Cargando…
Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource
The Implementation of Infant Pain Practice (ImPaC) Resource is an eHealth tool designed to support infant pain practice change and ultimately enhance pain outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine users' perspectives on usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the ImPaC Resource. A d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12027 |
_version_ | 1784680359622868992 |
---|---|
author | Bueno, Mariana Stevens, Bonnie Rao, Megha Riahi, Shirine Lanese, Alexa Li, Shelly‐Anne |
author_facet | Bueno, Mariana Stevens, Bonnie Rao, Megha Riahi, Shirine Lanese, Alexa Li, Shelly‐Anne |
author_sort | Bueno, Mariana |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Implementation of Infant Pain Practice (ImPaC) Resource is an eHealth tool designed to support infant pain practice change and ultimately enhance pain outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine users' perspectives on usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the ImPaC Resource. A descriptive prospective mixed‐methods quality improvement study was conducted at a pediatric hospital in Canada. Individual “think aloud” interviews were conducted in a nonclinical environment (Phase A); “near live” testing was conducted while users interacted with the Resource in clinical setting (Phase B); individual “think‐aloud” interviews were conducted in a nonclinical environment (Phase C). Outcomes included usability (System Usability Scale—SUS), acceptability (Acceptability E‐Scale—AES), and feasibility. Interview transcripts were coded per a priori themes using deductive content analysis to create a structured categorization matrix. In Phase A, 10 clinicians interacted with the Resource in individual sessions. Median SUS score was 73.75 (range 52.5‐92.5). In Phase B, four clinicians implemented the Resource in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) over 4 months. Median SUS score was 85 (82.5‐92.5), and median AES score was 24 (21‐24). In Phase C, an enhanced prototype was produced, and the same users from Phase B navigated the Resource in individual sessions. Median SUS score was 88.75 (85‐95), and median AES score was 27.5 (25‐29). Users considered the Resource as feasible for implementation, easy to navigate, engaging, intuitive, comprehensive, and evidence‐based. Users highlighted the potential transferability of the Resource to other contexts and settings. The enhanced version of the ImPaC Resource was usable, acceptable, feasible, and met users' expectations and requirements. Results lead the way for evaluation of the Resource in a nationwide cluster randomized trial including 18 NICUs. This knowledge‐rich platform is expected to enhance infant pain practices and outcomes in diverse clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8975234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89752342022-05-10 Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource Bueno, Mariana Stevens, Bonnie Rao, Megha Riahi, Shirine Lanese, Alexa Li, Shelly‐Anne Paediatr Neonatal Pain Original Articles The Implementation of Infant Pain Practice (ImPaC) Resource is an eHealth tool designed to support infant pain practice change and ultimately enhance pain outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine users' perspectives on usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the ImPaC Resource. A descriptive prospective mixed‐methods quality improvement study was conducted at a pediatric hospital in Canada. Individual “think aloud” interviews were conducted in a nonclinical environment (Phase A); “near live” testing was conducted while users interacted with the Resource in clinical setting (Phase B); individual “think‐aloud” interviews were conducted in a nonclinical environment (Phase C). Outcomes included usability (System Usability Scale—SUS), acceptability (Acceptability E‐Scale—AES), and feasibility. Interview transcripts were coded per a priori themes using deductive content analysis to create a structured categorization matrix. In Phase A, 10 clinicians interacted with the Resource in individual sessions. Median SUS score was 73.75 (range 52.5‐92.5). In Phase B, four clinicians implemented the Resource in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) over 4 months. Median SUS score was 85 (82.5‐92.5), and median AES score was 24 (21‐24). In Phase C, an enhanced prototype was produced, and the same users from Phase B navigated the Resource in individual sessions. Median SUS score was 88.75 (85‐95), and median AES score was 27.5 (25‐29). Users considered the Resource as feasible for implementation, easy to navigate, engaging, intuitive, comprehensive, and evidence‐based. Users highlighted the potential transferability of the Resource to other contexts and settings. The enhanced version of the ImPaC Resource was usable, acceptable, feasible, and met users' expectations and requirements. Results lead the way for evaluation of the Resource in a nationwide cluster randomized trial including 18 NICUs. This knowledge‐rich platform is expected to enhance infant pain practices and outcomes in diverse clinical settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8975234/ /pubmed/35547024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12027 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Paediatric and Neonatal Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Bueno, Mariana Stevens, Bonnie Rao, Megha Riahi, Shirine Lanese, Alexa Li, Shelly‐Anne Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource |
title | Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource |
title_full | Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource |
title_fullStr | Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource |
title_full_unstemmed | Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource |
title_short | Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (ImPaC) Resource |
title_sort | usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the implementation of infant pain practice change (impac) resource |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buenomariana usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource AT stevensbonnie usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource AT raomegha usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource AT riahishirine usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource AT lanesealexa usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource AT lishellyanne usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource AT usabilityacceptabilityandfeasibilityoftheimplementationofinfantpainpracticechangeimpacresource |