Cargando…

Evaluation of Situational Judgment Tests in student selection in Indonesia and the impact on diversity issues

BACKGROUND: Internationally, medical selection relies heavily on prior academic attainment which has an adverse impact on the diversity of selected students. Since non-academic attributes are also important, this study aims to evaluate the use of a Situational Judgment Test (SJT) for selection and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soemantri, Diantha, Findyartini, Ardi, Yolanda, Sophie, Morley, Emma, Patterson, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03247-4
_version_ 1784680679442743296
author Soemantri, Diantha
Findyartini, Ardi
Yolanda, Sophie
Morley, Emma
Patterson, Fiona
author_facet Soemantri, Diantha
Findyartini, Ardi
Yolanda, Sophie
Morley, Emma
Patterson, Fiona
author_sort Soemantri, Diantha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Internationally, medical selection relies heavily on prior academic attainment which has an adverse impact on the diversity of selected students. Since non-academic attributes are also important, this study aims to evaluate the use of a Situational Judgment Test (SJT) for selection and the impact on student diversity relating to gender, ethnicity and socio-economic status. Previous SJT research has almost entirely originated from a Western context and this study focuses on new evidence in a South East Asian context with a different demographic profile. METHODS: Thirty faculty members developed 112 SJT scenarios assessing professionalism, communication and self-awareness domains. The scenarios underwent a concordance stage where stakeholder input was sought on the content appropriateness, to define the item scoring key, followed by an initial psychometric evaluation with first and second year medical students (N = 436). Based on these results, 30 scenarios, consisting of 128 nested items, were selected for pilot testing and evaluation regarding diversity issues with two cohorts of applicants in 2017 (N = 446) and 2018 (N = 508). RESULTS: The SJT demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.80 and 0.81 respectively). There were significant differences in SJT scores based on gender in both years, where females consistently outperformed males (p = .0001). However, no significant differences were found based on high school origin, parental educational background or ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the use of an SJT in Indonesia, which has a unique diversity profile compared to Western countries. Largely, the preliminary results replicate previous studies of the potential diversity benefits of using an SJT as a tool for medical student selection and has the potential to level the playing field regarding socio-economic status and ethnicity. Further studies exploring more variables representing diversity are warranted to confirm the early results in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8976983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89769832022-04-04 Evaluation of Situational Judgment Tests in student selection in Indonesia and the impact on diversity issues Soemantri, Diantha Findyartini, Ardi Yolanda, Sophie Morley, Emma Patterson, Fiona BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Internationally, medical selection relies heavily on prior academic attainment which has an adverse impact on the diversity of selected students. Since non-academic attributes are also important, this study aims to evaluate the use of a Situational Judgment Test (SJT) for selection and the impact on student diversity relating to gender, ethnicity and socio-economic status. Previous SJT research has almost entirely originated from a Western context and this study focuses on new evidence in a South East Asian context with a different demographic profile. METHODS: Thirty faculty members developed 112 SJT scenarios assessing professionalism, communication and self-awareness domains. The scenarios underwent a concordance stage where stakeholder input was sought on the content appropriateness, to define the item scoring key, followed by an initial psychometric evaluation with first and second year medical students (N = 436). Based on these results, 30 scenarios, consisting of 128 nested items, were selected for pilot testing and evaluation regarding diversity issues with two cohorts of applicants in 2017 (N = 446) and 2018 (N = 508). RESULTS: The SJT demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.80 and 0.81 respectively). There were significant differences in SJT scores based on gender in both years, where females consistently outperformed males (p = .0001). However, no significant differences were found based on high school origin, parental educational background or ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the use of an SJT in Indonesia, which has a unique diversity profile compared to Western countries. Largely, the preliminary results replicate previous studies of the potential diversity benefits of using an SJT as a tool for medical student selection and has the potential to level the playing field regarding socio-economic status and ethnicity. Further studies exploring more variables representing diversity are warranted to confirm the early results in this study. BioMed Central 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8976983/ /pubmed/35366862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03247-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Soemantri, Diantha
Findyartini, Ardi
Yolanda, Sophie
Morley, Emma
Patterson, Fiona
Evaluation of Situational Judgment Tests in student selection in Indonesia and the impact on diversity issues
title Evaluation of Situational Judgment Tests in student selection in Indonesia and the impact on diversity issues
title_full Evaluation of Situational Judgment Tests in student selection in Indonesia and the impact on diversity issues
title_fullStr Evaluation of Situational Judgment Tests in student selection in Indonesia and the impact on diversity issues
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Situational Judgment Tests in student selection in Indonesia and the impact on diversity issues
title_short Evaluation of Situational Judgment Tests in student selection in Indonesia and the impact on diversity issues
title_sort evaluation of situational judgment tests in student selection in indonesia and the impact on diversity issues
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03247-4
work_keys_str_mv AT soemantridiantha evaluationofsituationaljudgmenttestsinstudentselectioninindonesiaandtheimpactondiversityissues
AT findyartiniardi evaluationofsituationaljudgmenttestsinstudentselectioninindonesiaandtheimpactondiversityissues
AT yolandasophie evaluationofsituationaljudgmenttestsinstudentselectioninindonesiaandtheimpactondiversityissues
AT morleyemma evaluationofsituationaljudgmenttestsinstudentselectioninindonesiaandtheimpactondiversityissues
AT pattersonfiona evaluationofsituationaljudgmenttestsinstudentselectioninindonesiaandtheimpactondiversityissues