Cargando…

Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource

The Implementation of Infant Pain Practice (ImPaC) Resource is an eHealth tool designed to support infant pain practice change and ultimately enhance pain outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine users' perspectives on usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the ImPaC Resource. A d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bueno, Mariana, Stevens, Bonnie, Rao, Megha, Riahi, Shirine, Lanese, Alexa, Li, Shelly‐Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12027
_version_ 1784680359622868992
author Bueno, Mariana
Stevens, Bonnie
Rao, Megha
Riahi, Shirine
Lanese, Alexa
Li, Shelly‐Anne
author_facet Bueno, Mariana
Stevens, Bonnie
Rao, Megha
Riahi, Shirine
Lanese, Alexa
Li, Shelly‐Anne
author_sort Bueno, Mariana
collection PubMed
description The Implementation of Infant Pain Practice (ImPaC) Resource is an eHealth tool designed to support infant pain practice change and ultimately enhance pain outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine users' perspectives on usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the ImPaC Resource. A descriptive prospective mixed‐methods quality improvement study was conducted at a pediatric hospital in Canada. Individual “think aloud” interviews were conducted in a nonclinical environment (Phase A); “near live” testing was conducted while users interacted with the Resource in clinical setting (Phase B); individual “think‐aloud” interviews were conducted in a nonclinical environment (Phase C). Outcomes included usability (System Usability Scale—SUS), acceptability (Acceptability E‐Scale—AES), and feasibility. Interview transcripts were coded per a priori themes using deductive content analysis to create a structured categorization matrix. In Phase A, 10 clinicians interacted with the Resource in individual sessions. Median SUS score was 73.75 (range 52.5‐92.5). In Phase B, four clinicians implemented the Resource in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) over 4 months. Median SUS score was 85 (82.5‐92.5), and median AES score was 24 (21‐24). In Phase C, an enhanced prototype was produced, and the same users from Phase B navigated the Resource in individual sessions. Median SUS score was 88.75 (85‐95), and median AES score was 27.5 (25‐29). Users considered the Resource as feasible for implementation, easy to navigate, engaging, intuitive, comprehensive, and evidence‐based. Users highlighted the potential transferability of the Resource to other contexts and settings. The enhanced version of the ImPaC Resource was usable, acceptable, feasible, and met users' expectations and requirements. Results lead the way for evaluation of the Resource in a nationwide cluster randomized trial including 18 NICUs. This knowledge‐rich platform is expected to enhance infant pain practices and outcomes in diverse clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8975234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89752342022-05-10 Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource Bueno, Mariana Stevens, Bonnie Rao, Megha Riahi, Shirine Lanese, Alexa Li, Shelly‐Anne Paediatr Neonatal Pain Original Articles The Implementation of Infant Pain Practice (ImPaC) Resource is an eHealth tool designed to support infant pain practice change and ultimately enhance pain outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine users' perspectives on usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the ImPaC Resource. A descriptive prospective mixed‐methods quality improvement study was conducted at a pediatric hospital in Canada. Individual “think aloud” interviews were conducted in a nonclinical environment (Phase A); “near live” testing was conducted while users interacted with the Resource in clinical setting (Phase B); individual “think‐aloud” interviews were conducted in a nonclinical environment (Phase C). Outcomes included usability (System Usability Scale—SUS), acceptability (Acceptability E‐Scale—AES), and feasibility. Interview transcripts were coded per a priori themes using deductive content analysis to create a structured categorization matrix. In Phase A, 10 clinicians interacted with the Resource in individual sessions. Median SUS score was 73.75 (range 52.5‐92.5). In Phase B, four clinicians implemented the Resource in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) over 4 months. Median SUS score was 85 (82.5‐92.5), and median AES score was 24 (21‐24). In Phase C, an enhanced prototype was produced, and the same users from Phase B navigated the Resource in individual sessions. Median SUS score was 88.75 (85‐95), and median AES score was 27.5 (25‐29). Users considered the Resource as feasible for implementation, easy to navigate, engaging, intuitive, comprehensive, and evidence‐based. Users highlighted the potential transferability of the Resource to other contexts and settings. The enhanced version of the ImPaC Resource was usable, acceptable, feasible, and met users' expectations and requirements. Results lead the way for evaluation of the Resource in a nationwide cluster randomized trial including 18 NICUs. This knowledge‐rich platform is expected to enhance infant pain practices and outcomes in diverse clinical settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8975234/ /pubmed/35547024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12027 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Paediatric and Neonatal Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bueno, Mariana
Stevens, Bonnie
Rao, Megha
Riahi, Shirine
Lanese, Alexa
Li, Shelly‐Anne
Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource
title Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource
title_full Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource
title_fullStr Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource
title_full_unstemmed Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource
title_short Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource
title_sort usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the implementation of infant pain practice change (impac) resource
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12027
work_keys_str_mv AT buenomariana usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource
AT stevensbonnie usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource
AT raomegha usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource
AT riahishirine usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource
AT lanesealexa usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource
AT lishellyanne usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource
AT usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource