Cargando…

How midwives implemented teleconsultations during the COVID-19 health crisis: a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVES: Our primary and secondary objectives were to measure and understand the determinants of independent midwives' implementation of teleconsultations and their intention to continue these in the future. DESIGN: A two-phase mixed-methods approach: (1) quantitative data to measure factors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rousseau, Anne, Gaucher, Laurent, Gautier, Sylvain, Mahrez, Ines, Baumann, Sophie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057292
_version_ 1784680766519640064
author Rousseau, Anne
Gaucher, Laurent
Gautier, Sylvain
Mahrez, Ines
Baumann, Sophie
author_facet Rousseau, Anne
Gaucher, Laurent
Gautier, Sylvain
Mahrez, Ines
Baumann, Sophie
author_sort Rousseau, Anne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Our primary and secondary objectives were to measure and understand the determinants of independent midwives' implementation of teleconsultations and their intention to continue these in the future. DESIGN: A two-phase mixed-methods approach: (1) quantitative data to measure factors determining the initiation and continuation of teleconsultation, collected by an online survey from 29 April to 15 May 2020, at the end of the first COVID-19 lockdown, followed by (2) qualitative data to understand these determinants, by interviewing some participants in May–July 2020 to explore the quantitative findings in more detail. SETTING: Mainland France PARTICIPANTS: The target population comprised independent midwives currently practising in France. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary and secondary outcomes were binary variables: implementation of teleconsultations, and intention to continue them. The qualitative results provided the themes explaining these decisions. RESULTS: We obtained 1491 complete responses from independent midwives, that is, 28.3% of French independent midwives, and interviewed 22 volunteers among them. Among the 1491, 88.5% implemented teleconsultations and 65.8% intended to continue them. Both individual and organisational factors favoured implementation of teleconsultations: older age (adjusted OR (aOR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.58), female gender (aOR: 6.88, 95% CI: 2.71 to 17.48), married or living with a partner (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.52) and working in a group practice (midwives only—aOR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.72; multiprofessional group—aOR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.64). The qualitative analysis did not identify any new factors but helped us to understand the satisfaction better: midwives adopted telemedicine for their patients' access to and continuity of care, to maintain their professional activity and income, and to limit the risks of infection. CONCLUSION: Personal and organisational factors motivated the implementation of teleconsultation during the pandemic, but maintaining it raises technical, regulatory, and ethical issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8977454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89774542022-04-04 How midwives implemented teleconsultations during the COVID-19 health crisis: a mixed-methods study Rousseau, Anne Gaucher, Laurent Gautier, Sylvain Mahrez, Ines Baumann, Sophie BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: Our primary and secondary objectives were to measure and understand the determinants of independent midwives' implementation of teleconsultations and their intention to continue these in the future. DESIGN: A two-phase mixed-methods approach: (1) quantitative data to measure factors determining the initiation and continuation of teleconsultation, collected by an online survey from 29 April to 15 May 2020, at the end of the first COVID-19 lockdown, followed by (2) qualitative data to understand these determinants, by interviewing some participants in May–July 2020 to explore the quantitative findings in more detail. SETTING: Mainland France PARTICIPANTS: The target population comprised independent midwives currently practising in France. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary and secondary outcomes were binary variables: implementation of teleconsultations, and intention to continue them. The qualitative results provided the themes explaining these decisions. RESULTS: We obtained 1491 complete responses from independent midwives, that is, 28.3% of French independent midwives, and interviewed 22 volunteers among them. Among the 1491, 88.5% implemented teleconsultations and 65.8% intended to continue them. Both individual and organisational factors favoured implementation of teleconsultations: older age (adjusted OR (aOR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.58), female gender (aOR: 6.88, 95% CI: 2.71 to 17.48), married or living with a partner (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.52) and working in a group practice (midwives only—aOR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.72; multiprofessional group—aOR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.64). The qualitative analysis did not identify any new factors but helped us to understand the satisfaction better: midwives adopted telemedicine for their patients' access to and continuity of care, to maintain their professional activity and income, and to limit the risks of infection. CONCLUSION: Personal and organisational factors motivated the implementation of teleconsultation during the pandemic, but maintaining it raises technical, regulatory, and ethical issues. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8977454/ /pubmed/35365534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057292 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Rousseau, Anne
Gaucher, Laurent
Gautier, Sylvain
Mahrez, Ines
Baumann, Sophie
How midwives implemented teleconsultations during the COVID-19 health crisis: a mixed-methods study
title How midwives implemented teleconsultations during the COVID-19 health crisis: a mixed-methods study
title_full How midwives implemented teleconsultations during the COVID-19 health crisis: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr How midwives implemented teleconsultations during the COVID-19 health crisis: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed How midwives implemented teleconsultations during the COVID-19 health crisis: a mixed-methods study
title_short How midwives implemented teleconsultations during the COVID-19 health crisis: a mixed-methods study
title_sort how midwives implemented teleconsultations during the covid-19 health crisis: a mixed-methods study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057292
work_keys_str_mv AT rousseauanne howmidwivesimplementedteleconsultationsduringthecovid19healthcrisisamixedmethodsstudy
AT gaucherlaurent howmidwivesimplementedteleconsultationsduringthecovid19healthcrisisamixedmethodsstudy
AT gautiersylvain howmidwivesimplementedteleconsultationsduringthecovid19healthcrisisamixedmethodsstudy
AT mahrezines howmidwivesimplementedteleconsultationsduringthecovid19healthcrisisamixedmethodsstudy
AT baumannsophie howmidwivesimplementedteleconsultationsduringthecovid19healthcrisisamixedmethodsstudy