Cargando…

Preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances are a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of this study was to investigate the preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances post-TAVR (hereafter CD/CDs). METHODS: Consecutive pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boonyakiatwattana, Wongsaput, Maneesai, Adisak, Chaithiraphan, Vithaya, Jakrapanichakul, Decho, Sakiyalak, Pranya, Chunhamaneewat, Narathip, Slisatkorn, Worawong, Chotinaiwattarakul, Chunhakasem, Pongakasira, Rungtiwa, Wongpraparut, Nattawut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8974214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02576-y
_version_ 1784680217375145984
author Boonyakiatwattana, Wongsaput
Maneesai, Adisak
Chaithiraphan, Vithaya
Jakrapanichakul, Decho
Sakiyalak, Pranya
Chunhamaneewat, Narathip
Slisatkorn, Worawong
Chotinaiwattarakul, Chunhakasem
Pongakasira, Rungtiwa
Wongpraparut, Nattawut
author_facet Boonyakiatwattana, Wongsaput
Maneesai, Adisak
Chaithiraphan, Vithaya
Jakrapanichakul, Decho
Sakiyalak, Pranya
Chunhamaneewat, Narathip
Slisatkorn, Worawong
Chotinaiwattarakul, Chunhakasem
Pongakasira, Rungtiwa
Wongpraparut, Nattawut
author_sort Boonyakiatwattana, Wongsaput
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances are a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of this study was to investigate the preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances post-TAVR (hereafter CD/CDs). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent TAVR during December 2009–March 2021 at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University—Thailand’s largest national tertiary referral center—were enrolled. Patients with prior implantation of a cardiac device, periprocedural death, or unsuccessful procedure were excluded. Clinical and electrocardiographic data, preprocedural imaging, including membranous septum (MS) length, and procedural variables, including implantation depth (ID), were analyzed. CD was defined as new left or right bundle branch block, significant intraventricular conduction disturbance with QRS interval ≥ 120 ms, new high-grade atrioventricular block, or complete heart block. Multivariate binary logistic analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to identify independent predictors and the optimal ∆MSID (difference between the MS length and ID) cutoff value, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 124 TAVR patients (mean age: 84.3 ± 6.3 years, 62.1% female) were included. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 7.3%, and 85% of patients received a balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve. Thirty-five patients (28.2%) experienced a CD, and one-third of those required pacemaker implantation. The significant preprocedural and procedural factors identified from univariate analysis included intraventricular conduction delay, mitral annular calcification, MS length ≤ 6.43 mm, self-expanding device, small left ventricular cavity, and ID ≥ 6 mm. Multivariate analysis revealed MS length ≤ 6.43 mm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.54; 95% CI 2.56–35.47; p = 0.001) and ∆MSID < 0 mm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 10.77; 95% CI 2.86–40.62; p =  < 0.001) to be independent predictors of CD. The optimal ∆MSID cutoff value for predicting conduction disturbances was less than 0 mm (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AuROC]: 0.896). CONCLUSION: This study identified MS length ≤ 6.43 mm and ∆MSID < 0 mm as independent predictors of CDs. ∆MSID < 0 was the strongest and only modifiable predictor. Importantly, we expanded the CD criteria to cover all spectrum of TAVR-related conduction injury to lower the threshold of this sole modifiable risk. The optimal ∆MSID cutoff value was < 0 mm. Trial registration: TCTR, TCTR20210818002. Registered 17 August 2021—Retrospectively registered, http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR 20210818002.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8974214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89742142022-04-02 Preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement Boonyakiatwattana, Wongsaput Maneesai, Adisak Chaithiraphan, Vithaya Jakrapanichakul, Decho Sakiyalak, Pranya Chunhamaneewat, Narathip Slisatkorn, Worawong Chotinaiwattarakul, Chunhakasem Pongakasira, Rungtiwa Wongpraparut, Nattawut BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances are a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of this study was to investigate the preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances post-TAVR (hereafter CD/CDs). