Cargando…

Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) in revision hip arthroplasty provides direct access to the femoral medullary canal and facilitates removal of implants and re-implantation. This study looks at objective outcomes of ETO from a systematic review of the literature and a case series of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamad, Khalid, Konan, Sujith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00115-w
_version_ 1784680677008998400
author Hamad, Khalid
Konan, Sujith
author_facet Hamad, Khalid
Konan, Sujith
author_sort Hamad, Khalid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) in revision hip arthroplasty provides direct access to the femoral medullary canal and facilitates removal of implants and re-implantation. This study looks at objective outcomes of ETO from a systematic review of the literature and a case series of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases with ETOs from the authors’ local institution. METHODS: (1) The National Institutes of Health (NIH) national library of medicine was searched for studies related to ETO and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) technique were followed. (2) Case series of 23 revision THAs with ETOs from University College London Hospital (UCLH) were retrospectively analyzed with a minimum of 2-year follow-up for radiological outcomes. RESULTS: (1) The main revision THAs diagnoses were aseptic loosening (880/1,386; 63.4%), prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (301/1,386; 21.7%) and periprosthetic THA fractures (78/1,386; 5.6%). Other diagnoses, including non-specified reasons for THA revision in the chosen studies, accounted for 9.2% (127/1,386). The total mean was a union rate of 95.2%, an infection eradication rate of 91.6%, a femoral stem subsidence rate of 16.6%, with the rate of subsidence more than 5 mm being 10.7%. ETO proximal migration was reported in 7.8% of ETOs; however, it rarely required re-attachment (0.9%). Intraoperative fracture during revision THA with ETO was reported to be at a rate of 5%; while postoperative femoral fracture rate was at 7.8%. (2) All 24 cases had radiographic union at 3 to 6 months and there was no reported femoral stem subsidence. CONCLUSION: The overall outcome of this literature review provides moderate-quality evidence indicating that ETO provides safe outcome for revision THAs in single and 2-stage revision surgeries with low ETO non-union, femoral stem subsidence, greater trochanter (GT) proximal migration and fracture rates in the different diagnoses groups of revision THA at over 2-year follow up. In the case series group, there was radiographic union of all ETOs with no reported femoral stem subsidence or periprosthetic fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8976970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89769702022-04-04 Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review Hamad, Khalid Konan, Sujith Arthroplasty Research BACKGROUND: Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) in revision hip arthroplasty provides direct access to the femoral medullary canal and facilitates removal of implants and re-implantation. This study looks at objective outcomes of ETO from a systematic review of the literature and a case series of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases with ETOs from the authors’ local institution. METHODS: (1) The National Institutes of Health (NIH) national library of medicine was searched for studies related to ETO and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) technique were followed. (2) Case series of 23 revision THAs with ETOs from University College London Hospital (UCLH) were retrospectively analyzed with a minimum of 2-year follow-up for radiological outcomes. RESULTS: (1) The main revision THAs diagnoses were aseptic loosening (880/1,386; 63.4%), prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (301/1,386; 21.7%) and periprosthetic THA fractures (78/1,386; 5.6%). Other diagnoses, including non-specified reasons for THA revision in the chosen studies, accounted for 9.2% (127/1,386). The total mean was a union rate of 95.2%, an infection eradication rate of 91.6%, a femoral stem subsidence rate of 16.6%, with the rate of subsidence more than 5 mm being 10.7%. ETO proximal migration was reported in 7.8% of ETOs; however, it rarely required re-attachment (0.9%). Intraoperative fracture during revision THA with ETO was reported to be at a rate of 5%; while postoperative femoral fracture rate was at 7.8%. (2) All 24 cases had radiographic union at 3 to 6 months and there was no reported femoral stem subsidence. CONCLUSION: The overall outcome of this literature review provides moderate-quality evidence indicating that ETO provides safe outcome for revision THAs in single and 2-stage revision surgeries with low ETO non-union, femoral stem subsidence, greater trochanter (GT) proximal migration and fracture rates in the different diagnoses groups of revision THA at over 2-year follow up. In the case series group, there was radiographic union of all ETOs with no reported femoral stem subsidence or periprosthetic fractures. BioMed Central 2022-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8976970/ /pubmed/35366949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00115-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Hamad, Khalid
Konan, Sujith
Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review
title Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review
title_full Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review
title_fullStr Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review
title_short Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review
title_sort extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00115-w
work_keys_str_mv AT hamadkhalid extendedtrochantericosteotomyinrevisionhiparthroplastyacaseseriesstudyandsystematicliteraturereview
AT konansujith extendedtrochantericosteotomyinrevisionhiparthroplastyacaseseriesstudyandsystematicliteraturereview