Cargando…

Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation

Visuomotor adaptation arises when reaching in an altered visual environment, where one’s seen hand position does not match their felt (i.e., proprioceptive) hand position in space. Here, we asked if proprioceptive training benefits visuomotor adaptation, and if these benefits arise due to implicit (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Decarie, Amelia, Cressman, Erin K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06352-4
_version_ 1784680429570228224
author Decarie, Amelia
Cressman, Erin K.
author_facet Decarie, Amelia
Cressman, Erin K.
author_sort Decarie, Amelia
collection PubMed
description Visuomotor adaptation arises when reaching in an altered visual environment, where one’s seen hand position does not match their felt (i.e., proprioceptive) hand position in space. Here, we asked if proprioceptive training benefits visuomotor adaptation, and if these benefits arise due to implicit (unconscious) or explicit (conscious strategy) processes. Seventy-two participants were divided equally into 3 groups: proprioceptive training with feedback (PTWF), proprioceptive training no feedback (PTNF), and Control (CTRL). The PTWF and PTNF groups completed passive proprioceptive training, where a participant’s hand was moved to an unknown reference location and they judged the felt position of their unseen hand relative to their body midline on every trial. The PTWF group received verbal feedback with respect to their response accuracy on the middle 60% of trials, whereas the PTNF did not receive any feedback during training. The CTRL group did not complete proprioceptive training and instead sat quietly during this time. Following proprioceptive training or time delay, all three groups reached when seeing a cursor that was rotated 30° clockwise relative to their hand motion. The experiment ended with participants completing a series of no-cursor reaches to assess implicit and explicit adaptation. Results indicated that the PTWF group improved the accuracy of their sense of felt hand position following proprioceptive training. However, this improved proprioceptive acuity (i.e., the accuracy of their sense of felt hand) did not benefit visuomotor adaptation, as all three groups showed similar visuomotor adaptation across rotated reach training trials. Visuomotor adaptation arose implicitly, with minimal explicit contribution for all three groups. Together, these results suggest that passive proprioceptive training does not benefit, nor hinder, the extent of implicit visuomotor adaptation established immediately following reach training with a 30° cursor rotation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00221-022-06352-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8975733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89757332022-04-04 Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation Decarie, Amelia Cressman, Erin K. Exp Brain Res Research Article Visuomotor adaptation arises when reaching in an altered visual environment, where one’s seen hand position does not match their felt (i.e., proprioceptive) hand position in space. Here, we asked if proprioceptive training benefits visuomotor adaptation, and if these benefits arise due to implicit (unconscious) or explicit (conscious strategy) processes. Seventy-two participants were divided equally into 3 groups: proprioceptive training with feedback (PTWF), proprioceptive training no feedback (PTNF), and Control (CTRL). The PTWF and PTNF groups completed passive proprioceptive training, where a participant’s hand was moved to an unknown reference location and they judged the felt position of their unseen hand relative to their body midline on every trial. The PTWF group received verbal feedback with respect to their response accuracy on the middle 60% of trials, whereas the PTNF did not receive any feedback during training. The CTRL group did not complete proprioceptive training and instead sat quietly during this time. Following proprioceptive training or time delay, all three groups reached when seeing a cursor that was rotated 30° clockwise relative to their hand motion. The experiment ended with participants completing a series of no-cursor reaches to assess implicit and explicit adaptation. Results indicated that the PTWF group improved the accuracy of their sense of felt hand position following proprioceptive training. However, this improved proprioceptive acuity (i.e., the accuracy of their sense of felt hand) did not benefit visuomotor adaptation, as all three groups showed similar visuomotor adaptation across rotated reach training trials. Visuomotor adaptation arose implicitly, with minimal explicit contribution for all three groups. Together, these results suggest that passive proprioceptive training does not benefit, nor hinder, the extent of implicit visuomotor adaptation established immediately following reach training with a 30° cursor rotation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00221-022-06352-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8975733/ /pubmed/35366069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06352-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research Article
Decarie, Amelia
Cressman, Erin K.
Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation
title Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation
title_full Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation
title_fullStr Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation
title_short Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation
title_sort improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06352-4
work_keys_str_mv AT decarieamelia improvedproprioceptiondoesnotbenefitvisuomotoradaptation
AT cressmanerink improvedproprioceptiondoesnotbenefitvisuomotoradaptation