Cargando…

Classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss

Blood and fluid analysis is extensively used for classifying the etiology of pleural effusion. However, most studies focused on determining the presence of a disease. This study classified pleural effusion etiology employing deep learning models by applying contrastive-loss. Patients with pleural ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jang Ho, Choi, Chang-Min, Park, Namu, Park, Hyung Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09550-w
_version_ 1784680450006974464
author Lee, Jang Ho
Choi, Chang-Min
Park, Namu
Park, Hyung Jun
author_facet Lee, Jang Ho
Choi, Chang-Min
Park, Namu
Park, Hyung Jun
author_sort Lee, Jang Ho
collection PubMed
description Blood and fluid analysis is extensively used for classifying the etiology of pleural effusion. However, most studies focused on determining the presence of a disease. This study classified pleural effusion etiology employing deep learning models by applying contrastive-loss. Patients with pleural effusion who underwent thoracentesis between 2009 and 2019 at the Asan Medical Center were analyzed. Five different models for categorizing the etiology of pleural effusion were compared. The performance metrics were top-1 accuracy, top-2 accuracy, and micro-and weighted-AUROC. UMAP and t-SNE were used to visualize the contrastive-loss model’s embedding space. Although the 5 models displayed similar performance in the validation set, the contrastive-loss model showed the highest accuracy in the extra-validation set. Additionally, the accuracy and micro-AUROC of the contrastive-loss model were 81.7% and 0.942 in the validation set, and 66.2% and 0.867 in the extra-validation set. Furthermore, the embedding space visualization in the contrastive-loss model exhibited typical and atypical effusion results by comparing the true and false positives of the rule-based criteria. Therefore, classifying the etiology of pleural effusion was achievable using the contrastive-loss model. Conclusively, visualization of the contrastive-loss model will provide clinicians with valuable insights for etiology diagnosis by differentiating between typical and atypical disease types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8975824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89758242022-04-05 Classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss Lee, Jang Ho Choi, Chang-Min Park, Namu Park, Hyung Jun Sci Rep Article Blood and fluid analysis is extensively used for classifying the etiology of pleural effusion. However, most studies focused on determining the presence of a disease. This study classified pleural effusion etiology employing deep learning models by applying contrastive-loss. Patients with pleural effusion who underwent thoracentesis between 2009 and 2019 at the Asan Medical Center were analyzed. Five different models for categorizing the etiology of pleural effusion were compared. The performance metrics were top-1 accuracy, top-2 accuracy, and micro-and weighted-AUROC. UMAP and t-SNE were used to visualize the contrastive-loss model’s embedding space. Although the 5 models displayed similar performance in the validation set, the contrastive-loss model showed the highest accuracy in the extra-validation set. Additionally, the accuracy and micro-AUROC of the contrastive-loss model were 81.7% and 0.942 in the validation set, and 66.2% and 0.867 in the extra-validation set. Furthermore, the embedding space visualization in the contrastive-loss model exhibited typical and atypical effusion results by comparing the true and false positives of the rule-based criteria. Therefore, classifying the etiology of pleural effusion was achievable using the contrastive-loss model. Conclusively, visualization of the contrastive-loss model will provide clinicians with valuable insights for etiology diagnosis by differentiating between typical and atypical disease types. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8975824/ /pubmed/35365722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09550-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Jang Ho
Choi, Chang-Min
Park, Namu
Park, Hyung Jun
Classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss
title Classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss
title_full Classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss
title_fullStr Classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss
title_full_unstemmed Classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss
title_short Classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss
title_sort classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09550-w
work_keys_str_mv AT leejangho classificationofpleuraleffusionsusingdeeplearningvisualmodelscontrastiveloss
AT choichangmin classificationofpleuraleffusionsusingdeeplearningvisualmodelscontrastiveloss
AT parknamu classificationofpleuraleffusionsusingdeeplearningvisualmodelscontrastiveloss
AT parkhyungjun classificationofpleuraleffusionsusingdeeplearningvisualmodelscontrastiveloss