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent TAVR during December 2009–March 2021 at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University—Thailand’s largest national tertiary referral center—were enrolled. Patients with prior implantation of a cardiac device, periprocedural death, or unsuccessful procedure were excluded. Clinical and electrocardiographic data, preprocedural imaging, including membranous septum (MS) length, and procedural variables, including implantation depth (ID), were analyzed. CD was defined as new left or right bundle branch block, significant intraventricular conduction disturbance with QRS interval ≥ 120 ms, new high-grade atrioventricular block, or complete heart block. Multivariate binary logistic analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to identify independent predictors and the optimal ∆MSID (difference between the MS length and ID) cutoff value, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 124 TAVR patients (mean age: 84.3 ± 6.3 years, 62.1% female) were included. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 7.3%, and 85% of patients received a balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve. Thirty-five patients (28.2%) experienced a CD, and one-third of those required pacemaker implantation. The significant preprocedural and procedural factors identified from univariate analysis included intraventricular conduction delay, mitral annular calcification, MS length ≤ 6.43 mm, self-expanding device, small left ventricular cavity, and ID ≥ 6 mm. Multivariate analysis revealed MS length ≤ 6.43 mm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.54; 95% CI 2.56–35.47; p = 0.001) and ∆MSID < 0 mm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 10.77; 95% CI 2.86–40.62; p =  < 0.001) to be independent predictors of CD. The optimal ∆MSID cutoff value for predicting conduction disturbances was less than 0 mm (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AuROC]: 0.896). CONCLUSION: This study identified MS length ≤ 6.43 mm and ∆MSID < 0 mm as independent predictors of CDs. ∆MSID < 0 was the strongest and only modifiable predictor. Importantly, we expanded the CD criteria to cover all spectrum of TAVR-related conduction injury to lower the threshold of this sole modifiable risk. The optimal ∆MSID cutoff value was < 0 mm. Trial registration: TCTR, TCTR20210818002. Registered 17 August 2021—Retrospectively registered, http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR 20210818002. BioMed Central 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8974214/ /pubmed/35361124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02576-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Boonyakiatwattana, Wongsaput
Maneesai, Adisak
Chaithiraphan, Vithaya
Jakrapanichakul, Decho
Sakiyalak, Pranya
Chunhamaneewat, Narathip
Slisatkorn, Worawong
Chotinaiwattarakul, Chunhakasem
Pongakasira, Rungtiwa
Wongpraparut, Nattawut
Preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title Preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_full Preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_fullStr Preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_full_unstemmed Preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_short Preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_sort preprocedural and procedural variables that predict new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8974214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02576-y
work_keys_str_mv AT boonyakiatwattanawongsaput preproceduralandproceduralvariablesthatpredictnewonsetconductiondisturbancesaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT maneesaiadisak preproceduralandproceduralvariablesthatpredictnewonsetconductiondisturbancesaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT chaithiraphanvithaya preproceduralandproceduralvariablesthatpredictnewonsetconductiondisturbancesaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT jakrapanichakuldecho preproceduralandproceduralvariablesthatpredictnewonsetconductiondisturbancesaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT sakiyalakpranya preproceduralandproceduralvariablesthatpredictnewonsetconductiondisturbancesaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT chunhamaneewatnarathip preproceduralandproceduralvariablesthatpredictnewonsetconductiondisturbancesaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT slisatkornworawong preproceduralandproceduralvariablesthatpredictnewonsetconductiondisturbancesaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT chotinaiwattarakulchunhakasem preproceduralandproceduralvariablesthatpredictnewonsetconductiondisturbancesaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT pongakasirarungtiwa preproceduralandproceduralvariablesthatpredictnewonsetconductiondisturbancesaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT wongpraparutnattawut preproceduralandproceduralvariablesthatpredictnewonsetconductiondisturbancesaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement