Cargando…
A “cluster” of ten uterine anomalies observed in a single center over a short period of 4 weeks: a case series
BACKGROUND: Uterine anomalies occur because of Müllerian duct maldevelopment. Few of them are associated with adverse obstetric outcome (Reyes-Muñoz et al. in Diagnostics. 2019;9:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9040149). Genital outflow tract obstructive uterine anomalies invariably present in...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03362-2 |
_version_ | 1784680544027541504 |
---|---|
author | Kabadi, Yogindrakumar M. Ayyanar, Abirami |
author_facet | Kabadi, Yogindrakumar M. Ayyanar, Abirami |
author_sort | Kabadi, Yogindrakumar M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uterine anomalies occur because of Müllerian duct maldevelopment. Few of them are associated with adverse obstetric outcome (Reyes-Muñoz et al. in Diagnostics. 2019;9:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9040149). Genital outflow tract obstructive uterine anomalies invariably present in the adolescent age group. CASE DETAILS: We report a case series of uterine anomalies. Ten such cases presented like a “cluster” within a short span of just one month. Eight of these ten cases were diagnosed intraoperatively during cesarean section. One case was diagnosed during laparoscopic sterilization, and the other case was diagnosed before doing manual vacuum aspiration. There were four cases of bicornuate uterus, two cases each of unicornuate uterus and uterine didelphys, and one case each of septate uterus and arcuate uterus. All eight babies were healthy and without any obvious congenital anomalies. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, literature regarding these anomalies has been mentioned mostly as case reports (Bruand et al. in Cureus. 2020;12:3. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7191) and a few case series (Ross et al. in BMJ Case Rep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-221815). All women were of Kannadiga ethnicity and in the age range of 19–35 years. They were from places nearby to our institute within a range of approximately 250 km. CONCLUSION: We describe herein almost all types of uterine anomalies. These rare uterine anomalies presented in a short span of just four weeks like a “cluster”. This incidental finding is unusual. We need to design studies to understand the reasons for clustering of such cases in our clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8976329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89763292022-04-03 A “cluster” of ten uterine anomalies observed in a single center over a short period of 4 weeks: a case series Kabadi, Yogindrakumar M. Ayyanar, Abirami J Med Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: Uterine anomalies occur because of Müllerian duct maldevelopment. Few of them are associated with adverse obstetric outcome (Reyes-Muñoz et al. in Diagnostics. 2019;9:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9040149). Genital outflow tract obstructive uterine anomalies invariably present in the adolescent age group. CASE DETAILS: We report a case series of uterine anomalies. Ten such cases presented like a “cluster” within a short span of just one month. Eight of these ten cases were diagnosed intraoperatively during cesarean section. One case was diagnosed during laparoscopic sterilization, and the other case was diagnosed before doing manual vacuum aspiration. There were four cases of bicornuate uterus, two cases each of unicornuate uterus and uterine didelphys, and one case each of septate uterus and arcuate uterus. All eight babies were healthy and without any obvious congenital anomalies. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, literature regarding these anomalies has been mentioned mostly as case reports (Bruand et al. in Cureus. 2020;12:3. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7191) and a few case series (Ross et al. in BMJ Case Rep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-221815). All women were of Kannadiga ethnicity and in the age range of 19–35 years. They were from places nearby to our institute within a range of approximately 250 km. CONCLUSION: We describe herein almost all types of uterine anomalies. These rare uterine anomalies presented in a short span of just four weeks like a “cluster”. This incidental finding is unusual. We need to design studies to understand the reasons for clustering of such cases in our clinical practice. BioMed Central 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8976329/ /pubmed/35365244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03362-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Kabadi, Yogindrakumar M. Ayyanar, Abirami A “cluster” of ten uterine anomalies observed in a single center over a short period of 4 weeks: a case series |
title | A “cluster” of ten uterine anomalies observed in a single center over a short period of 4 weeks: a case series |
title_full | A “cluster” of ten uterine anomalies observed in a single center over a short period of 4 weeks: a case series |
title_fullStr | A “cluster” of ten uterine anomalies observed in a single center over a short period of 4 weeks: a case series |
title_full_unstemmed | A “cluster” of ten uterine anomalies observed in a single center over a short period of 4 weeks: a case series |
title_short | A “cluster” of ten uterine anomalies observed in a single center over a short period of 4 weeks: a case series |
title_sort | “cluster” of ten uterine anomalies observed in a single center over a short period of 4 weeks: a case series |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03362-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kabadiyogindrakumarm aclusteroftenuterineanomaliesobservedinasinglecenteroverashortperiodof4weeksacaseseries AT ayyanarabirami aclusteroftenuterineanomaliesobservedinasinglecenteroverashortperiodof4weeksacaseseries AT kabadiyogindrakumarm clusteroftenuterineanomaliesobservedinasinglecenteroverashortperiodof4weeksacaseseries AT ayyanarabirami clusteroftenuterineanomaliesobservedinasinglecenteroverashortperiodof4weeksacaseseries |