Cargando…
Weight is More Informative than Body Mass Index for Predicting Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC)
We considered whether weight is more informative than body mass index (BMI) = weight/height(2) when predicting breast cancer risk for postmenopausal women, and if the weight association differs by underlying familial risk. We studied 6,761 women postmenopausal at baseline with a wide range of famili...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for Cancer Research
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0164 |
_version_ | 1784680851877920768 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Zhoufeng Li, Shuai Dite, Gillian S. Nguyen, Tuong L. MacInnis, Robert J. Andrulis, Irene L. Buys, Saundra S. Daly, Mary B. John, Esther M. Kurian, Allison W. Genkinger, Jeanine M. Chung, Wendy K. Phillips, Kelly-Anne Thorne, Heather Thorne, Heather Winship, Ingrid M. Milne, Roger L. Dugué, Pierre-Antoine Southey, Melissa C. Giles, Graham G. Terry, Mary Beth Hopper, John L. |
author_facet | Ye, Zhoufeng Li, Shuai Dite, Gillian S. Nguyen, Tuong L. MacInnis, Robert J. Andrulis, Irene L. Buys, Saundra S. Daly, Mary B. John, Esther M. Kurian, Allison W. Genkinger, Jeanine M. Chung, Wendy K. Phillips, Kelly-Anne Thorne, Heather Thorne, Heather Winship, Ingrid M. Milne, Roger L. Dugué, Pierre-Antoine Southey, Melissa C. Giles, Graham G. Terry, Mary Beth Hopper, John L. |
author_sort | Ye, Zhoufeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | We considered whether weight is more informative than body mass index (BMI) = weight/height(2) when predicting breast cancer risk for postmenopausal women, and if the weight association differs by underlying familial risk. We studied 6,761 women postmenopausal at baseline with a wide range of familial risk from 2,364 families in the Prospective Family Study Cohort. Participants were followed for on average 11.45 years and there were 416 incident breast cancers. We used Cox regression to estimate risk associations with log-transformed weight and BMI after adjusting for underlying familial risk. We compared model fits using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and nested models using the likelihood ratio test. The AIC for the weight-only model was 6.22 units lower than for the BMI-only model, and the log risk gradient was 23% greater. Adding BMI or height to weight did not improve fit (ΔAIC = 0.90 and 0.83, respectively; both P = 0.3). Conversely, adding weight to BMI or height gave better fits (ΔAIC = 5.32 and 11.64; P = 0.007 and 0.0002, respectively). Adding height improved only the BMI model (ΔAIC = 5.47; P = 0.006). There was no evidence that the BMI or weight associations differed by underlying familial risk (P > 0.2). Weight is more informative than BMI for predicting breast cancer risk, consistent with nonadipose as well as adipose tissue being etiologically relevant. The independent but multiplicative associations of weight and familial risk suggest that, in terms of absolute breast cancer risk, the association with weight is more important the greater a woman's underlying familial risk. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that the relationship between BMI and breast cancer could be due to a relationship between weight and breast cancer, downgraded by inappropriately adjusting for height; potential importance of anthropometric measures other than total body fat; breast cancer risk associations with BMI and weight are across a continuum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8977841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Association for Cancer Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89778412022-09-01 Weight is More Informative than Body Mass Index for Predicting Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC) Ye, Zhoufeng Li, Shuai Dite, Gillian S. Nguyen, Tuong L. MacInnis, Robert J. Andrulis, Irene L. Buys, Saundra S. Daly, Mary B. John, Esther M. Kurian, Allison W. Genkinger, Jeanine M. Chung, Wendy K. Phillips, Kelly-Anne Thorne, Heather Thorne, Heather Winship, Ingrid M. Milne, Roger L. Dugué, Pierre-Antoine Southey, Melissa C. Giles, Graham G. Terry, Mary Beth Hopper, John L. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Research Articles We considered whether weight is more informative than body mass index (BMI) = weight/height(2) when predicting breast cancer risk for postmenopausal women, and if the weight association differs by underlying familial risk. We studied 6,761 women postmenopausal at baseline with a wide range of familial risk from 2,364 families in the Prospective Family Study Cohort. Participants were followed for on average 11.45 years and there were 416 incident breast cancers. We used Cox regression to estimate risk associations with log-transformed weight and BMI after adjusting for underlying familial risk. We compared model fits using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and nested models using the likelihood ratio test. The AIC for the weight-only model was 6.22 units lower than for the BMI-only model, and the log risk gradient was 23% greater. Adding BMI or height to weight did not improve fit (ΔAIC = 0.90 and 0.83, respectively; both P = 0.3). Conversely, adding weight to BMI or height gave better fits (ΔAIC = 5.32 and 11.64; P = 0.007 and 0.0002, respectively). Adding height improved only the BMI model (ΔAIC = 5.47; P = 0.006). There was no evidence that the BMI or weight associations differed by underlying familial risk (P > 0.2). Weight is more informative than BMI for predicting breast cancer risk, consistent with nonadipose as well as adipose tissue being etiologically relevant. The independent but multiplicative associations of weight and familial risk suggest that, in terms of absolute breast cancer risk, the association with weight is more important the greater a woman's underlying familial risk. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that the relationship between BMI and breast cancer could be due to a relationship between weight and breast cancer, downgraded by inappropriately adjusting for height; potential importance of anthropometric measures other than total body fat; breast cancer risk associations with BMI and weight are across a continuum. American Association for Cancer Research 2022-03-01 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8977841/ /pubmed/34965921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0164 Text en ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Ye, Zhoufeng Li, Shuai Dite, Gillian S. Nguyen, Tuong L. MacInnis, Robert J. Andrulis, Irene L. Buys, Saundra S. Daly, Mary B. John, Esther M. Kurian, Allison W. Genkinger, Jeanine M. Chung, Wendy K. Phillips, Kelly-Anne Thorne, Heather Thorne, Heather Winship, Ingrid M. Milne, Roger L. Dugué, Pierre-Antoine Southey, Melissa C. Giles, Graham G. Terry, Mary Beth Hopper, John L. Weight is More Informative than Body Mass Index for Predicting Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC) |
title | Weight is More Informative than Body Mass Index for Predicting Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC) |
title_full | Weight is More Informative than Body Mass Index for Predicting Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC) |
title_fullStr | Weight is More Informative than Body Mass Index for Predicting Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC) |
title_full_unstemmed | Weight is More Informative than Body Mass Index for Predicting Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC) |
title_short | Weight is More Informative than Body Mass Index for Predicting Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC) |
title_sort | weight is more informative than body mass index for predicting postmenopausal breast cancer risk: prospective family study cohort (prof-sc) |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0164 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yezhoufeng weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT lishuai weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT ditegillians weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT nguyentuongl weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT macinnisrobertj weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT andrulisirenel weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT buyssaundras weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT dalymaryb weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT johnestherm weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT kurianallisonw weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT genkingerjeaninem weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT chungwendyk weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT phillipskellyanne weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT thorneheather weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT thorneheather weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT winshipingridm weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT milnerogerl weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT duguepierreantoine weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT southeymelissac weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT gilesgrahamg weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT terrymarybeth weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc AT hopperjohnl weightismoreinformativethanbodymassindexforpredictingpostmenopausalbreastcancerriskprospectivefamilystudycohortprofsc |