Cargando…

Comparison and development of a metagenomic next-generation sequencing protocol for combined detection of DNA and RNA pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate different pretreatment, extraction, amplification, and library generation methods for metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and to develop an efficient procedure for the simultaneous detection of DNA and RNA p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Hanfang, Xing, Zhihao, Liu, Xiaorong, Chai, Qiang, Xin, Zefeng, Zhu, Chunqing, Lin, Ruihong, Deng, Xuwen, Cui, Dong, Gao, HongDan, Ma, Dongli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07272-y
_version_ 1784680550115573760
author Jiang, Hanfang
Xing, Zhihao
Liu, Xiaorong
Chai, Qiang
Xin, Zefeng
Zhu, Chunqing
Lin, Ruihong
Deng, Xuwen
Cui, Dong
Gao, HongDan
Ma, Dongli
author_facet Jiang, Hanfang
Xing, Zhihao
Liu, Xiaorong
Chai, Qiang
Xin, Zefeng
Zhu, Chunqing
Lin, Ruihong
Deng, Xuwen
Cui, Dong
Gao, HongDan
Ma, Dongli
author_sort Jiang, Hanfang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate different pretreatment, extraction, amplification, and library generation methods for metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and to develop an efficient procedure for the simultaneous detection of DNA and RNA pathogens. METHODS: We generated thirteen mock CSF samples with four representative pathogens of encephalitis. Each sample was subjected to ten different methods by varying sample pretreatment/nucleic acid extraction (microbial DNA, total DNA, total NA, total RNA, Whole Transcriptome Amplification (WTA)) and library generation (Illumina or NEB). Negative extraction controls (NECs) were used for each method variation. RESULTS: We found that the quality of mNGS sequencing reads was higher from the NEB kit for library generation. Microbial DNA and total RNA increased microbial deposition by depleting the host DNA. Methods total NA and total RNA can detect gram-positive, gram-negative, RNA and DNA pathogens. We applied mNGS, including total NA and NEB library generation, to CSF samples from five patients diagnosed with infectious encephalitis and correctly determined all pathogens identified in clinical etiological tests. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that total nucleic acid extraction combined with NEB library generation is the most effective mNGS procedure in CSF pathogen detection. The optimization of positive criteria and databases can improve the specificity and sensitivity of mNGS diagnosis. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800015425 (29/03/2018), https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=26292&htm=4. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07272-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8976360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89763602022-04-03 Comparison and development of a metagenomic next-generation sequencing protocol for combined detection of DNA and RNA pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid Jiang, Hanfang Xing, Zhihao Liu, Xiaorong Chai, Qiang Xin, Zefeng Zhu, Chunqing Lin, Ruihong Deng, Xuwen Cui, Dong Gao, HongDan Ma, Dongli BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate different pretreatment, extraction, amplification, and library generation methods for metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and to develop an efficient procedure for the simultaneous detection of DNA and RNA pathogens. METHODS: We generated thirteen mock CSF samples with four representative pathogens of encephalitis. Each sample was subjected to ten different methods by varying sample pretreatment/nucleic acid extraction (microbial DNA, total DNA, total NA, total RNA, Whole Transcriptome Amplification (WTA)) and library generation (Illumina or NEB). Negative extraction controls (NECs) were used for each method variation. RESULTS: We found that the quality of mNGS sequencing reads was higher from the NEB kit for library generation. Microbial DNA and total RNA increased microbial deposition by depleting the host DNA. Methods total NA and total RNA can detect gram-positive, gram-negative, RNA and DNA pathogens. We applied mNGS, including total NA and NEB library generation, to CSF samples from five patients diagnosed with infectious encephalitis and correctly determined all pathogens identified in clinical etiological tests. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that total nucleic acid extraction combined with NEB library generation is the most effective mNGS procedure in CSF pathogen detection. The optimization of positive criteria and databases can improve the specificity and sensitivity of mNGS diagnosis. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800015425 (29/03/2018), https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=26292&htm=4. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07272-y. BioMed Central 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8976360/ /pubmed/35365081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07272-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jiang, Hanfang
Xing, Zhihao
Liu, Xiaorong
Chai, Qiang
Xin, Zefeng
Zhu, Chunqing
Lin, Ruihong
Deng, Xuwen
Cui, Dong
Gao, HongDan
Ma, Dongli
Comparison and development of a metagenomic next-generation sequencing protocol for combined detection of DNA and RNA pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid
title Comparison and development of a metagenomic next-generation sequencing protocol for combined detection of DNA and RNA pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid
title_full Comparison and development of a metagenomic next-generation sequencing protocol for combined detection of DNA and RNA pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid
title_fullStr Comparison and development of a metagenomic next-generation sequencing protocol for combined detection of DNA and RNA pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and development of a metagenomic next-generation sequencing protocol for combined detection of DNA and RNA pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid
title_short Comparison and development of a metagenomic next-generation sequencing protocol for combined detection of DNA and RNA pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid
title_sort comparison and development of a metagenomic next-generation sequencing protocol for combined detection of dna and rna pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07272-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jianghanfang comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid
AT xingzhihao comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid
AT liuxiaorong comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid
AT chaiqiang comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid
AT xinzefeng comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid
AT zhuchunqing comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid
AT linruihong comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid
AT dengxuwen comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid
AT cuidong comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid
AT gaohongdan comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid
AT madongli comparisonanddevelopmentofametagenomicnextgenerationsequencingprotocolforcombineddetectionofdnaandrnapathogensincerebrospinalfluid