Cargando…
MRI-directed biopsy for primary detection of prostate cancer in a population of 223 men: MRI In-Bore vs MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted techniques
OBJECTIVES: To compare the detection rates of overall prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and the median percentage of cancer per biopsy core between MRI-guided In-bore and MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy (TBx). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 223 patients who underwen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34609900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210528 |
_version_ | 1784680929899315200 |
---|---|
author | Del Monte, Maurizio Cipollari, Stefano Del Giudice, Francesco Pecoraro, Martina Bicchetti, Marco Messina, Emanuele Dehghanpour, Ailin Ciardi, Antonio Sciarra, Alessandro Catalano, Carlo Panebianco, Valeria |
author_facet | Del Monte, Maurizio Cipollari, Stefano Del Giudice, Francesco Pecoraro, Martina Bicchetti, Marco Messina, Emanuele Dehghanpour, Ailin Ciardi, Antonio Sciarra, Alessandro Catalano, Carlo Panebianco, Valeria |
author_sort | Del Monte, Maurizio |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the detection rates of overall prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and the median percentage of cancer per biopsy core between MRI-guided In-bore and MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy (TBx). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 223 patients who underwent prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and subsequent MR-directed biopsy were included. For PCa and csPCa detection rate (DR), contingency tables were tested via the Pearson’s chi-squared to explore the variance of the outcome distribution. The percentage of cancer per biopsy core was tested with a two-tailed Mann-Withney test. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen and 106 patients underwent MRI-TRUS fusion or MRI In-bore TBx, respectively. 402 MRI biopsy targets were identified, of which 206 (51.2%) were biopsied with the MRI-TRUS TBx and 196 (48.8%) with the MRI In-bore TBx technique. Per-patient PCa and csPCa detection rates were 140/223 (62.8%) and 97/223 (43.5%), respectively. PCa-DR was 73/117 (62.4%) and 67/106 (63.2%) for MRI-TRUS and MRI In-Bore TBx (p = 0.9), while csPCa detection rate reached 50/117 (42.7%) and 47/106 (44.3%), respectively (p = 0.81). The median per-patient percentage of malignant tissue within biopsy cores was 50% (IQR: 27–65%) for PCa and 60% (IQR: 35–68%) for csPCa, with a statistically significant difference between the techniques. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference in the detection rate of MRI In-bore and MRI-TRUS fusion TBx was found. MRI In-bore TBx showed higher per-core percentage of malignant cells. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MRI In-bore biopsy might impact risk stratification and patient management considering the higher per-core percentage of malignant cells, especially for patients eligible for active surveillance or focal therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8978234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89782342022-04-11 MRI-directed biopsy for primary detection of prostate cancer in a population of 223 men: MRI In-Bore vs MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted techniques Del Monte, Maurizio Cipollari, Stefano Del Giudice, Francesco Pecoraro, Martina Bicchetti, Marco Messina, Emanuele Dehghanpour, Ailin Ciardi, Antonio Sciarra, Alessandro Catalano, Carlo Panebianco, Valeria Br J Radiol Innovations in prostate cancer special feature : Full Paper OBJECTIVES: To compare the detection rates of overall prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and the median percentage of cancer per biopsy core between MRI-guided In-bore and MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy (TBx). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 223 patients who underwent prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and subsequent MR-directed biopsy were included. For PCa and csPCa detection rate (DR), contingency tables were tested via the Pearson’s chi-squared to explore the variance of the outcome distribution. The percentage of cancer per biopsy core was tested with a two-tailed Mann-Withney test. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen and 106 patients underwent MRI-TRUS fusion or MRI In-bore TBx, respectively. 402 MRI biopsy targets were identified, of which 206 (51.2%) were biopsied with the MRI-TRUS TBx and 196 (48.8%) with the MRI In-bore TBx technique. Per-patient PCa and csPCa detection rates were 140/223 (62.8%) and 97/223 (43.5%), respectively. PCa-DR was 73/117 (62.4%) and 67/106 (63.2%) for MRI-TRUS and MRI In-Bore TBx (p = 0.9), while csPCa detection rate reached 50/117 (42.7%) and 47/106 (44.3%), respectively (p = 0.81). The median per-patient percentage of malignant tissue within biopsy cores was 50% (IQR: 27–65%) for PCa and 60% (IQR: 35–68%) for csPCa, with a statistically significant difference between the techniques. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference in the detection rate of MRI In-bore and MRI-TRUS fusion TBx was found. MRI In-bore TBx showed higher per-core percentage of malignant cells. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MRI In-bore biopsy might impact risk stratification and patient management considering the higher per-core percentage of malignant cells, especially for patients eligible for active surveillance or focal therapy. The British Institute of Radiology. 2022-03-01 2021-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8978234/ /pubmed/34609900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210528 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Innovations in prostate cancer special feature : Full Paper Del Monte, Maurizio Cipollari, Stefano Del Giudice, Francesco Pecoraro, Martina Bicchetti, Marco Messina, Emanuele Dehghanpour, Ailin Ciardi, Antonio Sciarra, Alessandro Catalano, Carlo Panebianco, Valeria MRI-directed biopsy for primary detection of prostate cancer in a population of 223 men: MRI In-Bore vs MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted techniques |
title | MRI-directed biopsy for primary detection of prostate cancer in a population of 223 men: MRI In-Bore vs MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted techniques |
title_full | MRI-directed biopsy for primary detection of prostate cancer in a population of 223 men: MRI In-Bore vs MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted techniques |
title_fullStr | MRI-directed biopsy for primary detection of prostate cancer in a population of 223 men: MRI In-Bore vs MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | MRI-directed biopsy for primary detection of prostate cancer in a population of 223 men: MRI In-Bore vs MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted techniques |
title_short | MRI-directed biopsy for primary detection of prostate cancer in a population of 223 men: MRI In-Bore vs MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted techniques |
title_sort | mri-directed biopsy for primary detection of prostate cancer in a population of 223 men: mri in-bore vs mri-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted techniques |
topic | Innovations in prostate cancer special feature : Full Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34609900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delmontemaurizio mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques AT cipollaristefano mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques AT delgiudicefrancesco mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques AT pecoraromartina mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques AT bicchettimarco mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques AT messinaemanuele mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques AT dehghanpourailin mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques AT ciardiantonio mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques AT sciarraalessandro mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques AT catalanocarlo mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques AT panebiancovaleria mridirectedbiopsyforprimarydetectionofprostatecancerinapopulationof223menmriinborevsmritransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedtechniques |