Cargando…
The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis
While conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are proliferating, their impact on health-related responses during the present pandemic is not yet fully understood. We meta-analyzed correlational and longitudinal evidence from 53 studies (N = 78,625) conducted in 2020 and 2021. Conspiracy beliefs were weak...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101346 |
_version_ | 1784680965502664704 |
---|---|
author | Bierwiaczonek, Kinga Gundersen, Aleksander B. Kunst, Jonas R. |
author_facet | Bierwiaczonek, Kinga Gundersen, Aleksander B. Kunst, Jonas R. |
author_sort | Bierwiaczonek, Kinga |
collection | PubMed |
description | While conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are proliferating, their impact on health-related responses during the present pandemic is not yet fully understood. We meta-analyzed correlational and longitudinal evidence from 53 studies (N = 78,625) conducted in 2020 and 2021. Conspiracy beliefs were weakly associated with more reluctance toward prevention measures both cross-sectionally and over time. They explained lower vaccination and social distancing responses but were unrelated to mask wearing and hygiene responses. Conspiracy beliefs showed an increasing association with prevention responses as the pandemic progressed and explained support for alternative treatments lacking scientific bases (e.g., chloroquine treatment, complementary medicine). Despite small and heterogenous effects, at a large scale, conspiracy beliefs are a non-negligible threat to public health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8978448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89784482022-04-04 The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis Bierwiaczonek, Kinga Gundersen, Aleksander B. Kunst, Jonas R. Curr Opin Psychol Review While conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are proliferating, their impact on health-related responses during the present pandemic is not yet fully understood. We meta-analyzed correlational and longitudinal evidence from 53 studies (N = 78,625) conducted in 2020 and 2021. Conspiracy beliefs were weakly associated with more reluctance toward prevention measures both cross-sectionally and over time. They explained lower vaccination and social distancing responses but were unrelated to mask wearing and hygiene responses. Conspiracy beliefs showed an increasing association with prevention responses as the pandemic progressed and explained support for alternative treatments lacking scientific bases (e.g., chloroquine treatment, complementary medicine). Despite small and heterogenous effects, at a large scale, conspiracy beliefs are a non-negligible threat to public health. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-08 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8978448/ /pubmed/35486966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101346 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Bierwiaczonek, Kinga Gundersen, Aleksander B. Kunst, Jonas R. The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis |
title | The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis |
title_full | The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis |
title_short | The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | role of conspiracy beliefs for covid-19 health responses: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bierwiaczonekkinga theroleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis AT gundersenaleksanderb theroleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis AT kunstjonasr theroleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis AT bierwiaczonekkinga roleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis AT gundersenaleksanderb roleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis AT kunstjonasr roleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis |