Cargando…
Categorical Versus Graded Beliefs
This essay discusses the difficulty to reconcile two paradigms about beliefs: the binary or categorical paradigm of yes/no beliefs and the probabilistic paradigm of degrees of belief. The possibility for someone to hold beliefs of both types simultaneously is challenged by the lottery paradox, and m...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817940 |
_version_ | 1784680811573805056 |
---|---|
author | Dietrich, Franz |
author_facet | Dietrich, Franz |
author_sort | Dietrich, Franz |
collection | PubMed |
description | This essay discusses the difficulty to reconcile two paradigms about beliefs: the binary or categorical paradigm of yes/no beliefs and the probabilistic paradigm of degrees of belief. The possibility for someone to hold beliefs of both types simultaneously is challenged by the lottery paradox, and more recently by a general impossibility theorem by Dietrich and List. The nature, relevance, and implications of the tension are explained and assessed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8977639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89776392022-04-05 Categorical Versus Graded Beliefs Dietrich, Franz Front Psychol Psychology This essay discusses the difficulty to reconcile two paradigms about beliefs: the binary or categorical paradigm of yes/no beliefs and the probabilistic paradigm of degrees of belief. The possibility for someone to hold beliefs of both types simultaneously is challenged by the lottery paradox, and more recently by a general impossibility theorem by Dietrich and List. The nature, relevance, and implications of the tension are explained and assessed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8977639/ /pubmed/35386884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817940 Text en Copyright © 2022 Dietrich. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Dietrich, Franz Categorical Versus Graded Beliefs |
title | Categorical Versus Graded Beliefs |
title_full | Categorical Versus Graded Beliefs |
title_fullStr | Categorical Versus Graded Beliefs |
title_full_unstemmed | Categorical Versus Graded Beliefs |
title_short | Categorical Versus Graded Beliefs |
title_sort | categorical versus graded beliefs |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817940 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dietrichfranz categoricalversusgradedbeliefs |