9%). The most considered medical criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I and II, age <70, and body mass index <35. Surgical criteria varied greatly. The top three accessible exclusion variables were (1) common bile duct stones, cholangitis, or jaundice (27 publications, 45.8%); (2) history of abdominal surgery (12 publications, 20.3%) and (3) history of pancreatitis (9 publications, 15.3%). CONCLUSION: The results of the current study showed the variable patient selection in different centres, the medical aspect criteria may be expanded under adequate pre-anaesthetic assessment and preparation and the surgical aspect criteria should include more laboratory or imaging parameters to ensure the surgical safety. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8973487/ /pubmed/35313430 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_255_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Chen, Weiwei Wu, Qiang Fu, Ning Yang, Zhiming Hao, Jingcheng Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review |
title | Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review |
title_full | Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review |
title_short | Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review |
title_sort | patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313430 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_255_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenweiwei patientselectionforambulatorylaparoscopiccholecystectomyasystematicreview AT wuqiang patientselectionforambulatorylaparoscopiccholecystectomyasystematicreview AT funing patientselectionforambulatorylaparoscopiccholecystectomyasystematicreview AT yangzhiming patientselectionforambulatorylaparoscopiccholecystectomyasystematicreview AT haojingcheng patientselectionforambulatorylaparoscopiccholecystectomyasystematicreview |