Cargando…

The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis

While conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are proliferating, their impact on health-related responses during the present pandemic is not yet fully understood. We meta-analyzed correlational and longitudinal evidence from 53 studies (N = 78,625) conducted in 2020 and 2021. Conspiracy beliefs were weak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bierwiaczonek, Kinga, Gundersen, Aleksander B., Kunst, Jonas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101346
_version_ 1784680965502664704
author Bierwiaczonek, Kinga
Gundersen, Aleksander B.
Kunst, Jonas R.
author_facet Bierwiaczonek, Kinga
Gundersen, Aleksander B.
Kunst, Jonas R.
author_sort Bierwiaczonek, Kinga
collection PubMed
description While conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are proliferating, their impact on health-related responses during the present pandemic is not yet fully understood. We meta-analyzed correlational and longitudinal evidence from 53 studies (N = 78,625) conducted in 2020 and 2021. Conspiracy beliefs were weakly associated with more reluctance toward prevention measures both cross-sectionally and over time. They explained lower vaccination and social distancing responses but were unrelated to mask wearing and hygiene responses. Conspiracy beliefs showed an increasing association with prevention responses as the pandemic progressed and explained support for alternative treatments lacking scientific bases (e.g., chloroquine treatment, complementary medicine). Despite small and heterogenous effects, at a large scale, conspiracy beliefs are a non-negligible threat to public health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8978448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89784482022-04-04 The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis Bierwiaczonek, Kinga Gundersen, Aleksander B. Kunst, Jonas R. Curr Opin Psychol Review While conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are proliferating, their impact on health-related responses during the present pandemic is not yet fully understood. We meta-analyzed correlational and longitudinal evidence from 53 studies (N = 78,625) conducted in 2020 and 2021. Conspiracy beliefs were weakly associated with more reluctance toward prevention measures both cross-sectionally and over time. They explained lower vaccination and social distancing responses but were unrelated to mask wearing and hygiene responses. Conspiracy beliefs showed an increasing association with prevention responses as the pandemic progressed and explained support for alternative treatments lacking scientific bases (e.g., chloroquine treatment, complementary medicine). Despite small and heterogenous effects, at a large scale, conspiracy beliefs are a non-negligible threat to public health. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-08 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8978448/ /pubmed/35486966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101346 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review
Bierwiaczonek, Kinga
Gundersen, Aleksander B.
Kunst, Jonas R.
The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis
title The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis
title_full The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis
title_short The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis
title_sort role of conspiracy beliefs for covid-19 health responses: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101346
work_keys_str_mv AT bierwiaczonekkinga theroleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis
AT gundersenaleksanderb theroleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis
AT kunstjonasr theroleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis
AT bierwiaczonekkinga roleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis
AT gundersenaleksanderb roleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis
AT kunstjonasr roleofconspiracybeliefsforcovid19healthresponsesametaanalysis