Cargando…

Surveillance of Enterobacter cloacae complex colonization and comparative analysis of different typing methods on a neonatal intensive care unit in Germany

BACKGROUND: Enterobacter cloacae complex is a group of common opportunistic pathogens on neonatal intensive care units. Active microbiological screening to guide empirical antimicrobial treatment or to detect transmission events is recommended in high-risk preterm neonates. A rise in colonization wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wendel, Andreas F., Peter, Daniel, Mattner, Frauke, Weiss, Michael, Hoppenz, Marc, Wolf, Sophia, Bader, Baris, Peter, Silke, Liese, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01094-y
_version_ 1784680063930728448
author Wendel, Andreas F.
Peter, Daniel
Mattner, Frauke
Weiss, Michael
Hoppenz, Marc
Wolf, Sophia
Bader, Baris
Peter, Silke
Liese, Jan
author_facet Wendel, Andreas F.
Peter, Daniel
Mattner, Frauke
Weiss, Michael
Hoppenz, Marc
Wolf, Sophia
Bader, Baris
Peter, Silke
Liese, Jan
author_sort Wendel, Andreas F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enterobacter cloacae complex is a group of common opportunistic pathogens on neonatal intensive care units. Active microbiological screening to guide empirical antimicrobial treatment or to detect transmission events is recommended in high-risk preterm neonates. A rise in colonization with E. cloacae complex was observed in a German perinatal centre. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of different typing techniques using whole genome sequencing (WGS) as a reference. METHODS: Enterobacter cloacae complex isolates from clinical and screening specimens with an epidemiological link to the neonatal intensive care units were further assessed. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by a combination of VITEK2 (bioMérieux) and MALDI-TOF (Bruker Daltonics), followed by RAPD/rep-PCR and PFGE (XbaI). Retrospectively, all isolates were analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (IR Biotyper, Bruker Daltonics). Whole genome sequencing with SNP-based clustering was used as the reference method. Furthermore, resistome analysis, sequence type and species identification were derived from the WGS data. Transmission analysis was based on epidemiological and typing data. RESULTS: Between September 2017 and March 2018 32 mostly preterm neonates were found to be colonized with E. cloacae complex and 32 isolates from 24 patients were available for further typing. RAPD/rep-PCR and PFGE showed good concordance with WGS whereas FTIR displayed mediocre results [adjusted rand index (ARI) = 0.436]. A polyclonal increase and two dominant and overlapping clonal clusters of two different E. hormaechei subspecies were detected. Overall, four different species were identified. Genotyping confirmed third-generation cephalosporin resistance development in isolates of the same patient. During the six-month period several infection prevention interventions were performed and no E. cloacae complex isolates were observed during the following months. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of the microbiological results alone to detect transmission events is often challenging and bacterial typing is of utmost importance to implement targeted infection control measures in an epidemic occurrence of E. cloacae complex. WGS is the most discriminatory method. However, traditional methods such as PFGE or RAPD/rep-PCR can provide reliable and quicker results in many settings. Furthermore, research is needed to quickly identify E. cloacae complex to the species level in the microbiological laboratory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8973561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89735612022-04-02 Surveillance of Enterobacter cloacae complex colonization and comparative analysis of different typing methods on a neonatal intensive care unit in Germany Wendel, Andreas F. Peter, Daniel Mattner, Frauke Weiss, Michael Hoppenz, Marc Wolf, Sophia Bader, Baris Peter, Silke Liese, Jan Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Enterobacter cloacae complex is a group of common opportunistic pathogens on neonatal intensive care units. Active microbiological screening to guide empirical antimicrobial treatment or to detect transmission events is recommended in high-risk preterm neonates. A rise in colonization with E. cloacae complex was observed in a German perinatal centre. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of different typing techniques using whole genome sequencing (WGS) as a reference. METHODS: Enterobacter cloacae complex isolates from clinical and screening specimens with an epidemiological link to the neonatal intensive care units were further assessed. