Cargando…
Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years
Since the Renaissance, different line types have been distinguished by artists and art theorists. However, it took another hundreds of years until the British artist William Hogarth attributed different degrees of beauty to them. Particularly, in his book “The Analysis of Beauty” (1753) he depicted...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695221087738 |
_version_ | 1784680938843668480 |
---|---|
author | Hübner, Ronald Ufken, Emily |
author_facet | Hübner, Ronald Ufken, Emily |
author_sort | Hübner, Ronald |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the Renaissance, different line types have been distinguished by artists and art theorists. However, it took another hundreds of years until the British artist William Hogarth attributed different degrees of beauty to them. Particularly, in his book “The Analysis of Beauty” (1753) he depicted seven waving lines, declared line number 4 as the most beautiful, and called it the “line of beauty”. Until today, the line of beauty has a persistently strong influence in many areas such as landscape art and design, calligraphy, furniture design, architecture, dance, etc. It is astonishing that Hogarth's assumptions have never been empirically tested. Therefore, we asked participants to rate Hogarth's lines by their beauty. As a result, line number 4 was indeed the most preferred, although number 5 was judged similarly. An analysis revealed that curvature was nonlinearly related to beauty and explains more than 90% of the variance in the mean aesthetic judgments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8978312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89783122022-04-05 Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years Hübner, Ronald Ufken, Emily Iperception Short Report Since the Renaissance, different line types have been distinguished by artists and art theorists. However, it took another hundreds of years until the British artist William Hogarth attributed different degrees of beauty to them. Particularly, in his book “The Analysis of Beauty” (1753) he depicted seven waving lines, declared line number 4 as the most beautiful, and called it the “line of beauty”. Until today, the line of beauty has a persistently strong influence in many areas such as landscape art and design, calligraphy, furniture design, architecture, dance, etc. It is astonishing that Hogarth's assumptions have never been empirically tested. Therefore, we asked participants to rate Hogarth's lines by their beauty. As a result, line number 4 was indeed the most preferred, although number 5 was judged similarly. An analysis revealed that curvature was nonlinearly related to beauty and explains more than 90% of the variance in the mean aesthetic judgments. SAGE Publications 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8978312/ /pubmed/35386511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695221087738 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Short Report Hübner, Ronald Ufken, Emily Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years |
title | Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years |
title_full | Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years |
title_fullStr | Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years |
title_short | Is Hogarth’s ‘Line of Beauty’ really the most beautiful? An empirical answer after more than 250 years |
title_sort | is hogarth’s ‘line of beauty’ really the most beautiful? an empirical answer after more than 250 years |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695221087738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hubnerronald ishogarthslineofbeautyreallythemostbeautifulanempiricalansweraftermorethan250years AT ufkenemily ishogarthslineofbeautyreallythemostbeautifulanempiricalansweraftermorethan250years |