Cargando…

Clinical Validity of Plasma-Based Genotyping for Microsatellite Instability Assessment in Advanced GI Cancers: SCRUM-Japan GOZILA Substudy

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping may guide targeted therapy for patients with advanced GI cancers. However, no studies have validated ctDNA genotyping for microsatellite instability (MSI) assessment in comparison with a tissue-based standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The performance of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Yoshiaki, Okamoto, Wataru, Denda, Tadamichi, Nishina, Tomohiro, Komatsu, Yoshito, Yuki, Satoshi, Yasui, Hisateru, Esaki, Taito, Sunakawa, Yu, Ueno, Makoto, Shinozaki, Eiji, Matsuhashi, Nobuhisa, Ohta, Takashi, Kato, Ken, Ohtsubo, Koushiro, Bando, Hideaki, Hara, Hiroki, Satoh, Taroh, Yamazaki, Kentaro, Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki, Okano, Naohiro, Terazawa, Tetsuji, Kato, Takeshi, Oki, Eiji, Tsuji, Akihito, Horita, Yosuke, Hamamoto, Yasuo, Kawazoe, Akihito, Nakajima, Hiromichi, Nomura, Shogo, Mitani, Ryuta, Yuasa, Mihoko, Akagi, Kiwamu, Yoshino, Takayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8974570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35188805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.21.00383
_version_ 1784680242494832640
author Nakamura, Yoshiaki
Okamoto, Wataru
Denda, Tadamichi
Nishina, Tomohiro
Komatsu, Yoshito
Yuki, Satoshi
Yasui, Hisateru
Esaki, Taito
Sunakawa, Yu
Ueno, Makoto
Shinozaki, Eiji
Matsuhashi, Nobuhisa
Ohta, Takashi
Kato, Ken
Ohtsubo, Koushiro
Bando, Hideaki
Hara, Hiroki
Satoh, Taroh
Yamazaki, Kentaro
Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki
Okano, Naohiro
Terazawa, Tetsuji
Kato, Takeshi
Oki, Eiji
Tsuji, Akihito
Horita, Yosuke
Hamamoto, Yasuo
Kawazoe, Akihito
Nakajima, Hiromichi
Nomura, Shogo
Mitani, Ryuta
Yuasa, Mihoko
Akagi, Kiwamu
Yoshino, Takayuki
author_facet Nakamura, Yoshiaki
Okamoto, Wataru
Denda, Tadamichi
Nishina, Tomohiro
Komatsu, Yoshito
Yuki, Satoshi
Yasui, Hisateru
Esaki, Taito
Sunakawa, Yu
Ueno, Makoto
Shinozaki, Eiji
Matsuhashi, Nobuhisa
Ohta, Takashi
Kato, Ken
Ohtsubo, Koushiro
Bando, Hideaki
Hara, Hiroki
Satoh, Taroh
Yamazaki, Kentaro
Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki
Okano, Naohiro
Terazawa, Tetsuji
Kato, Takeshi
Oki, Eiji
Tsuji, Akihito
Horita, Yosuke
Hamamoto, Yasuo
Kawazoe, Akihito
Nakajima, Hiromichi
Nomura, Shogo
Mitani, Ryuta
Yuasa, Mihoko
Akagi, Kiwamu
Yoshino, Takayuki
author_sort Nakamura, Yoshiaki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping may guide targeted therapy for patients with advanced GI cancers. However, no studies have validated ctDNA genotyping for microsatellite instability (MSI) assessment in comparison with a tissue-based standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The performance of plasma-based MSI assessment using Guardant360, a next-generation sequencing–based ctDNA assay, was compared with that of tissue-based MSI assessment using a validated polymerase chain reaction–based method in patients with advanced GI cancers enrolled in GOZILA study, a nationwide ctDNA profiling study. The primary end points were overall percent agreement, positive percent agreement (PPA), and negative percent agreement. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy was also evaluated. RESULTS: In 658 patients with advanced GI cancers who underwent both plasma and tissue testing for MSI, the overall percent agreement, PPA, and negative percent agreement were 98.2% (95% CI, 96.8 to 99.1), 71.4% (95% CI, 47.8 to 88.7), and 99.1% (95% CI, 98.0 to 99.7), respectively. In patients whose plasma samples had a ctDNA fraction ≥ 1.0%, the PPA was 100.0% (15/15; 95% CI, 78.2 to 100.0). Three patients with MSI-high (MSI-H) tumors detected only by ctDNA genotyping achieved clinical benefits after receiving anti–programmed cell death 1 therapy with the progression-free survival ranging from 4.3 to 16.7 months. One patient with an aggressive cancer of an unknown primary site benefited from pembrolizumab after rapid detection of MSI-H by ctDNA genotyping. CONCLUSION: ctDNA genotyping was able to detect MSI with high concordance to validated tissue-based MSI testing, especially in patients with tumors that have sufficient ctDNA shedding. Furthermore, ctDNA genotyping enabled identification of patients with MSI-H tumors who benefited from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8974570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89745702022-04-04 Clinical Validity of Plasma-Based Genotyping for Microsatellite Instability Assessment in Advanced GI Cancers: SCRUM-Japan GOZILA Substudy Nakamura, Yoshiaki Okamoto, Wataru Denda, Tadamichi Nishina, Tomohiro Komatsu, Yoshito Yuki, Satoshi Yasui, Hisateru Esaki, Taito Sunakawa, Yu Ueno, Makoto Shinozaki, Eiji Matsuhashi, Nobuhisa Ohta, Takashi Kato, Ken Ohtsubo, Koushiro Bando, Hideaki Hara, Hiroki Satoh, Taroh Yamazaki, Kentaro Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki Okano, Naohiro Terazawa, Tetsuji Kato, Takeshi Oki, Eiji Tsuji, Akihito Horita, Yosuke Hamamoto, Yasuo Kawazoe, Akihito Nakajima, Hiromichi Nomura, Shogo Mitani, Ryuta Yuasa, Mihoko Akagi, Kiwamu Yoshino, Takayuki JCO Precis Oncol Original Reports PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping may guide targeted therapy for patients with advanced GI cancers. However, no studies have validated ctDNA genotyping for microsatellite instability (MSI) assessment in comparison with a tissue-based standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The performance of plasma-based MSI assessment using Guardant360, a next-generation sequencing–based ctDNA assay, was compared with that of tissue-based MSI assessment using a validated polymerase chain reaction–based method in patients with advanced GI cancers enrolled in GOZILA study, a nationwide ctDNA profiling study. The primary end points were overall percent agreement, positive percent agreement (PPA), and negative percent agreement. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy was also evaluated. RESULTS: In 658 patients with advanced GI cancers who underwent both plasma and tissue testing for MSI, the overall percent agreement, PPA, and negative percent agreement were 98.2% (95% CI, 96.8 to 99.1), 71.4% (95% CI, 47.8 to 88.7), and 99.1% (95% CI, 98.0 to 99.7), respectively. In patients whose plasma samples had a ctDNA fraction ≥ 1.0%, the PPA was 100.0% (15/15; 95% CI, 78.2 to 100.0). Three patients with MSI-high (MSI-H) tumors detected only by ctDNA genotyping achieved clinical benefits after receiving anti–programmed cell death 1 therapy with the progression-free survival ranging from 4.3 to 16.7 months. One patient with an aggressive cancer of an unknown primary site benefited from pembrolizumab after rapid detection of MSI-H by ctDNA genotyping. CONCLUSION: ctDNA genotyping was able to detect MSI with high concordance to validated tissue-based MSI testing, especially in patients with tumors that have sufficient ctDNA shedding. Furthermore, ctDNA genotyping enabled identification of patients with MSI-H tumors who benefited from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8974570/ /pubmed/35188805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.21.00383 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Reports
Nakamura, Yoshiaki
Okamoto, Wataru
Denda, Tadamichi
Nishina, Tomohiro
Komatsu, Yoshito
Yuki, Satoshi
Yasui, Hisateru
Esaki, Taito
Sunakawa, Yu
Ueno, Makoto
Shinozaki, Eiji
Matsuhashi, Nobuhisa
Ohta, Takashi
Kato, Ken
Ohtsubo, Koushiro
Bando, Hideaki
Hara, Hiroki
Satoh, Taroh
Yamazaki, Kentaro
Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki
Okano, Naohiro
Terazawa, Tetsuji
Kato, Takeshi
Oki, Eiji
Tsuji, Akihito
Horita, Yosuke
Hamamoto, Yasuo
Kawazoe, Akihito
Nakajima, Hiromichi
Nomura, Shogo
Mitani, Ryuta
Yuasa, Mihoko
Akagi, Kiwamu
Yoshino, Takayuki
Clinical Validity of Plasma-Based Genotyping for Microsatellite Instability Assessment in Advanced GI Cancers: SCRUM-Japan GOZILA Substudy
title Clinical Validity of Plasma-Based Genotyping for Microsatellite Instability Assessment in Advanced GI Cancers: SCRUM-Japan GOZILA Substudy
title_full Clinical Validity of Plasma-Based Genotyping for Microsatellite Instability Assessment in Advanced GI Cancers: SCRUM-Japan GOZILA Substudy
title_fullStr Clinical Validity of Plasma-Based Genotyping for Microsatellite Instability Assessment in Advanced GI Cancers: SCRUM-Japan GOZILA Substudy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Validity of Plasma-Based Genotyping for Microsatellite Instability Assessment in Advanced GI Cancers: SCRUM-Japan GOZILA Substudy
title_short Clinical Validity of Plasma-Based Genotyping for Microsatellite Instability Assessment in Advanced GI Cancers: SCRUM-Japan GOZILA Substudy
title_sort clinical validity of plasma-based genotyping for microsatellite instability assessment in advanced gi cancers: scrum-japan gozila substudy
topic Original Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8974570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35188805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.21.00383
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurayoshiaki clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT okamotowataru clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT dendatadamichi clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT nishinatomohiro clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT komatsuyoshito clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT yukisatoshi clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT yasuihisateru clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT esakitaito clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT sunakawayu clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT uenomakoto clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT shinozakieiji clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT matsuhashinobuhisa clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT ohtatakashi clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT katoken clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT ohtsubokoushiro clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT bandohideaki clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT harahiroki clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT satohtaroh clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT yamazakikentaro clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT yamamotoyoshiyuki clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT okanonaohiro clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT terazawatetsuji clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT katotakeshi clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT okieiji clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT tsujiakihito clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT horitayosuke clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT hamamotoyasuo clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT kawazoeakihito clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT nakajimahiromichi clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT nomurashogo clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT mitaniryuta clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT yuasamihoko clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT akagikiwamu clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy
AT yoshinotakayuki clinicalvalidityofplasmabasedgenotypingformicrosatelliteinstabilityassessmentinadvancedgicancersscrumjapangozilasubstudy