Cargando…

Optimising outcomes for complex trauma survivors: assessing the motivators, barriers and enablers for implementing trauma informed practice within a multidisciplinary health setting

BACKGROUND: Complex trauma is a significant public health issue with detrimental health, interpersonal and psychological impacts, which can impede client recovery and result in multiple representations. ‘Trauma Informed Practice’ (TIP) is an evidence-based model which ensures safe and effective serv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lovell, Renee C., Greenfield, David, Johnson, George, Eljiz, Kathy, Amanatidis, Sue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07812-x
_version_ 1784680429312278528
author Lovell, Renee C.
Greenfield, David
Johnson, George
Eljiz, Kathy
Amanatidis, Sue
author_facet Lovell, Renee C.
Greenfield, David
Johnson, George
Eljiz, Kathy
Amanatidis, Sue
author_sort Lovell, Renee C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complex trauma is a significant public health issue with detrimental health, interpersonal and psychological impacts, which can impede client recovery and result in multiple representations. ‘Trauma Informed Practice’ (TIP) is an evidence-based model which ensures safe and effective services for clients and staff. This study examines health professional’s use of TIP, and the motivators, enablers and barriers to implementation in a multidisciplinary setting. METHODS: A mixed methods study with 24 front-line clinicians and managers within a community health setting in Australia. A purpose designed, expert validated TIP checklist was completed, followed by semi-structured focus groups. Survey data was reported using descriptive statistics. Focus group data was digitally recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Ten key factors were identified motivating, restricting or enabling TIP implementation. Seven were organisational factors including supportive and informed management, flexibility of service models, levels of service demands, resource availability, education opportunities, good client outcomes, and reporting requirements. Philosophical approach, team orientation, and vicarious trauma/stress management were three individual professional factors. Critically, alignment in two ways was necessary for successful implementation, that is: in knowledge and understanding across organisational role levels - clinician, manager and executive; and, in professional philosophy and team orientation of individual clinicians. CONCLUSION: Providing TIP is essential for ensuring optimum client outcomes for trauma survivors and for maintaining workforce wellbeing. Although the increasing uptake to TIP is evident within the health setting, further attention is required to address the tension between service models focused on efficiently servicing whole populations and those attuned to effectively meeting the needs of high risk groups. A complex strategy to unite therapeutic and managerial goals is necessary if client, professional and organisational needs are to be effectively met.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8975732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89757322022-04-03 Optimising outcomes for complex trauma survivors: assessing the motivators, barriers and enablers for implementing trauma informed practice within a multidisciplinary health setting Lovell, Renee C. Greenfield, David Johnson, George Eljiz, Kathy Amanatidis, Sue BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Complex trauma is a significant public health issue with detrimental health, interpersonal and psychological impacts, which can impede client recovery and result in multiple representations. ‘Trauma Informed Practice’ (TIP) is an evidence-based model which ensures safe and effective services for clients and staff. This study examines health professional’s use of TIP, and the motivators, enablers and barriers to implementation in a multidisciplinary setting. METHODS: A mixed methods study with 24 front-line clinicians and managers within a community health setting in Australia. A purpose designed, expert validated TIP checklist was completed, followed by semi-structured focus groups. Survey data was reported using descriptive statistics. Focus group data was digitally recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Ten key factors were identified motivating, restricting or enabling TIP implementation. Seven were organisational factors including supportive and informed management, flexibility of service models, levels of service demands, resource availability, education opportunities, good client outcomes, and reporting requirements. Philosophical approach, team orientation, and vicarious trauma/stress management were three individual professional factors. Critically, alignment in two ways was necessary for successful implementation, that is: in knowledge and understanding across organisational role levels - clinician, manager and executive; and, in professional philosophy and team orientation of individual clinicians. CONCLUSION: Providing TIP is essential for ensuring optimum client outcomes for trauma survivors and for maintaining workforce wellbeing. Although the increasing uptake to TIP is evident within the health setting, further attention is required to address the tension between service models focused on efficiently servicing whole populations and those attuned to effectively meeting the needs of high risk groups. A complex strategy to unite therapeutic and managerial goals is necessary if client, professional and organisational needs are to be effectively met. BioMed Central 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8975732/ /pubmed/35366859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07812-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lovell, Renee C.
Greenfield, David
Johnson, George
Eljiz, Kathy
Amanatidis, Sue
Optimising outcomes for complex trauma survivors: assessing the motivators, barriers and enablers for implementing trauma informed practice within a multidisciplinary health setting
title Optimising outcomes for complex trauma survivors: assessing the motivators, barriers and enablers for implementing trauma informed practice within a multidisciplinary health setting
title_full Optimising outcomes for complex trauma survivors: assessing the motivators, barriers and enablers for implementing trauma informed practice within a multidisciplinary health setting
title_fullStr Optimising outcomes for complex trauma survivors: assessing the motivators, barriers and enablers for implementing trauma informed practice within a multidisciplinary health setting
title_full_unstemmed Optimising outcomes for complex trauma survivors: assessing the motivators, barriers and enablers for implementing trauma informed practice within a multidisciplinary health setting
title_short Optimising outcomes for complex trauma survivors: assessing the motivators, barriers and enablers for implementing trauma informed practice within a multidisciplinary health setting
title_sort optimising outcomes for complex trauma survivors: assessing the motivators, barriers and enablers for implementing trauma informed practice within a multidisciplinary health setting
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07812-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lovellreneec optimisingoutcomesforcomplextraumasurvivorsassessingthemotivatorsbarriersandenablersforimplementingtraumainformedpracticewithinamultidisciplinaryhealthsetting
AT greenfielddavid optimisingoutcomesforcomplextraumasurvivorsassessingthemotivatorsbarriersandenablersforimplementingtraumainformedpracticewithinamultidisciplinaryhealthsetting
AT johnsongeorge optimisingoutcomesforcomplextraumasurvivorsassessingthemotivatorsbarriersandenablersforimplementingtraumainformedpracticewithinamultidisciplinaryhealthsetting
AT eljizkathy optimisingoutcomesforcomplextraumasurvivorsassessingthemotivatorsbarriersandenablersforimplementingtraumainformedpracticewithinamultidisciplinaryhealthsetting
AT amanatidissue optimisingoutcomesforcomplextraumasurvivorsassessingthemotivatorsbarriersandenablersforimplementingtraumainformedpracticewithinamultidisciplinaryhealthsetting