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by a combination of VITEK2 (bioMérieux) and MALDI-TOF (Bruker Daltonics), followed by RAPD/rep-PCR and PFGE (XbaI). Retrospectively, all isolates were analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (IR Biotyper, Bruker Daltonics). Whole genome sequencing with SNP-based clustering was used as the reference method. Furthermore, resistome analysis, sequence type and species identification were derived from the WGS data. Transmission analysis was based on epidemiological and typing data. RESULTS: Between September 2017 and March 2018 32 mostly preterm neonates were found to be colonized with E. cloacae complex and 32 isolates from 24 patients were available for further typing. RAPD/rep-PCR and PFGE showed good concordance with WGS whereas FTIR displayed mediocre results [adjusted rand index (ARI) = 0.436]. A polyclonal increase and two dominant and overlapping clonal clusters of two different E. hormaechei subspecies were detected. Overall, four different species were identified. Genotyping confirmed third-generation cephalosporin resistance development in isolates of the same patient. During the six-month period several infection prevention interventions were performed and no E. cloacae complex isolates were observed during the following months. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of the microbiological results alone to detect transmission events is often challenging and bacterial typing is of utmost importance to implement targeted infection control measures in an epidemic occurrence of E. cloacae complex. WGS is the most discriminatory method. However, traditional methods such as PFGE or RAPD/rep-PCR can provide reliable and quicker results in many settings. Furthermore, research is needed to quickly identify E. cloacae complex to the species level in the microbiological laboratory. BioMed Central 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8973561/ /pubmed/35365217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01094-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wendel, Andreas F.
Peter, Daniel
Mattner, Frauke
Weiss, Michael
Hoppenz, Marc
Wolf, Sophia
Bader, Baris
Peter, Silke
Liese, Jan
Surveillance of Enterobacter cloacae complex colonization and comparative analysis of different typing methods on a neonatal intensive care unit in Germany
title Surveillance of Enterobacter cloacae complex colonization and comparative analysis of different typing methods on a neonatal intensive care unit in Germany
title_full Surveillance of Enterobacter cloacae complex colonization and comparative analysis of different typing methods on a neonatal intensive care unit in Germany
title_fullStr Surveillance of Enterobacter cloacae complex colonization and comparative analysis of different typing methods on a neonatal intensive care unit in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance of Enterobacter cloacae complex colonization and comparative analysis of different typing methods on a neonatal intensive care unit in Germany
title_short Surveillance of Enterobacter cloacae complex colonization and comparative analysis of different typing methods on a neonatal intensive care unit in Germany
title_sort surveillance of enterobacter cloacae complex colonization and comparative analysis of different typing methods on a neonatal intensive care unit in germany
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01094-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wendelandreasf surveillanceofenterobactercloacaecomplexcolonizationandcomparativeanalysisofdifferenttypingmethodsonaneonatalintensivecareunitingermany
AT peterdaniel surveillanceofenterobactercloacaecomplexcolonizationandcomparativeanalysisofdifferenttypingmethodsonaneonatalintensivecareunitingermany
AT mattnerfrauke surveillanceofenterobactercloacaecomplexcolonizationandcomparativeanalysisofdifferenttypingmethodsonaneonatalintensivecareunitingermany
AT weissmichael surveillanceofenterobactercloacaecomplexcolonizationandcomparativeanalysisofdifferenttypingmethodsonaneonatalintensivecareunitingermany
AT hoppenzmarc surveillanceofenterobactercloacaecomplexcolonizationandcomparativeanalysisofdifferenttypingmethodsonaneonatalintensivecareunitingermany
AT wolfsophia surveillanceofenterobactercloacaecomplexcolonizationandcomparativeanalysisofdifferenttypingmethodsonaneonatalintensivecareunitingermany
AT baderbaris surveillanceofenterobactercloacaecomplexcolonizationandcomparativeanalysisofdifferenttypingmethodsonaneonatalintensivecareunitingermany
AT petersilke surveillanceofenterobactercloacaecomplexcolonizationandcomparativeanalysisofdifferenttypingmethodsonaneonatalintensivecareunitingermany
AT liesejan surveillanceofenterobactercloacaecomplexcolonizationandcomparativeanalysisofdifferenttypingmethodsonaneonatalintensivecareunitingermany