Cargando…

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans acquired before and after single-dose ablative neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation (NA-PBI), and explore the relation between semiquantitative MRI parameters...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasmel, Jeanine E., Groot Koerkamp, Maureen L., Mandija, Stefano, Veldhuis, Wouter B., Moman, Maaike R., Froeling, Martijn, van der Velden, Bas H.M., Charaghvandi, Ramona K., Vreuls, Celien P.H., van Diest, Paul J., van Leeuwen, A.M. Gijs, van Gorp, Joost, Philippens, Marielle E.P., van Asselen, Bram, Lagendijk, Jan J.W., Verkooijen, Helena M., van den Bongard, H.J.G. Desirée, Houweling, Antonetta C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100854
_version_ 1784680855602462720
author Vasmel, Jeanine E.
Groot Koerkamp, Maureen L.
Mandija, Stefano
Veldhuis, Wouter B.
Moman, Maaike R.
Froeling, Martijn
van der Velden, Bas H.M.
Charaghvandi, Ramona K.
Vreuls, Celien P.H.
van Diest, Paul J.
van Leeuwen, A.M. Gijs
van Gorp, Joost
Philippens, Marielle E.P.
van Asselen, Bram
Lagendijk, Jan J.W.
Verkooijen, Helena M.
van den Bongard, H.J.G. Desirée
Houweling, Antonetta C.
author_facet Vasmel, Jeanine E.
Groot Koerkamp, Maureen L.
Mandija, Stefano
Veldhuis, Wouter B.
Moman, Maaike R.
Froeling, Martijn
van der Velden, Bas H.M.
Charaghvandi, Ramona K.
Vreuls, Celien P.H.
van Diest, Paul J.
van Leeuwen, A.M. Gijs
van Gorp, Joost
Philippens, Marielle E.P.
van Asselen, Bram
Lagendijk, Jan J.W.
Verkooijen, Helena M.
van den Bongard, H.J.G. Desirée
Houweling, Antonetta C.
author_sort Vasmel, Jeanine E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans acquired before and after single-dose ablative neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation (NA-PBI), and explore the relation between semiquantitative MRI parameters and radiologic and pathologic responses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed 3.0T DCE and DW-MRI of 36 patients with low-risk breast cancer who were treated with single-dose NA-PBI, followed by breast-conserving surgery 6 or 8 months later. MRI was acquired before NA-PBI and 1 week, 2, 4, and 6 months after NA-PBI. Breast radiologists assessed the radiologic response and breast pathologists scored the pathologic response after surgery. Patients were grouped as either pathologic responders or nonresponders (<10% vs ≥10% residual tumor cells). The semiquantitative MRI parameters evaluated were time to enhancement (TTE), 1-minute relative enhancement (RE(1min)), percentage of enhancing voxels (%EV), distribution of washout curve types, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). RESULTS: In general, the enhancement increased 1 week after NA-PBI (baseline vs 1 week median – TTE: 15s vs 10s; RE(1min): 161% vs 197%; %EV: 47% vs 67%) and decreased from 2 months onward (6 months median – TTE: 25s; RE(1min): 86%; %EV: 12%). Median ADC increased from 0.83 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s at baseline to 1.28 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s at 6 months. TTE, RE(1min), and %EV showed the most potential to differentiate between radiologic responses, and TTE, RE(1min), and ADC between pathologic responses. CONCLUSIONS: Semiquantitative analyses of DCE and DW-MRI showed changes in relative enhancement and ADC 1 week after NA-PBI, indicating acute inflammation, followed by changes indicating tumor regression from 2 to 6 months after radiation therapy. A relation between the MRI parameters and radiologic and pathologic responses could not be proven in this exploratory study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8977856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89778562022-04-05 Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation Vasmel, Jeanine E. Groot Koerkamp, Maureen L. Mandija, Stefano Veldhuis, Wouter B. Moman, Maaike R. Froeling, Martijn van der Velden, Bas H.M. Charaghvandi, Ramona K. Vreuls, Celien P.H. van Diest, Paul J. van Leeuwen, A.M. Gijs van Gorp, Joost Philippens, Marielle E.P. van Asselen, Bram Lagendijk, Jan J.W. Verkooijen, Helena M. van den Bongard, H.J.G. Desirée Houweling, Antonetta C. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans acquired before and after single-dose ablative neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation (NA-PBI), and explore the relation between semiquantitative MRI parameters and radiologic and pathologic responses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed 3.0T DCE and DW-MRI of 36 patients with low-risk breast cancer who were treated with single-dose NA-PBI, followed by breast-conserving surgery 6 or 8 months later. MRI was acquired before NA-PBI and 1 week, 2, 4, and 6 months after NA-PBI. Breast radiologists assessed the radiologic response and breast pathologists scored the pathologic response after surgery. Patients were grouped as either pathologic responders or nonresponders (<10% vs ≥10% residual tumor cells). The semiquantitative MRI parameters evaluated were time to enhancement (TTE), 1-minute relative enhancement (RE(1min)), percentage of enhancing voxels (%EV), distribution of washout curve types, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). RESULTS: In general, the enhancement increased 1 week after NA-PBI (baseline vs 1 week median – TTE: 15s vs 10s; RE(1min): 161% vs 197%; %EV: 47% vs 67%) and decreased from 2 months onward (6 months median – TTE: 25s; RE(1min): 86%; %EV: 12%). Median ADC increased from 0.83 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s at baseline to 1.28 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s at 6 months. TTE, RE(1min), and %EV showed the most potential to differentiate between radiologic responses, and TTE, RE(1min), and ADC between pathologic responses. CONCLUSIONS: Semiquantitative analyses of DCE and DW-MRI showed changes in relative enhancement and ADC 1 week after NA-PBI, indicating acute inflammation, followed by changes indicating tumor regression from 2 to 6 months after radiation therapy. A relation between the MRI parameters and radiologic and pathologic responses could not be proven in this exploratory study. Elsevier 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8977856/ /pubmed/35387418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100854 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Vasmel, Jeanine E.
Groot Koerkamp, Maureen L.
Mandija, Stefano
Veldhuis, Wouter B.
Moman, Maaike R.
Froeling, Martijn
van der Velden, Bas H.M.
Charaghvandi, Ramona K.
Vreuls, Celien P.H.
van Diest, Paul J.
van Leeuwen, A.M. Gijs
van Gorp, Joost
Philippens, Marielle E.P.
van Asselen, Bram
Lagendijk, Jan J.W.
Verkooijen, Helena M.
van den Bongard, H.J.G. Desirée
Houweling, Antonetta C.
Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation
title Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation
title_full Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation
title_fullStr Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation
title_short Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation
title_sort dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for response evaluation after single-dose ablative neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100854
work_keys_str_mv AT vasmeljeaninee dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT grootkoerkampmaureenl dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT mandijastefano dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT veldhuiswouterb dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT momanmaaiker dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT froelingmartijn dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT vanderveldenbashm dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT charaghvandiramonak dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT vreulscelienph dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT vandiestpaulj dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT vanleeuwenamgijs dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT vangorpjoost dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT philippensmarielleep dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT vanasselenbram dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT lagendijkjanjw dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT verkooijenhelenam dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT vandenbongardhjgdesiree dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation
AT houwelingantonettac dynamiccontrastenhancedanddiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingforresponseevaluationaftersingledoseablativeneoadjuvantpartialbreastirradiation