Cargando…

Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years

Since the Renaissance, different line types have been distinguished by artists and art theorists. However, it took another hundreds of years until the British artist William Hogarth attributed different degrees of beauty to them. Particularly, in his book “The Analysis of Beauty” (1753) he depicted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hübner, Ronald, Ufken, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695221087738
_version_ 1784680938843668480
author Hübner, Ronald
Ufken, Emily
author_facet Hübner, Ronald
Ufken, Emily
author_sort Hübner, Ronald
collection PubMed
description Since the Renaissance, different line types have been distinguished by artists and art theorists. However, it took another hundreds of years until the British artist William Hogarth attributed different degrees of beauty to them. Particularly, in his book “The Analysis of Beauty” (1753) he depicted seven waving lines, declared line number 4 as the most beautiful, and called it the “line of beauty”. Until today, the line of beauty has a persistently strong influence in many areas such as landscape art and design, calligraphy, furniture design, architecture, dance, etc. It is astonishing that Hogarth's assumptions have never been empirically tested. Therefore, we asked participants to rate Hogarth's lines by their beauty. As a result, line number 4 was indeed the most preferred, although number 5 was judged similarly. An analysis revealed that curvature was nonlinearly related to beauty and explains more than 90% of the variance in the mean aesthetic judgments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8978312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89783122022-04-05 Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years Hübner, Ronald Ufken, Emily Iperception Short Report Since the Renaissance, different line types have been distinguished by artists and art theorists. However, it took another hundreds of years until the British artist William Hogarth attributed different degrees of beauty to them. Particularly, in his book “The Analysis of Beauty” (1753) he depicted seven waving lines, declared line number 4 as the most beautiful, and called it the “line of beauty”. Until today, the line of beauty has a persistently strong influence in many areas such as landscape art and design, calligraphy, furniture design, architecture, dance, etc. It is astonishing that Hogarth's assumptions have never been empirically tested. Therefore, we asked participants to rate Hogarth's lines by their beauty. As a result, line number 4 was indeed the most preferred, although number 5 was judged similarly. An analysis revealed that curvature was nonlinearly related to beauty and explains more than 90% of the variance in the mean aesthetic judgments. SAGE Publications 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8978312/ /pubmed/35386511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695221087738 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Short Report
Hübner, Ronald
Ufken, Emily
Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years
title Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years
title_full Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years
title_fullStr Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years
title_full_unstemmed Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years
title_short Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years
title_sort is hogarth’s ‘line of beauty’ really the most beautiful? an empirical answer after more than 250 years
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695221087738
work_keys_str_mv AT hubnerronald ishogarthslineofbeautyreallythemostbeautifulanempiricalansweraftermorethan250years
AT ufkenemily ishogarthslineofbeautyreallythemostbeautifulanempiricalansweraftermorethan250years