Cargando…

Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers

BACKGROUND: To compare the frequency parameters of voice between children using cochlear implant (CI) and those with normal hearing and establishing a trend of development of voice characteristics across chronological and implant ages. METHODS: The study included 87 children aged 12 to 72 months, wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Umashankar, Abishek, Dhandayutham, Subhashini, Ramamoorthy, Santhoshi, Lydia Selvaraj, Jasmine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34617888
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2021.9171
_version_ 1784680376800641024
author Umashankar, Abishek
Dhandayutham, Subhashini
Ramamoorthy, Santhoshi
Lydia Selvaraj, Jasmine
author_facet Umashankar, Abishek
Dhandayutham, Subhashini
Ramamoorthy, Santhoshi
Lydia Selvaraj, Jasmine
author_sort Umashankar, Abishek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the frequency parameters of voice between children using cochlear implant (CI) and those with normal hearing and establishing a trend of development of voice characteristics across chronological and implant ages. METHODS: The study included 87 children aged 12 to 72 months, with a mean age of 41 months. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included 44 children using CIs, and group 2 included 43 children with normal hearing and age-appropriate speech and language characteristics. Both groups were categorized into 3 subgroups based on their chronological ages, group A (12-32 months), B (33-52 months), and C (53-72 months). The CI group (i.e., group 2) was further subdivided based on implant ages as group D (1-4 months), E (5-8 months), and F (9-12 months). RESULTS: Comparison of vocal frequency parameters across chronological ages revealed a decline with increasing age in both groups; however, stability was not maintained in the CI group. There was a statistically significant difference in the vocal frequency parameters between normal hearing children and those with CI. Comparing across implant ages, there was a significant difference between groups D and F. CONCLUSION: For better communication abilities of individuals with CI, along with early implantation and rehabilitation, there is a need to also focus therapy on providing training on speech modulations, especially on voice characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8975418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89754182022-04-14 Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers Umashankar, Abishek Dhandayutham, Subhashini Ramamoorthy, Santhoshi Lydia Selvaraj, Jasmine J Int Adv Otol Original Article BACKGROUND: To compare the frequency parameters of voice between children using cochlear implant (CI) and those with normal hearing and establishing a trend of development of voice characteristics across chronological and implant ages. METHODS: The study included 87 children aged 12 to 72 months, with a mean age of 41 months. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included 44 children using CIs, and group 2 included 43 children with normal hearing and age-appropriate speech and language characteristics. Both groups were categorized into 3 subgroups based on their chronological ages, group A (12-32 months), B (33-52 months), and C (53-72 months). The CI group (i.e., group 2) was further subdivided based on implant ages as group D (1-4 months), E (5-8 months), and F (9-12 months). RESULTS: Comparison of vocal frequency parameters across chronological ages revealed a decline with increasing age in both groups; however, stability was not maintained in the CI group. There was a statistically significant difference in the vocal frequency parameters between normal hearing children and those with CI. Comparing across implant ages, there was a significant difference between groups D and F. CONCLUSION: For better communication abilities of individuals with CI, along with early implantation and rehabilitation, there is a need to also focus therapy on providing training on speech modulations, especially on voice characteristics. European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8975418/ /pubmed/34617888 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2021.9171 Text en 2021 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Umashankar, Abishek
Dhandayutham, Subhashini
Ramamoorthy, Santhoshi
Lydia Selvaraj, Jasmine
Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers
title Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers
title_full Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers
title_fullStr Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers
title_full_unstemmed Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers
title_short Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers
title_sort frequency characteristics in children using cochlear implant: a comparison with normal hearing peers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34617888
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2021.9171
work_keys_str_mv AT umashankarabishek frequencycharacteristicsinchildrenusingcochlearimplantacomparisonwithnormalhearingpeers
AT dhandayuthamsubhashini frequencycharacteristicsinchildrenusingcochlearimplantacomparisonwithnormalhearingpeers
AT ramamoorthysanthoshi frequencycharacteristicsinchildrenusingcochlearimplantacomparisonwithnormalhearingpeers
AT lydiaselvarajjasmine frequencycharacteristicsinchildrenusingcochlearimplantacomparisonwithnormalhearingpeers