Cargando…
The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect
Micronucleus (MN) formation is routinely used as a biodosimeter for radiation exposures and has historically been used as a measure of DNA damage in cells. Strongly correlating with dose, MN are also suggested to indicate radiation quality, differentiating between particle and photon irradiation. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac001 |
_version_ | 1784680521061629952 |
---|---|
author | Heaven, Charlotte J Wanstall, Hannah C Henthorn, Nicholas T Warmenhoven, John-William Ingram, Samuel P Chadwick, Amy L Santina, Elham Honeychurch, Jamie Schmidt, Christine K Kirkby, Karen J Kirkby, Norman F Burnet, Neil G Merchant, Michael J |
author_facet | Heaven, Charlotte J Wanstall, Hannah C Henthorn, Nicholas T Warmenhoven, John-William Ingram, Samuel P Chadwick, Amy L Santina, Elham Honeychurch, Jamie Schmidt, Christine K Kirkby, Karen J Kirkby, Norman F Burnet, Neil G Merchant, Michael J |
author_sort | Heaven, Charlotte J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Micronucleus (MN) formation is routinely used as a biodosimeter for radiation exposures and has historically been used as a measure of DNA damage in cells. Strongly correlating with dose, MN are also suggested to indicate radiation quality, differentiating between particle and photon irradiation. The “gold standard” for measuring MN formation is Fenech’s cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) cytome assay, which uses the cytokinesis blocking agent cytochalasin-B. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the literature investigating MN induction trends in vitro, collating 193 publications, with 2476 data points. Data were collected from original studies that used the CBMN assay to quantify MN in response to ionizing radiation in vitro. Overall, the meta-analysis showed that individual studies mostly have a linear increase of MN with dose [85% of MN per cell (MNPC) datasets and 89% of percentage containing MN (PCMN) datasets had an R(2) greater than 0.90]. However, there is high variation between studies, resulting in a low R(2) when data are combined (0.47 for MNPC datasets and 0.60 for PCMN datasets). Particle type, species, cell type, and cytochalasin-B concentration were suggested to influence MN frequency. However, variation in the data meant that the effects could not be strongly correlated with the experimental parameters investigated. There is less variation between studies when comparing the PCMN rather than the number of MNPC. Deviation from CBMN protocol specified timings did not have a large effect on MN induction. However, further analysis showed less variation between studies following Fenech’s protocol closely, which provided more reliable results. By limiting the cell type and species as well as only selecting studies following the Fenech protocol, R(2) was increased to 0.64 for both measures. We therefore determine that due to variation between studies, MN are currently a poor predictor of radiation-induced DNA damage and make recommendations for futures studies assessing MN to improve consistency between datasets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8976228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89762282022-04-04 The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect Heaven, Charlotte J Wanstall, Hannah C Henthorn, Nicholas T Warmenhoven, John-William Ingram, Samuel P Chadwick, Amy L Santina, Elham Honeychurch, Jamie Schmidt, Christine K Kirkby, Karen J Kirkby, Norman F Burnet, Neil G Merchant, Michael J Mutagenesis Original Manuscripts Micronucleus (MN) formation is routinely used as a biodosimeter for radiation exposures and has historically been used as a measure of DNA damage in cells. Strongly correlating with dose, MN are also suggested to indicate radiation quality, differentiating between particle and photon irradiation. The “gold standard” for measuring MN formation is Fenech’s cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) cytome assay, which uses the cytokinesis blocking agent cytochalasin-B. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the literature investigating MN induction trends in vitro, collating 193 publications, with 2476 data points. Data were collected from original studies that used the CBMN assay to quantify MN in response to ionizing radiation in vitro. Overall, the meta-analysis showed that individual studies mostly have a linear increase of MN with dose [85% of MN per cell (MNPC) datasets and 89% of percentage containing MN (PCMN) datasets had an R(2) greater than 0.90]. However, there is high variation between studies, resulting in a low R(2) when data are combined (0.47 for MNPC datasets and 0.60 for PCMN datasets). Particle type, species, cell type, and cytochalasin-B concentration were suggested to influence MN frequency. However, variation in the data meant that the effects could not be strongly correlated with the experimental parameters investigated. There is less variation between studies when comparing the PCMN rather than the number of MNPC. Deviation from CBMN protocol specified timings did not have a large effect on MN induction. However, further analysis showed less variation between studies following Fenech’s protocol closely, which provided more reliable results. By limiting the cell type and species as well as only selecting studies following the Fenech protocol, R(2) was increased to 0.64 for both measures. We therefore determine that due to variation between studies, MN are currently a poor predictor of radiation-induced DNA damage and make recommendations for futures studies assessing MN to improve consistency between datasets. Oxford University Press 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8976228/ /pubmed/35137176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac001 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscripts Heaven, Charlotte J Wanstall, Hannah C Henthorn, Nicholas T Warmenhoven, John-William Ingram, Samuel P Chadwick, Amy L Santina, Elham Honeychurch, Jamie Schmidt, Christine K Kirkby, Karen J Kirkby, Norman F Burnet, Neil G Merchant, Michael J The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect |
title | The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect |
title_full | The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect |
title_fullStr | The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect |
title_full_unstemmed | The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect |
title_short | The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect |
title_sort | suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect |
topic | Original Manuscripts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heavencharlottej thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT wanstallhannahc thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT henthornnicholast thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT warmenhovenjohnwilliam thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT ingramsamuelp thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT chadwickamyl thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT santinaelham thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT honeychurchjamie thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT schmidtchristinek thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT kirkbykarenj thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT kirkbynormanf thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT burnetneilg thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT merchantmichaelj thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT heavencharlottej suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT wanstallhannahc suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT henthornnicholast suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT warmenhovenjohnwilliam suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT ingramsamuelp suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT chadwickamyl suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT santinaelham suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT honeychurchjamie suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT schmidtchristinek suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT kirkbykarenj suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT kirkbynormanf suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT burnetneilg suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect AT merchantmichaelj suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect |