Cargando…
Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of angioplasty using drug-eluting balloons (DEB) compared with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) to reduce the rate of restenosis. METHODS: This prospective, single-centre, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients that had primary or rest...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221081662 |
_version_ | 1784680941027852288 |
---|---|
author | Fransson, Torbjörn Gottsäter, Anders Abdulrasak, Mohammad Malina, Martin Resch, Timothy |
author_facet | Fransson, Torbjörn Gottsäter, Anders Abdulrasak, Mohammad Malina, Martin Resch, Timothy |
author_sort | Fransson, Torbjörn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of angioplasty using drug-eluting balloons (DEB) compared with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) to reduce the rate of restenosis. METHODS: This prospective, single-centre, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients that had primary or restenotic lesions in native upper extremity arteriovenous (AV) fistulas or at the graft-venous anastomosis. Patients were randomized to angioplasty with a POBA or a DEB. The primary effectiveness endpoints were freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and functional status of access circuit at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 42 (28 male, 14 female; age range, 42–83 years) patients were enrolled. Patients were followed for 12 months. No significant differences were detected between the POBA and DEB groups regarding total number of TLR procedures (31 versus 36, respectively), freedom from TLR (3 versus 4, respectively) and functional status of the access circuit at 12 months (14 of 20 patients [70%] versus 17 of 22 patients [77%], respectively). CONCLUSION: This clinical trial did not demonstrate any significant differences between DEB angioplasty and standard balloon angioplasty when treating dysfunctional haemodialysis access. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8978321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89783212022-04-05 Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial Fransson, Torbjörn Gottsäter, Anders Abdulrasak, Mohammad Malina, Martin Resch, Timothy J Int Med Res Prospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of angioplasty using drug-eluting balloons (DEB) compared with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) to reduce the rate of restenosis. METHODS: This prospective, single-centre, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients that had primary or restenotic lesions in native upper extremity arteriovenous (AV) fistulas or at the graft-venous anastomosis. Patients were randomized to angioplasty with a POBA or a DEB. The primary effectiveness endpoints were freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and functional status of access circuit at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 42 (28 male, 14 female; age range, 42–83 years) patients were enrolled. Patients were followed for 12 months. No significant differences were detected between the POBA and DEB groups regarding total number of TLR procedures (31 versus 36, respectively), freedom from TLR (3 versus 4, respectively) and functional status of the access circuit at 12 months (14 of 20 patients [70%] versus 17 of 22 patients [77%], respectively). CONCLUSION: This clinical trial did not demonstrate any significant differences between DEB angioplasty and standard balloon angioplasty when treating dysfunctional haemodialysis access. SAGE Publications 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8978321/ /pubmed/35354342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221081662 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Prospective Clinical Research Report Fransson, Torbjörn Gottsäter, Anders Abdulrasak, Mohammad Malina, Martin Resch, Timothy Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial |
title | Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial |
title_full | Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial |
title_short | Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial |
title_sort | drug-eluting balloon (deb) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (poba) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: a prospective randomized trial |
topic | Prospective Clinical Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221081662 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franssontorbjorn drugelutingballoondebversusplainoldballoonangioplastypobainthetreatmentoffailingdialysisaccessaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT gottsateranders drugelutingballoondebversusplainoldballoonangioplastypobainthetreatmentoffailingdialysisaccessaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT abdulrasakmohammad drugelutingballoondebversusplainoldballoonangioplastypobainthetreatmentoffailingdialysisaccessaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT malinamartin drugelutingballoondebversusplainoldballoonangioplastypobainthetreatmentoffailingdialysisaccessaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT reschtimothy drugelutingballoondebversusplainoldballoonangioplastypobainthetreatmentoffailingdialysisaccessaprospectiverandomizedtrial |