Cargando…
Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation
Visuomotor adaptation arises when reaching in an altered visual environment, where one’s seen hand position does not match their felt (i.e., proprioceptive) hand position in space. Here, we asked if proprioceptive training benefits visuomotor adaptation, and if these benefits arise due to implicit (...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06352-4 |
_version_ | 1784680429570228224 |
---|---|
author | Decarie, Amelia Cressman, Erin K. |
author_facet | Decarie, Amelia Cressman, Erin K. |
author_sort | Decarie, Amelia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Visuomotor adaptation arises when reaching in an altered visual environment, where one’s seen hand position does not match their felt (i.e., proprioceptive) hand position in space. Here, we asked if proprioceptive training benefits visuomotor adaptation, and if these benefits arise due to implicit (unconscious) or explicit (conscious strategy) processes. Seventy-two participants were divided equally into 3 groups: proprioceptive training with feedback (PTWF), proprioceptive training no feedback (PTNF), and Control (CTRL). The PTWF and PTNF groups completed passive proprioceptive training, where a participant’s hand was moved to an unknown reference location and they judged the felt position of their unseen hand relative to their body midline on every trial. The PTWF group received verbal feedback with respect to their response accuracy on the middle 60% of trials, whereas the PTNF did not receive any feedback during training. The CTRL group did not complete proprioceptive training and instead sat quietly during this time. Following proprioceptive training or time delay, all three groups reached when seeing a cursor that was rotated 30° clockwise relative to their hand motion. The experiment ended with participants completing a series of no-cursor reaches to assess implicit and explicit adaptation. Results indicated that the PTWF group improved the accuracy of their sense of felt hand position following proprioceptive training. However, this improved proprioceptive acuity (i.e., the accuracy of their sense of felt hand) did not benefit visuomotor adaptation, as all three groups showed similar visuomotor adaptation across rotated reach training trials. Visuomotor adaptation arose implicitly, with minimal explicit contribution for all three groups. Together, these results suggest that passive proprioceptive training does not benefit, nor hinder, the extent of implicit visuomotor adaptation established immediately following reach training with a 30° cursor rotation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00221-022-06352-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8975733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89757332022-04-04 Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation Decarie, Amelia Cressman, Erin K. Exp Brain Res Research Article Visuomotor adaptation arises when reaching in an altered visual environment, where one’s seen hand position does not match their felt (i.e., proprioceptive) hand position in space. Here, we asked if proprioceptive training benefits visuomotor adaptation, and if these benefits arise due to implicit (unconscious) or explicit (conscious strategy) processes. Seventy-two participants were divided equally into 3 groups: proprioceptive training with feedback (PTWF), proprioceptive training no feedback (PTNF), and Control (CTRL). The PTWF and PTNF groups completed passive proprioceptive training, where a participant’s hand was moved to an unknown reference location and they judged the felt position of their unseen hand relative to their body midline on every trial. The PTWF group received verbal feedback with respect to their response accuracy on the middle 60% of trials, whereas the PTNF did not receive any feedback during training. The CTRL group did not complete proprioceptive training and instead sat quietly during this time. Following proprioceptive training or time delay, all three groups reached when seeing a cursor that was rotated 30° clockwise relative to their hand motion. The experiment ended with participants completing a series of no-cursor reaches to assess implicit and explicit adaptation. Results indicated that the PTWF group improved the accuracy of their sense of felt hand position following proprioceptive training. However, this improved proprioceptive acuity (i.e., the accuracy of their sense of felt hand) did not benefit visuomotor adaptation, as all three groups showed similar visuomotor adaptation across rotated reach training trials. Visuomotor adaptation arose implicitly, with minimal explicit contribution for all three groups. Together, these results suggest that passive proprioceptive training does not benefit, nor hinder, the extent of implicit visuomotor adaptation established immediately following reach training with a 30° cursor rotation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00221-022-06352-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8975733/ /pubmed/35366069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06352-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Decarie, Amelia Cressman, Erin K. Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation |
title | Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation |
title_full | Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation |
title_fullStr | Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation |
title_full_unstemmed | Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation |
title_short | Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation |
title_sort | improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06352-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decarieamelia improvedproprioceptiondoesnotbenefitvisuomotoradaptation AT cressmanerink improvedproprioceptiondoesnotbenefitvisuomotoradaptation |