Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Falls are a common and serious public health issue among older adults, contributing to the loss of independence, psychological distress, and incapability to engage in meaningful occupations, etc. However, there is a lack of abundant information about the fall risk self-evaluation scale f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhizhuo, Rong, Yuetong, Gu, Li, Yang, Yanyan, Du, Xinmin, Zhou, Mouwang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-02962-3
_version_ 1784680546537832448
author Wang, Zhizhuo
Rong, Yuetong
Gu, Li
Yang, Yanyan
Du, Xinmin
Zhou, Mouwang
author_facet Wang, Zhizhuo
Rong, Yuetong
Gu, Li
Yang, Yanyan
Du, Xinmin
Zhou, Mouwang
author_sort Wang, Zhizhuo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Falls are a common and serious public health issue among older adults, contributing to the loss of independence, psychological distress, and incapability to engage in meaningful occupations, etc. However, there is a lack of abundant information about the fall risk self-evaluation scale for community-dwelling older people. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the preliminary reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale (FRSAS) among community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 230 individuals aged 65 years and over were recruited by a convenience sampling between October and December 2020 from three communities in Haidian district, Beijing. Eligible participants were required to fill in the general condition questionnaire and the fall risk self-assessment scale. The reliability and validity were analyzed by using SPSS 20.0. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two participants completed the assessment as required (the completion rate was 96.52%). The most items of FRSAS were understood by older adults, which was completed in 10 min. Cronbach’s α and intraclass correlation coefficient ICC (2,1) of the scale were 0.757 and 0.967 respectively, suggesting good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Exploratory factor analysis yielded 14 factors that explained 61.744% of the variance. Five items failed to be categorized into any factors because the factor loading of these items was less than 0.4. A future large-sample study needs to be conducted to explore its construct validity. The total scores and dimensional scores except for C-dimension showed significant differences between participants who had experienced a fall in the previous 6 months and those who had not (P < 0.05), indicating good discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: The fall risk self-assessment scale including 41 items demonstrated relatively high feasibility as well as satisfactory results in the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and discriminant validity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR2000038856; Date of registration: 7 Oct 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-02962-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8976342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89763422022-04-03 Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study Wang, Zhizhuo Rong, Yuetong Gu, Li Yang, Yanyan Du, Xinmin Zhou, Mouwang BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Falls are a common and serious public health issue among older adults, contributing to the loss of independence, psychological distress, and incapability to engage in meaningful occupations, etc. However, there is a lack of abundant information about the fall risk self-evaluation scale for community-dwelling older people. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the preliminary reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale (FRSAS) among community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 230 individuals aged 65 years and over were recruited by a convenience sampling between October and December 2020 from three communities in Haidian district, Beijing. Eligible participants were required to fill in the general condition questionnaire and the fall risk self-assessment scale. The reliability and validity were analyzed by using SPSS 20.0. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two participants completed the assessment as required (the completion rate was 96.52%). The most items of FRSAS were understood by older adults, which was completed in 10 min. Cronbach’s α and intraclass correlation coefficient ICC (2,1) of the scale were 0.757 and 0.967 respectively, suggesting good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Exploratory factor analysis yielded 14 factors that explained 61.744% of the variance. Five items failed to be categorized into any factors because the factor loading of these items was less than 0.4. A future large-sample study needs to be conducted to explore its construct validity. The total scores and dimensional scores except for C-dimension showed significant differences between participants who had experienced a fall in the previous 6 months and those who had not (P < 0.05), indicating good discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: The fall risk self-assessment scale including 41 items demonstrated relatively high feasibility as well as satisfactory results in the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and discriminant validity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR2000038856; Date of registration: 7 Oct 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-02962-3. BioMed Central 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8976342/ /pubmed/35365082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-02962-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Zhizhuo
Rong, Yuetong
Gu, Li
Yang, Yanyan
Du, Xinmin
Zhou, Mouwang
Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study
title Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study
title_full Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study
title_short Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study
title_sort reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in china: a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-02962-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhizhuo reliabilityandvalidityofthefallriskselfassessmentscaleforcommunitydwellingolderpeopleinchinaapilotstudy
AT rongyuetong reliabilityandvalidityofthefallriskselfassessmentscaleforcommunitydwellingolderpeopleinchinaapilotstudy
AT guli reliabilityandvalidityofthefallriskselfassessmentscaleforcommunitydwellingolderpeopleinchinaapilotstudy
AT yangyanyan reliabilityandvalidityofthefallriskselfassessmentscaleforcommunitydwellingolderpeopleinchinaapilotstudy
AT duxinmin reliabilityandvalidityofthefallriskselfassessmentscaleforcommunitydwellingolderpeopleinchinaapilotstudy
AT zhoumouwang reliabilityandvalidityofthefallriskselfassessmentscaleforcommunitydwellingolderpeopleinchinaapilotstudy