Cargando…

The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect

Micronucleus (MN) formation is routinely used as a biodosimeter for radiation exposures and has historically been used as a measure of DNA damage in cells. Strongly correlating with dose, MN are also suggested to indicate radiation quality, differentiating between particle and photon irradiation. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heaven, Charlotte J, Wanstall, Hannah C, Henthorn, Nicholas T, Warmenhoven, John-William, Ingram, Samuel P, Chadwick, Amy L, Santina, Elham, Honeychurch, Jamie, Schmidt, Christine K, Kirkby, Karen J, Kirkby, Norman F, Burnet, Neil G, Merchant, Michael J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac001
_version_ 1784680521061629952
author Heaven, Charlotte J
Wanstall, Hannah C
Henthorn, Nicholas T
Warmenhoven, John-William
Ingram, Samuel P
Chadwick, Amy L
Santina, Elham
Honeychurch, Jamie
Schmidt, Christine K
Kirkby, Karen J
Kirkby, Norman F
Burnet, Neil G
Merchant, Michael J
author_facet Heaven, Charlotte J
Wanstall, Hannah C
Henthorn, Nicholas T
Warmenhoven, John-William
Ingram, Samuel P
Chadwick, Amy L
Santina, Elham
Honeychurch, Jamie
Schmidt, Christine K
Kirkby, Karen J
Kirkby, Norman F
Burnet, Neil G
Merchant, Michael J
author_sort Heaven, Charlotte J
collection PubMed
description Micronucleus (MN) formation is routinely used as a biodosimeter for radiation exposures and has historically been used as a measure of DNA damage in cells. Strongly correlating with dose, MN are also suggested to indicate radiation quality, differentiating between particle and photon irradiation. The “gold standard” for measuring MN formation is Fenech’s cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) cytome assay, which uses the cytokinesis blocking agent cytochalasin-B. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the literature investigating MN induction trends in vitro, collating 193 publications, with 2476 data points. Data were collected from original studies that used the CBMN assay to quantify MN in response to ionizing radiation in vitro. Overall, the meta-analysis showed that individual studies mostly have a linear increase of MN with dose [85% of MN per cell (MNPC) datasets and 89% of percentage containing MN (PCMN) datasets had an R(2) greater than 0.90]. However, there is high variation between studies, resulting in a low R(2) when data are combined (0.47 for MNPC datasets and 0.60 for PCMN datasets). Particle type, species, cell type, and cytochalasin-B concentration were suggested to influence MN frequency. However, variation in the data meant that the effects could not be strongly correlated with the experimental parameters investigated. There is less variation between studies when comparing the PCMN rather than the number of MNPC. Deviation from CBMN protocol specified timings did not have a large effect on MN induction. However, further analysis showed less variation between studies following Fenech’s protocol closely, which provided more reliable results. By limiting the cell type and species as well as only selecting studies following the Fenech protocol, R(2) was increased to 0.64 for both measures. We therefore determine that due to variation between studies, MN are currently a poor predictor of radiation-induced DNA damage and make recommendations for futures studies assessing MN to improve consistency between datasets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8976228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89762282022-04-04 The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect Heaven, Charlotte J Wanstall, Hannah C Henthorn, Nicholas T Warmenhoven, John-William Ingram, Samuel P Chadwick, Amy L Santina, Elham Honeychurch, Jamie Schmidt, Christine K Kirkby, Karen J Kirkby, Norman F Burnet, Neil G Merchant, Michael J Mutagenesis Original Manuscripts Micronucleus (MN) formation is routinely used as a biodosimeter for radiation exposures and has historically been used as a measure of DNA damage in cells. Strongly correlating with dose, MN are also suggested to indicate radiation quality, differentiating between particle and photon irradiation. The “gold standard” for measuring MN formation is Fenech’s cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) cytome assay, which uses the cytokinesis blocking agent cytochalasin-B. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the literature investigating MN induction trends in vitro, collating 193 publications, with 2476 data points. Data were collected from original studies that used the CBMN assay to quantify MN in response to ionizing radiation in vitro. Overall, the meta-analysis showed that individual studies mostly have a linear increase of MN with dose [85% of MN per cell (MNPC) datasets and 89% of percentage containing MN (PCMN) datasets had an R(2) greater than 0.90]. However, there is high variation between studies, resulting in a low R(2) when data are combined (0.47 for MNPC datasets and 0.60 for PCMN datasets). Particle type, species, cell type, and cytochalasin-B concentration were suggested to influence MN frequency. However, variation in the data meant that the effects could not be strongly correlated with the experimental parameters investigated. There is less variation between studies when comparing the PCMN rather than the number of MNPC. Deviation from CBMN protocol specified timings did not have a large effect on MN induction. However, further analysis showed less variation between studies following Fenech’s protocol closely, which provided more reliable results. By limiting the cell type and species as well as only selecting studies following the Fenech protocol, R(2) was increased to 0.64 for both measures. We therefore determine that due to variation between studies, MN are currently a poor predictor of radiation-induced DNA damage and make recommendations for futures studies assessing MN to improve consistency between datasets. Oxford University Press 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8976228/ /pubmed/35137176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac001 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Manuscripts
Heaven, Charlotte J
Wanstall, Hannah C
Henthorn, Nicholas T
Warmenhoven, John-William
Ingram, Samuel P
Chadwick, Amy L
Santina, Elham
Honeychurch, Jamie
Schmidt, Christine K
Kirkby, Karen J
Kirkby, Norman F
Burnet, Neil G
Merchant, Michael J
The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect
title The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect
title_full The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect
title_fullStr The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect
title_full_unstemmed The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect
title_short The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect
title_sort suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect
topic Original Manuscripts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac001
work_keys_str_mv AT heavencharlottej thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT wanstallhannahc thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT henthornnicholast thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT warmenhovenjohnwilliam thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT ingramsamuelp thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT chadwickamyl thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT santinaelham thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT honeychurchjamie thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT schmidtchristinek thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT kirkbykarenj thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT kirkbynormanf thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT burnetneilg thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT merchantmichaelj thesuitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT heavencharlottej suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT wanstallhannahc suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT henthornnicholast suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT warmenhovenjohnwilliam suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT ingramsamuelp suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT chadwickamyl suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT santinaelham suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT honeychurchjamie suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT schmidtchristinek suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT kirkbykarenj suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT kirkbynormanf suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT burnetneilg suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect
AT merchantmichaelj suitabilityofmicronucleiasmarkersofrelativebiologicaleffect