Cargando…

Structured reporting in radiologic education – Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficiency of structured reporting in radiologic education – based on the example of different PI-RADS score versions for multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate. METHODS: MpMRI of 688 prostate lesions in 180 patients were retrospectively reviewed by an experienced ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garmer, Marietta, Karpienski, Julia, Groenemeyer, Dietrich HW, Wagener, Birgit, Kamper, Lars, Haage, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34914538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210458
_version_ 1784680930357542912
author Garmer, Marietta
Karpienski, Julia
Groenemeyer, Dietrich HW
Wagener, Birgit
Kamper, Lars
Haage, Patrick
author_facet Garmer, Marietta
Karpienski, Julia
Groenemeyer, Dietrich HW
Wagener, Birgit
Kamper, Lars
Haage, Patrick
author_sort Garmer, Marietta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficiency of structured reporting in radiologic education – based on the example of different PI-RADS score versions for multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate. METHODS: MpMRI of 688 prostate lesions in 180 patients were retrospectively reviewed by an experienced radiologist and by a student using PI-RADS V1 and V2. Data sets were reviewed for changes according to PI-RADS V2.1. The results were correlated with results obtained by MR-guided biopsy. Diagnostic potency was evaluated by ROC analysis. Sensitivity, specificity and correct-graded samples were evaluated for different cutpoints. The agreement between radiologist and student was determined for the aggregation of the PI-RADS score in three categories. The student’s time needed for evaluation was measured. RESULTS: The area under curve of the ROC analysis was 0.782/0.788 (V1/V2) for the student and 0.841/0.833 (V1/V2) for the radiologist. The agreement between student and radiologist showed a Cohen‘s weighted κ coefficient of 0.495 for V1 and 0.518 for V2. Median student’s time needed for score assessment was 4:34 min for PI-RADSv1 and 2:00 min for PI-RADSv2 (p < 0.001). Re-evaluation for V2.1 changed the category in 1.4% of all ratings. CONCLUSION: The capacity of prostate cancer detection using PI-RADS V1 and V2 is dependent on the reader‘s experience. The results from the two observers indicate that structured reporting using PI-RADS and, controlled by histopathology, can be a valuable and quantifiable tool in students‘ or residents’ education. Herein, V2 was superior to V1 in terms of inter-observer agreement and time efficacy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Structured reporting can be a valuable and quantifiable tool in radiologic education. Structured reporting using PI-RADS can be used by a student with good performance. PI-RADS V2 is superior to V1 in terms of inter-observer agreement and time efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8978241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89782412022-04-11 Structured reporting in radiologic education – Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies Garmer, Marietta Karpienski, Julia Groenemeyer, Dietrich HW Wagener, Birgit Kamper, Lars Haage, Patrick Br J Radiol Innovations in prostate cancer special feature : Full Paper OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficiency of structured reporting in radiologic education – based on the example of different PI-RADS score versions for multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate. METHODS: MpMRI of 688 prostate lesions in 180 patients were retrospectively reviewed by an experienced radiologist and by a student using PI-RADS V1 and V2. Data sets were reviewed for changes according to PI-RADS V2.1. The results were correlated with results obtained by MR-guided biopsy. Diagnostic potency was evaluated by ROC analysis. Sensitivity, specificity and correct-graded samples were evaluated for different cutpoints. The agreement between radiologist and student was determined for the aggregation of the PI-RADS score in three categories. The student’s time needed for evaluation was measured. RESULTS: The area under curve of the ROC analysis was 0.782/0.788 (V1/V2) for the student and 0.841/0.833 (V1/V2) for the radiologist. The agreement between student and radiologist showed a Cohen‘s weighted κ coefficient of 0.495 for V1 and 0.518 for V2. Median student’s time needed for score assessment was 4:34 min for PI-RADSv1 and 2:00 min for PI-RADSv2 (p < 0.001). Re-evaluation for V2.1 changed the category in 1.4% of all ratings. CONCLUSION: The capacity of prostate cancer detection using PI-RADS V1 and V2 is dependent on the reader‘s experience. The results from the two observers indicate that structured reporting using PI-RADS and, controlled by histopathology, can be a valuable and quantifiable tool in students‘ or residents’ education. Herein, V2 was superior to V1 in terms of inter-observer agreement and time efficacy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Structured reporting can be a valuable and quantifiable tool in radiologic education. Structured reporting using PI-RADS can be used by a student with good performance. PI-RADS V2 is superior to V1 in terms of inter-observer agreement and time efficacy. The British Institute of Radiology. 2022-03-01 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8978241/ /pubmed/34914538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210458 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Innovations in prostate cancer special feature : Full Paper
Garmer, Marietta
Karpienski, Julia
Groenemeyer, Dietrich HW
Wagener, Birgit
Kamper, Lars
Haage, Patrick
Structured reporting in radiologic education – Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies
title Structured reporting in radiologic education – Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies
title_full Structured reporting in radiologic education – Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies
title_fullStr Structured reporting in radiologic education – Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Structured reporting in radiologic education – Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies
title_short Structured reporting in radiologic education – Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies
title_sort structured reporting in radiologic education – potential of different pi-rads versions in prostate mri controlled by in-bore mr-guided biopsies
topic Innovations in prostate cancer special feature : Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34914538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210458
work_keys_str_mv AT garmermarietta structuredreportinginradiologiceducationpotentialofdifferentpiradsversionsinprostatemricontrolledbyinboremrguidedbiopsies
AT karpienskijulia structuredreportinginradiologiceducationpotentialofdifferentpiradsversionsinprostatemricontrolledbyinboremrguidedbiopsies
AT groenemeyerdietrichhw structuredreportinginradiologiceducationpotentialofdifferentpiradsversionsinprostatemricontrolledbyinboremrguidedbiopsies
AT wagenerbirgit structuredreportinginradiologiceducationpotentialofdifferentpiradsversionsinprostatemricontrolledbyinboremrguidedbiopsies
AT kamperlars structuredreportinginradiologiceducationpotentialofdifferentpiradsversionsinprostatemricontrolledbyinboremrguidedbiopsies
AT haagepatrick structuredreportinginradiologiceducationpotentialofdifferentpiradsversionsinprostatemricontrolledbyinboremrguidedbiopsies