Cargando…
Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers
BACKGROUND: To compare the frequency parameters of voice between children using cochlear implant (CI) and those with normal hearing and establishing a trend of development of voice characteristics across chronological and implant ages. METHODS: The study included 87 children aged 12 to 72 months, wi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34617888 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2021.9171 |
_version_ | 1784680376800641024 |
---|---|
author | Umashankar, Abishek Dhandayutham, Subhashini Ramamoorthy, Santhoshi Lydia Selvaraj, Jasmine |
author_facet | Umashankar, Abishek Dhandayutham, Subhashini Ramamoorthy, Santhoshi Lydia Selvaraj, Jasmine |
author_sort | Umashankar, Abishek |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the frequency parameters of voice between children using cochlear implant (CI) and those with normal hearing and establishing a trend of development of voice characteristics across chronological and implant ages. METHODS: The study included 87 children aged 12 to 72 months, with a mean age of 41 months. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included 44 children using CIs, and group 2 included 43 children with normal hearing and age-appropriate speech and language characteristics. Both groups were categorized into 3 subgroups based on their chronological ages, group A (12-32 months), B (33-52 months), and C (53-72 months). The CI group (i.e., group 2) was further subdivided based on implant ages as group D (1-4 months), E (5-8 months), and F (9-12 months). RESULTS: Comparison of vocal frequency parameters across chronological ages revealed a decline with increasing age in both groups; however, stability was not maintained in the CI group. There was a statistically significant difference in the vocal frequency parameters between normal hearing children and those with CI. Comparing across implant ages, there was a significant difference between groups D and F. CONCLUSION: For better communication abilities of individuals with CI, along with early implantation and rehabilitation, there is a need to also focus therapy on providing training on speech modulations, especially on voice characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8975418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89754182022-04-14 Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers Umashankar, Abishek Dhandayutham, Subhashini Ramamoorthy, Santhoshi Lydia Selvaraj, Jasmine J Int Adv Otol Original Article BACKGROUND: To compare the frequency parameters of voice between children using cochlear implant (CI) and those with normal hearing and establishing a trend of development of voice characteristics across chronological and implant ages. METHODS: The study included 87 children aged 12 to 72 months, with a mean age of 41 months. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included 44 children using CIs, and group 2 included 43 children with normal hearing and age-appropriate speech and language characteristics. Both groups were categorized into 3 subgroups based on their chronological ages, group A (12-32 months), B (33-52 months), and C (53-72 months). The CI group (i.e., group 2) was further subdivided based on implant ages as group D (1-4 months), E (5-8 months), and F (9-12 months). RESULTS: Comparison of vocal frequency parameters across chronological ages revealed a decline with increasing age in both groups; however, stability was not maintained in the CI group. There was a statistically significant difference in the vocal frequency parameters between normal hearing children and those with CI. Comparing across implant ages, there was a significant difference between groups D and F. CONCLUSION: For better communication abilities of individuals with CI, along with early implantation and rehabilitation, there is a need to also focus therapy on providing training on speech modulations, especially on voice characteristics. European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8975418/ /pubmed/34617888 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2021.9171 Text en 2021 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Umashankar, Abishek Dhandayutham, Subhashini Ramamoorthy, Santhoshi Lydia Selvaraj, Jasmine Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers |
title | Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers |
title_full | Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers |
title_fullStr | Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers |
title_full_unstemmed | Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers |
title_short | Frequency Characteristics in Children Using Cochlear Implant: A Comparison With Normal Hearing Peers |
title_sort | frequency characteristics in children using cochlear implant: a comparison with normal hearing peers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34617888 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2021.9171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT umashankarabishek frequencycharacteristicsinchildrenusingcochlearimplantacomparisonwithnormalhearingpeers AT dhandayuthamsubhashini frequencycharacteristicsinchildrenusingcochlearimplantacomparisonwithnormalhearingpeers AT ramamoorthysanthoshi frequencycharacteristicsinchildrenusingcochlearimplantacomparisonwithnormalhearingpeers AT lydiaselvarajjasmine frequencycharacteristicsinchildrenusingcochlearimplantacomparisonwithnormalhearingpeers |