Cargando…
Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey
OBJECTIVES: Difficulties with recruitment into clinical trials are common. An opt-out recruitment strategy, whereby potential participants can decline further contact about a study (opt-out), and non-responders are contacted, may facilitate participation. Primary objectives examined opt-out and cons...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056758 |
_version_ | 1784680846772404224 |
---|---|
author | Hagström, Josefin Woodford, Joanne von Essen, Agnes Lähteenmäki, Päivi von Essen, Louise |
author_facet | Hagström, Josefin Woodford, Joanne von Essen, Agnes Lähteenmäki, Päivi von Essen, Louise |
author_sort | Hagström, Josefin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Difficulties with recruitment into clinical trials are common. An opt-out recruitment strategy, whereby potential participants can decline further contact about a study (opt-out), and non-responders are contacted, may facilitate participation. Primary objectives examined opt-out and consent rates, mode and time point of opt-out, and sociodemographic characteristics of those who opted out versus those who chose to participate in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided, internet-administered, cognitive–behavioural therapy-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer. Secondary objectives examined reasons for non-participation. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey nested within the ENGAGE feasibility trial. SETTING: The intervention was delivered from Uppsala University, with parents located throughout Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Potential participants were recruited 3 months–5 years following their child ending treatment for cancer and were identified via their personal identification number (via the Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry and Swedish Tax Agency) and invited via postal invitation packs and could opt out via post, online, telephone or email. Those who did not opt out or consent, within 4 weeks, received up to five telephone calls and/or one postal reminder. RESULTS: Of 509 invited, 164 (32.2%) opted out, 78 (47.6%) via post, 53 (32.3%) via telephone, 24 (14.6%) online, and 6 (3.7%) via email, 88 (53.7%) opted out after at least one telephone call and/or postal reminder. There was a trend for parents with lower educational levels to opt out. No need of psychological support, lack of time, and no interest in internet-administered self-help were frequently reported reasons for non-participation. CONCLUSIONS: Results emphasise the importance of using different opt-out modes and suggest future research should consider how to widen study participation for parents with lower education levels. Self-identifying a need for psychological support and the acceptability of internet-administered self-help are important factors for participation and should be considered in future research to increase recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN57233429. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8977820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89778202022-04-20 Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey Hagström, Josefin Woodford, Joanne von Essen, Agnes Lähteenmäki, Päivi von Essen, Louise BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: Difficulties with recruitment into clinical trials are common. An opt-out recruitment strategy, whereby potential participants can decline further contact about a study (opt-out), and non-responders are contacted, may facilitate participation. Primary objectives examined opt-out and consent rates, mode and time point of opt-out, and sociodemographic characteristics of those who opted out versus those who chose to participate in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided, internet-administered, cognitive–behavioural therapy-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer. Secondary objectives examined reasons for non-participation. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey nested within the ENGAGE feasibility trial. SETTING: The intervention was delivered from Uppsala University, with parents located throughout Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Potential participants were recruited 3 months–5 years following their child ending treatment for cancer and were identified via their personal identification number (via the Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry and Swedish Tax Agency) and invited via postal invitation packs and could opt out via post, online, telephone or email. Those who did not opt out or consent, within 4 weeks, received up to five telephone calls and/or one postal reminder. RESULTS: Of 509 invited, 164 (32.2%) opted out, 78 (47.6%) via post, 53 (32.3%) via telephone, 24 (14.6%) online, and 6 (3.7%) via email, 88 (53.7%) opted out after at least one telephone call and/or postal reminder. There was a trend for parents with lower educational levels to opt out. No need of psychological support, lack of time, and no interest in internet-administered self-help were frequently reported reasons for non-participation. CONCLUSIONS: Results emphasise the importance of using different opt-out modes and suggest future research should consider how to widen study participation for parents with lower education levels. Self-identifying a need for psychological support and the acceptability of internet-administered self-help are important factors for participation and should be considered in future research to increase recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN57233429. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8977820/ /pubmed/35365530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056758 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Hagström, Josefin Woodford, Joanne von Essen, Agnes Lähteenmäki, Päivi von Essen, Louise Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey |
title | Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey |
title_full | Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey |
title_fullStr | Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey |
title_short | Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey |
title_sort | opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (engage) of a guided internet-administered cbt-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hagstromjosefin optoutratesandreasonsfornonparticipationinasinglearmfeasibilitytrialengageofaguidedinternetadministeredcbtbasedinterventionforparentsofchildrentreatedforcanceranestedcrosssectionalsurvey AT woodfordjoanne optoutratesandreasonsfornonparticipationinasinglearmfeasibilitytrialengageofaguidedinternetadministeredcbtbasedinterventionforparentsofchildrentreatedforcanceranestedcrosssectionalsurvey AT vonessenagnes optoutratesandreasonsfornonparticipationinasinglearmfeasibilitytrialengageofaguidedinternetadministeredcbtbasedinterventionforparentsofchildrentreatedforcanceranestedcrosssectionalsurvey AT lahteenmakipaivi optoutratesandreasonsfornonparticipationinasinglearmfeasibilitytrialengageofaguidedinternetadministeredcbtbasedinterventionforparentsofchildrentreatedforcanceranestedcrosssectionalsurvey AT vonessenlouise optoutratesandreasonsfornonparticipationinasinglearmfeasibilitytrialengageofaguidedinternetadministeredcbtbasedinterventionforparentsofchildrentreatedforcanceranestedcrosssectionalsurvey |